AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, WORLDDRUGTRACKER

Five new General Chapters in the European Pharmacopoeia on Genotoxic Impurities in Pharmaceutical APIs

 regulatory  Comments Off on Five new General Chapters in the European Pharmacopoeia on Genotoxic Impurities in Pharmaceutical APIs
Apr 292016
 

During the manufacture of APIs as sulfonate salts, esters of sulfonic acid may develop in undesired chemical side reactions. Recently, five new General Monographs have been included in the European Pharmacopoeia which describe how to cope with these impurities. Read more about these genotoxic impurities and the possibility to control them thanks to risk assessments.

http://www.gmp-compliance.org/enews_05313_Five-new-General-Chapters-in-the-European-Pharmacopoeia-on-Genotoxic-Impurities-in-Pharmaceutical-APIs_15499,S-AYL_n.html

Sulfonic acids are often used for the manufacture of pharmaceutical APIs. They serve as counterions in crystallisation processes, as protective groups or acid catalysts in API syntheses. Here, if short-chain alcohols such as methanol, ethanol or isopropanol are present, the formation of esters of these sulfonic acids can occur, which may have a genotoxic potential (alkylation of DNA).

The Mesilate Working Party which has been appointed in 2008 by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission has elaborated five General Chapters on different sulfonates which have been published in the European Pharmacopoeia Supplement 8.7 that came into force on 1 April 2016. The General Chapters are as follows:

  • 2.5.37 Methyl, ethyl and isopropyl methanesulfonate in methanesulfonic acid
  • 2.5.38 Methyl, ethyl and isopropyl methanesulfonate in active substances
  • 2.5.39 Methanesulfonyl chloride in methanesulfonic acid
  • 2.5.40 Methyl, ethyl and isopropyl toluenesulfonate in active substances
  • 2.5.41 Methyl, ethyl and isopropyl benzenesulfonate in active substances

As reported in a press release from the EDQM dated 25 February 2016 the completion of Chapter 2.5.41 marks the end of the Mesilate Working Party, as decided by the Ph. Eur. Commission. Simultaneously, the Commission had also decided to revise  the section “Production” in APIs-Sulfonates monographs and replace it by an additional standard text according to which the principles of risk management have to be used in the manufacture of APIs with regard to the genotoxic impurities. The text is as follows:

“It is considered that [XXX esters] are genotoxic and are potential impurities in [name of the API]. The manufacturing process should be developed taking into consideration the principles of quality risk management, together with considerations of the quality of starting materials, process capability and validation. The general method [2.5.XX] is available to assist manufacturers.”

Basically, the General Chapters of the European Pharmacopoeia will only be binding when they are referred to in a monograph; the only exception is when the reference made has only a recommendation character. This applies to all these five General Chapters. The purpose of the new text segment in the “Production” sections is to alert the applicant of a marketing authorisation of the risk related to such sulfonates impurities. He / she is not obliged to perform the analytical testing described in the general monographs; it is rather sufficient  to strongly justify the absence of these impurities by means of a risk assessment in the application. The ultimate decision whether this justification is suffiicient lies with the assessor of the competent authority.

 

/////Five new General Chapters, European Pharmacopoeia, Genotoxic Impurities, Pharmaceutical APIs

Share

Risk Assessment of Potentially Genotoxic Impurities within the Framework of Quality by Design

 regulatory, Uncategorized  Comments Off on Risk Assessment of Potentially Genotoxic Impurities within the Framework of Quality by Design
Feb 032014
 

Figure

 

A strategy for the risk assessment of potentially genotoxic impurities is described that utilizes Quality by Design in an effort to furnish greater process and analytical understanding, ultimately leading to a determination of impurity criticality. By identifying the risks and parameters that most influence those risks, an enhancement of both product and process control is attained that mitigates the potential impact of these impurities. This approach calls for the use of toxicological testing where necessary, chemical fate arguments when possible, multivariate analyses to develop design space, and use of spiking data to support specifications. Strong analytical support, especially with the development of low-level detection methods, is critical. We believe that this strategy not only aids in the development of a robust API process but also delivers on the identification and subsequent mitigation of risks to a class of impurities that are of high interest in the field.

Risk Assessment of Potentially Genotoxic Impurities within the Framework of Quality by Design

Adam R. Looker, Michael P. Ryan, Bobbianna J. Neubert-Langille and Redouan Naji
Org. Process Res. Dev., 2010, 14 (4), pp 1032–1036
pp 1032–1036
Publication Date (Web): April 7, 2010 (Communication)
DOI: 10.1021/op900338g
Figure
Share
Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: