AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, WORLDDRUGTRACKER

Drafts of revised USP plastic packaging chapters <661.1> and <661.2>: removal of the biological reactivity test for oral and topical dosage forms

 regulatory  Comments Off on Drafts of revised USP plastic packaging chapters <661.1> and <661.2>: removal of the biological reactivity test for oral and topical dosage forms
Jul 142016
 

In a recent Pharmacopeial Forum two revised USP general chapters have been published for comment. With these drafts, the USP expert committee is removing the requirement for <87> Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vitro testing for packaging materials and systems for oral and topical dosage forms. Read more about the draft chapters of <661.1> Plastic Materials of Construction and <661.2> Plastic Packaging Systems for Pharmaceutical Use.testing for packaging materials and systems for oral and topical dosage forms. Read more about the draft chapters of <661.1> Plastic Materials of Construction and <661.2> Plastic Packaging Systems for Pharmaceutical Use.

read

http://www.gmp-compliance.org/enews_05453_Drafts-of-revised-USP-plastic-packaging-chapters–661.1–and–661.2–removal-of-the-biological-reactivity-test-for-oral-and-topical-dosage-forms_15493,15615,Z-PKM_n.html

 

In Pharmacopeial Forum 42(4) [Jun-Jul 2016] drafts of two revised USP general chapters <661.1> Plastic Materials of Construction and <661.2> Plastic Packaging Systems for Pharmaceutical Use have been published for comment. Deadline for comments is September 30, 2016. With these drafts, the USP General Chapters – Packaging and Distribution Expert Committee is removing the requirement for <87> Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vitro testing for packaging materials and systems for oral and topical dosage forms.

The Expert Committee is removing the requirement for <87> testing at this time, while the effort to revise the general chapters <87> and Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vivo <88> proceeds. Depending on the revisions of <87> and <88> the two packaging chapters may be revised to align with those chapters.

The new requirement (since May 2016) for <87> Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vitro testing for packaging materials and systems for oral and topical dosage forms has been highly discussed, since this testing is not required for the mentioned dosage forms according to EMA guideline on plastic immediate packaging materials (December 2005) and US FDA container closure guidance (May 1999). In case of oral and topical dosage forms both guidances require “only” compliance to food regulations (EU: regulation 10/2011, US: indirect food additives guidelines) or, if applicable, (preferably) to pharmacopoeial monographs (if the material or system is described in a pharmacopoeial chapter).

The principle of these two guidances is that materials considered safe for food contact are also safe for topical and oral dosage form packaging systems.

The new requirement (Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vitro) could have led to delays in releasing new oral or topical products on the market. Additionally, one might have had to re-evaluate already existing oral and topical products packaging systems on the market. Therefore, the present decision to revise the two packaging chapters regarding the requirement for <87>Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vitro seems to be justified.

Furthermore, the Expert Committee is proposing the addition of four new polymers [polyamide 6, polycarbonate, poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate), and polyvinyl chloride, plasticized] with test methods and specifications to general chapter <661.1>. To support the addition of these new polymers, polymer descriptions have been added to Evaluation of Plastic Packaging Systems and Their Materials of Construction with Respect to Their User Safety Impact <1661>, which appeared in PF 42(3) [May–June 2016].

In addition, the test for Spectral Transmission in Containers—Performance Testing <671> is being moved into general chapter <661.2> as requirement for light resistant containers.

On the basis of comments received, the scope of both chapters was revised for clarification.

After registration on the USP Pharmacopeial Forum website you can read the complete drafts of the two general chapters <661.1> and <661.2>.

 

Frequently Asked Questions: Plastic Materials of Construction <661.1> and Plastic Packaging Systems for Pharmaceutical Use <661.2>

  1. How do the newly revised General Chapters <661.1> and <661.2> impact currently marketed packaged pharmaceutical products?
  2. If a packaging system or component that gained regulatory approval with one product is used as a packaging system for a new product, would <661.1> and/or <661.2> testing be required?
  3. If a material of construction for a packaging system or component that has received regulatory approval is changed, is <661.1> and/or <661.2> testing required?
  4. Why does USP require <87> Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vitro testing for solid oral dosage forms?

  1. How do the newly revised General Chapters <661.1> and <661.2> impact currently marketed packaged pharmaceutical products?

    In order to market a drug product, defined as a dosage form plus its associated packaging system, the product must be evaluated for its suitability for use by the relevant regulatory authority. The purpose of <661.1> is to increase the likelihood that a packaging system will be suited for use by providing data about its material(s) of construction, whereas the purpose of <661.2> is to establish that the packaging system is suited for use. Because suitability for use has already been established for marketed products via regulatory review, <661.1> and <661.2> testing has no additional value in terms of establishing suitability for use. Thus, a packaging system and its materials of construction that have been evaluated by a regulatory authority and are used with a marketed dosage form are considered to already meet the requirements of <661.2> and <661.1> (see <1661> Evaluation of Plastic Packaging Systems and Their Materials of Construction with Respect to Their User Safety Impact and Table 1).

     

  2. If a packaging system or component that gained regulatory approval with one product is used as a packaging system for a new product, would <661.1> and/or <661.2> testing be required?

    If a packaging system (and its materials of construction) that is used with one marketed dosage form is used with a second, compositionally similar dosage form, and if the conditions of use are similar for the two dosage forms, neither <661.1> nor <661.2> testing is required. This is because the information used to establish the suitability for use with the approved product is relevant to and is typically sufficient for establishing the suitability for use with the new product.

    If the new drug product is compositionally different from the approved product, and/or the conditions of use are different, then <661.1> testing would not be required. This is because generally, <661.1> testing is not dependent on the dosage form composition or the conditions of use.

    The exception to this statement is when a packaging system for a marketed “low-risk” dosage form is used for a new “high-risk” dosage form. A dramatic change in the nature of the dosage form would require <661.1> testing. This is because <661.1> testing of materials used with “high-risk” dosage forms is more extensive than <661.1> testing of materials used with “low-risk” dosage forms. In this scenario, those tests that are required for both low- and high-risk dosage forms do not need to be repeated (for example, Identity, Physicochemical Tests, Extractable Metals, and <87> Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vitro). Those tests that are unique to the high-risk dosage forms (e.g., <88> Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vivo as appropriate and Plastic Additives) would need to be performed.

    A similar analysis is true for <661.2> testing of the packaging system. Biological Reactivity and Physicochemical Tests are not specifically linked to a dosage form or conditions of contact, thus the packaging system would not need to be tested for these attributes regardless of any differences in the composition or conditions of use between the approved and new drug products. However, as the generation and toxicological safety assessment of an extractables profile is influenced by the composition of the dosage form and the conditions of use, it may be necessary to perform the Chemical Safety Assessment (extractables profiling and toxicological safety) in <661.2>. Under <661.2>, any decision not to perform this Chemical Safety Assessment would need to be justified on a case-by-case basis.

    When a packaging system for a marketed “high-risk” dosage form is used for a new “low-risk” dosage form, <661.1> and <661.2> testing is not necessary. In this case, whatever information was used to establish the suitability for use with the “high-risk” dosage form would also establish the suitability for use with the “low-risk” dosage form, as the “high-risk” information would generally represent a worst case scenario for the “low-risk” situation (see <1661> Evaluation of Plastic Packaging Systems and Their Materials of Construction with Respect to Their User Safety Impact and Table 1).

     

  3. If a material of construction for a packaging system or component that has received regulatory approval is changed, is <661.1> and/or <661.2> testing required?

    As all materials of construction are required to meet <661.1>, it is expected that the new, different material would have to have been tested per <661.1>. Note that the new material would not be one of the legacy materials whose <661.1> compliance is “covered” by the fact that the product is being marketed.

    Use of a new and different material of construction in a packaging system can reasonably be anticipated to have an effect on the suitability for use of that packaging system. Thus, the new packaging system should be tested per <661.2>.

    Nevertheless, neither <661.1> nor <661.2> is intended to establish prescriptive requirements associated with exercising change control. Organizations are responsible for establishing their own change control practices, subject to approval by the appropriate regulatory authority. It is expected that those change control practices that do not specifically utilize <661.1> and <661.2> will include a justification for such practices, specifically focusing on the potential effect(s) that the change may have on user safety and product quality (see <1661> Evaluation of Plastic Packaging Systems and Their Materials of Construction with Respect to Their User Safety Impact and Table 1).

    Table 1. Guidance for Situations where <661.1> and <661.2> Testing would be Applicable

    Situation Required Testing
    General Situation Specific Circumstances <661.1> <661.2>
    Packaging system used with a currently marketed pharmaceutical product No No
    New packaging system that has not gained regulatory approval for use with a to-be-marketed pharmaceutical product Yes Yes
    Changes to a packaging system used with a currently marketed pharmaceutical product A new material is introduced into the packaging system Yes (for the new material) Yes
    A material of construction in the packaging system is changed in either composition or process Yes (for the changed material) Yes
    The packaging system is changed, in either composition or process, in a manner that does not involve a change in its materials or to its materials (for example, changing the thicknesses of individual layers in a multi-layered film) No Yes
    Packaging system used with a currently marketed pharmaceutical product is to be applied to a different pharmaceutical product Dosage form and conditions of use are similar for the current and different pharmaceutical products No No
    Dosage form and/or conditions of use are different from the current pharmaceutical products (moving from a “high risk” to “low risk” dosage form) No No
    Dosage form and/or conditions of use are different from the current pharmaceutical products (moving from a “low risk” to “high risk” dosage form) Yes Yes

    Note: The provisions in <661.2> for packaging systems must be met for components whose testing has been deemed to be necessary.

     

  4. Why does USP require <87> Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vitro testing for solid oral dosage forms?

    In general, the amount and type of testing required to verify the suitability of packaging systems and their materials of construction should be consistent with the risk that the system or material could be unsuitable. In addition, the risk that packaging systems would be unsuited for use for solid oral dosage forms is lower than the risk associated with other dosage forms. Recognizing these generalizations, <661.1> has different testing requirements and/or specifications for these two groups of dosage forms. Because some of the tests required in <661.1> are applicable regardless of dosage form (for example, Identity, Physicochemical Tests, and Extractable Metals), such tests are applied with no difference to both groups of dosage forms. Although both groups of dosage forms are required to address Biological Reactivity, <661.1> requires only Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vitro <87> for oral and topical dosage forms while requiring both Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vitro <87> and Biological Reactivity Tests, In Vivo <88> (as applicable) for all other dosage forms. Both groups are required to address Plastic Additives, but solid oral dosage forms address this aspect by making proper reference to FDA’s Indirect Food Additive regulations while the other dosage forms address this issue by specified Plastic Additives testing.

    A cornerstone of suitability for use assessment of packaging systems and their materials of construction is the concept of orthogonal assessment. This is because individual means of assessment are generally insufficiently robust or broad enough in scope to provide rigorous and complete assessments on their own. Thus orthogonal assessments are performed to essentially “fill in the gaps” in the individual assessments.

Q: What types of “plastic packaging systems” are used in the pharmaceutical industry?

A: Plastic packaging systems for pharmaceutical use include bags, bottles, vials, cartridges, metered-dose inhalers, prefillable syringes, pouches and closures for capsules and tablets. Plastic materials commonly used in these systems include polyethylene, polypropylene, polyolefins, and polyvinyl chloride, among others.

Plastic packaging systems can include—not only the container that holds a particular drug product—but also gaskets, rubber stoppers, tubing and other components that may be part of the overall system used to store and/or deliver a drug to the patient.

Q: What are the key quality considerations for manufacturers of plastic packaging systems for drug products?

A: As drug products are manufactured, packaged, and stored, they come into direct contact with packaging systems and their plastic materials of construction. Such contact may result in interactions between the drug product and its packaging system. The packaging systems must protect and be compatible with drug products and not compromise their stability, efficacy or safety. In turn, the ingredients of a drug product should not be absorbed onto the surface or migrate into the body of the plastic packaging system.

The use of well-characterized plastic materials of construction and the appropriate testing of packaging systems help to determine if adverse interactions are taking place. Manufacturers should be able to provide a rationale for using a particular raw material of a packaging system and characterize that material to know what can possibly come out of it (e.g., additives, extractable  metals). This is key to determining potential interactions with a drug product.

Q: What are extractables and leachables?

A: Extractables are organic and inorganic chemical compounds that can be extracted from packaging material under laboratory conditions. They can be released from a pharmaceutical packaging/delivery system, a packaging component or a packaging material of construction. Depending on the specific purpose of a particular extraction study, laboratory conditions (e.g., solvent, temperature) may accelerate or exaggerate the normal conditions of storage and use for a packaged dosage form. Extractables themselves (or substances derived from extractables) have the potential to leach into a drug product under normal conditions or storage and use and, thus, become leachables.

Leachables are extractables derived from drug packaging or delivery systems that may migrate into the drug product over the course of a drug product’s shelf life. Leachables can affect the stability and efficacy of the drug product, and in some extreme cases, introduce some patient safety risks.

Q: How can USP help?

A: The U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) is a nonprofit scientific organization that develops and revises public standards that help promote global drug quality. USP’s standards encompass drug substances, excipients, drug products and their delivery and packaging systems. These standards are available for use by industry, academia, regulators, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders.

USP’s published official standards—in the form of specifications for identity, strength, quality and purity in drug product, drug substance and excipient monographs as well as information and procedures in general chapters—appear in the compendia, U.S. Pharmacopeia—National Formulary (USP–NF).

Q: What USP standards are available to support work with plastic packaging systems, as well as extractables and leachables?

A: USP has developed the following standards specifically for plastic packaging systems:

  • General Chapter <661> Plastic Packaging Systems and their Materials of Construction: Testing rationale for plastic materials of construction and packaging systems used in the pharmaceutical industry. The use of well-characterized materials to construct a packaging system is a primary means of ensuring that the packaging system is suitable for its intended use since properties and characteristics of the materials can be matched to the performance requirements of the packaging system. (Current official standard, published in USP 38–NF 33.)
  • General Chapter <661.1> Plastic Materials of Construction: Tests, procedures and acceptance criteria for plastic materials of construction used in pharmaceutical packaging systems. Proper characterization of materials of construction facilitates the identification of and use of appropriate materials for pharmaceutical packaging systems. (New standard, becomes official May 1, 2016, published in USP 39–NF 34.)
  • General Chapter <661.2> Plastic Packaging Systems for Pharmaceutical Use: Safety aspects of a drug product’s packaging system based on appropriate chemical assessments, includes performing extractables testing, leachables testing, and toxicology assessment. (New standard, becomes official May 1, 2016, published in USP 39–NF 34.)
  • General Chapter <1663> Assessment of Extractables Associated with Pharmaceutical Packaging/Delivery Systems*: Framework for the design, justification and execution of an extractables assessment for pharmaceutical packaging and delivery systems. Establishes critical dimensions of an extractables assessment and discusses practical and technical aspects of each. Also examines critical dimensions of an extraction study—laboratory generation of the extract (extraction) and testing the extract (characterization). (Current official standard, published in USP 38–NF 33, S1.)
  • General Chapter <1664> Assessment of Drug Product Leachables Associated with Pharmaceutical Packaging/Delivery Systems*: Framework for the design, justification and implementation of assessments for drug-product leachables derived from pharmaceutical packaging and delivery systems. Covers: 1) the requirement for leachables studies; 2) fundamental concepts for leachables studies; 3) the basis of thresholds for leachables and general guidance and application of these thresholds; 4) design and implementation of leachables studies; 5) leachables method development and validation; 6) correlation of results from extractables assessment and routine extractables testing with leachables studies; and 7) establishment of leachables specification including acceptance criteria. (Current official standard, published in USP 38–NF 33, S1.)

*This chapter is for informational purposes, it does not establish specific conditions, analytical methods, specifications, or acceptance criteria for any particular dosage forms or packaging system or drug product combination. The principles and best practices outlined in this general chapter represent a unified interpretation of sound science and are applicable to situations in which extractables or leachables assessment is required for pharmaceutical application. 

Q: Does USP have plans to develop future standards for plastic packaging systems?

A: Yes, USP is currently developing a brand new chapter <661.3> Plastic Materials for Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Systems which will cover plastic components and systems used in the manufacturing of a drug products. The chapter is scheduled to be published for public review and comment in Pharmacopeial Forum 42 (3) May 2016.

In addition, we will be hosting a workshop June 20–21 on Material Biocompatibility and Standard for Plastic Manufacturing Systems/Components at our facility in Rockville, MD.

We encourage all interested parties to take advantage of these two new resources to learn more and contribute to the development of new USP standards for drug packaging systems.

//////////////////Drafts, revised USP,  plastic packaging chapters <661.1> and <661.2>,  removal of the biological reactivity test for oral and topical dosage forms

 

Share

EMA reviews Medicines manufactured at U.S. Company

 regulatory  Comments Off on EMA reviews Medicines manufactured at U.S. Company
Jul 142016
 

Following the issuance of two Non-Compliance Reports for two sites of the US based company, EMA has started a review of medicines manufactured by Pharmaceutics International Inc., USA.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has started a review of medicines manufactured by Pharmaceutics International Inc., USA. This follows the issuance of two Non-Compliance Reports for two sites of the US based company after an inspection in February 2016 conducted by the MHRA (the medicines regulatory agency in the United Kingdom) which highlighted several shortcomings in relation to good manufacturing practice (GMP).

Pharmaceutics International Inc. manufactures the centrally authorised medicine Ammonaps (sodium phenylbutyrate) and is also the registered manufacturing site for some other medicines that have been authorised through national procedures in the European Union (EU).

This inspection which was a follow-up to an inspection in June 2015 aimed to assess whether corrective measures agreed previously had been appropriately implemented. It found that shortcomings remained, which included insufficient measures to reduce the risk that traces of one medicine could be transferred to another (cross-contamination), as well as problems with the way data were generated and checked and deficiencies in the systems for ensuring medicines’ quality (quality assurance).

EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) will now review the impact of the inspection findings on the products’ overall benefits and risks and make a recommendation as to whether any changes are needed to their marketing authorisations.

There is no evidence that patients have been put at risk by this issue. However, as a precautionary measure, medicines from this site will no longer be supplied to the EU unless they are considered to be ‘critical’ to public health. Criticality will be assessed by national medicines regulatory agencies for their territories, taking into account alternatives and any impact of shortages on patients. In case where a medicine manufactured at this site is considered not critical in a member state it will no longer be supplied in this member state and any medicine remaining on the market will be recalled.

Source: EMA Press Release

Pharmaceutics International Inc., USA

/////////// EMA,  Medicines,  manufactured, U.S. Company, Pharmaceutics International Inc., USA

Share

Cipla to invest in South Africa’s first biosimilars production facility

 INDIA, MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES  Comments Off on Cipla to invest in South Africa’s first biosimilars production facility
Jul 142016
 

Cipla to invest in South Africa’s first biosimilars production facility
Indian-based pharmaceutical and biotechnology company Cipla will invest more than R1.3bn ($19.34m) in the first advanced biotech manufacturing facility in South Africa for the production of biosimilars.

Indian-based pharmaceutical and biotechnology company Cipla will invest more than R1.3bn ($19.34m) in the first advanced biotech manufacturing facility in South Africa for the production of biosimilars.

The investment will be carried out by South African subsidiary Cipla BioTec…………………cont

read at

http://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/news/newscipla-invest-south-africas-first-biosimilars-production-facility-4945516?WT.mc_id=DN_News

Cipla Managing director and global CEO Subhanu Saxena

 

Dr Y.K. Hamied,

Department of Trade and Industries Special Economic Zone of Dube Tradeport, DURBAN, SOUTHAFRICA

 

///Cipla, South Africa, biosimilars,  production facility, Dube Tradeport, Cipla BioTec Pvt Ltd, Durban, SOUTHAFRICA

Share

Besifloxacin hydrochloride (Besivance)

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Besifloxacin hydrochloride (Besivance)
Jul 132016
 

Besifloxacin.png

Besifloxacin

SS 734, BOL 303224A, ISV-403

MW 430.301, MF C19H21ClFN3O3

141388-76-3 CAS

7-[(3R)-3-aminoazepan-1-yl]-8-chloro-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid

(R)-(+)-7-(3-amino-2,3,4,5,6,7-hexahydro-1H-azepin-1-yl)-1,4-dihydro-4-oxoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid

(R) -7- (3- amino-hexahydro-azepin -1H- mushroom-1-yl) -8-chloro-1-cyclopropylmethyl -6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid

Synthesis of the molecule (R)-(+)-7-(3-amino-2,3,4,5,6,7-hexahydro-1H-azepin-1-yl)-1,4-dihydro-4-oxoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,447,926,

Besifloxacin is a fourth generation fluoroquinolone-type opthalmic antibiotic for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. FDA approved on May 28, 2009. by Bausch & Lomb, for the treatment of non-viral bacterial conjunctivitis

Besifloxacin, (+)-7-[(3R)-3-aminohexahydro-1H-azepin-1-yl]-8-chloro-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid hydrochloride, developed by SS Pharmaceutical (SSP) Co.Ltd. was a fourth-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic . Besifloxacin hydrochloride eye drop was used to treat bacterial conjunctivitis caused by aerobic and facultative Gram-positive microorganisms and aerobic and facultative Gram-negative microorganisms

Besifloxacin.png

Besifloxacin (INN/USAN) is a fourth-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic. The marketed compound is besifloxacin hydrochloride. It was developed by SSP Co. Ltd., Japan, and designated SS734. SSP licensed U.S. and European rights to SS734 for ophthalmic useto InSite Vision Incorporated (OTCBB: INSV) in 2000. InSite Vision developed an eye drop formulation (ISV-403) and conducted preliminary clinical trials before selling the product and all rights to Bausch & Lomb in 2003.[1]

The eye drop was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on May 29, 2009 and marketed under the trade name Besivance.[2]

Name Dosage Strength Route Labeller Marketing Start Marketing End
Besivance suspension 6 mg/mL ophthalmic Bausch & Lomb Incorporated 2009-05-28 Not applicable Us
Besivance suspension 0.6 % ophthalmic Bausch & Lomb Inc 2010-01-27 Not applicable Canada
Besivance suspension 6 mg/mL ophthalmic Physicians Total Care, Inc. 2011-07-13 Not applicable Us

405165-61-9 CAS

Besifloxacin Hydrochloride

Besifloxacin hydrochloride is a fourth-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic.
IC50 Value:
Target: Antibacterial
Besifloxacin has been found to inhibit production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro. Besifloxacin is a novel 8-chloro-fluoroquinolone agent with potent, bactericidal activity against prevalent and drug-resistant pathogens.besifloxacin is the most potent agent tested against gram-positive pathogens and anaerobes and is generally equivalent to comparator fluoroquinolones in activity against most gram-negative pathogens. Besifloxacin demonstrates potent, broad-spectrum activity, which is particularly notable against gram-positive and gram-negative isolates that are resistant to other fluoroquinolones and classes of antibacterial agents.

Clinical Information of Besifloxacin Hydrochloride

Product Name Sponsor Only Condition Start Date End Date Phase Last Change Date
Besifloxacin Hydrochloride Bucci Laser Vision Institute Bacterial infection 31-MAY-11 31-DEC-11 Phase 4 05-JUN-13
Bucci Laser Vision Institute 31-MAY-11 31-DEC-11 Phase 4 03-JUN-13
Innovative Medical Services 30-SEP-10 31-OCT-12 Phase 4 11-SEP-13
Ophthalmology Consultants, Ltd Cataract 30-SEP-10 28-FEB-11 Phase 4 11-SEP-13
University of Louisville Blepharitis 31-AUG-11 31-OCT-11 Phase 4 01-DEC-11

Pharmacodynamics

Besifloxacin is a fluoroquinolone that has a broad spectrum in vitro activity against a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negativeocular pathogens: e.g., Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum, Moraxella lacunata, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus hominis, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus salivarius. Besifloxacin has been found to inhibit production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro.[3] The mechanism of action of besifloxacin involves inhibition of two enzymes which are essential for the synthesis and replication of bacterial DNA: the bacterialDNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV.

Medical Use

Besifloxacin is indicated in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis caused by sensitive germs,[4] as well as in the prevention of infectious complications in patients undergoing laser therapy for the treatment of cataracts.[5][6]

Adverse Effects

During the treatment, the most frequently reported ocular adverse reaction was the appearance of conjunctival redness (approximately 2% of patients). Other possible adverse reactions, reported in subjects treated with besifloxacin were: eye pain, itching of the eye, blurred vision, swelling of the eye or eyelid.

MORE SYNTHESIS COMING, WATCH THIS SPACE…………………..

 

STR1

 

 

 

STR1

STR1

 

 

 

STR1

 

 

 

PATENT

WO 2010111116

https://www.google.com/patents/WO2010111116A1?cl=en

 

PATENT

CN 104592196

https://www.google.com/patents/CN104592196A?cl=en

STR1

The method comprises performing condensation reaction of 1-​cyclopropyl-​6,​7-​dichloro-​1,​4-​dihydro-​4-​oxy-​3-​quinoline carboxylic acid with (R)​-​3-​aminohexahydroazepine in the presence of org. base in org. solvent I at 45°C-​solvent b.p. temp. under refluxing, washing with acid, vacuum concg. to obtain (R)​-​7-​(3-​amino-​hexahydro-​1H-​azepine-​1-​yl)​-​1-​cyclopropyl-​6-​fluoro-​1,​4-​dihydro-​4-​oxy-​3-​quinoline carboxylic acid, dissolving in 5-​10 fold org. solvent II, reacting with thionyl chloride at 0-​40°C, and vacuum concg. to obtain (R) -7- (3- amino-hexahydro-azepin -1H- mushroom-1-yl) -8-chloro-1-cyclopropylmethyl -6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid hydrochloride

Preparation method of the present invention provides hydrochloride Besifloxacin, comprising the steps of:

(1), in three _6 flask of 1-cyclopropyl, 6,7-difluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid 10g of acetonitrile added 100mL, was added (R ) -3-amino-hexahydro-aza mushroom 4.73g and 7.2mL of triethylamine was heated at reflux for 5h TLC plate detection point, the reaction was complete spin dry plus 100mL dissolved in chloroform and then 200mL 1M hydrochloric acid and washed twice with saturated brine The organic phase to pH 4-6, the organic phase was poured into the jar and dried to obtain the single (R) -7- (3- amino-hexahydro-azepin -1H- leather-yl) cyclopropyl-6 -1_ fluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-3-quinoline-carboxylic acid in chloroform solution; spin-dried to give (R) -7- (3- amino-hexahydro-azepin -1H- leather-yl) cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-quinoline-3-carboxylic acid.

(2), obtained in the previous step (R) -7- (3_ atmosphere atmosphere -1H- gas hybrid group six leather-1-yl) cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4 _1_ dihydro-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid in chloroform solution was cooled to 0 ° C, was slowly added dropwise under constant stirring 18mL S0C12, temperature does not exceed 5 ° C added, the mixture was stirred at 0 ° C after 2h l to room temperature, TLC detection, after completion of the reaction was evaporated to dryness to column chromatography to give (R) -7- (3- amino-hexahydro-azepin -1H- mushroom-1-yl) -8-chloro-1-cyclopropylmethyl -6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid hydrochloride 5. 12g.

 

PATENT

US 20110144329

https://www.google.com/patents/US20110144329

EXAMPLE 1Preparation of Besifloxacin Free Base Solid

Besifloxacin free base was prepared from besifloxacin hydrochloride addition salt.

An amount of about 5 g of besifloxacin HCl (HCl addition salt of besifloxacin made, for example, by the method of U.S. Pat. No. 5,447,926; which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) was added to about 750 ml of water. The besifloxacin HCl was allowed to dissolve in said water. Twenty milliliters of 1N NaOH solution were added slowly to the besifloxacin aqueous solution while stirring (final pH 10.2). Besifloxacin free base started to precipitate. Eight milliliters of 1N HCl solution were added slowly while stirring (final pH of 9.7). The resulting mixture was allowed to mix for 2 hours while besifloxacin free base continued to precipitate. At the end of 2 hours, the precipitated besifloxacin free base was filtered through a Millipore type RA 1.2 μm filter. The besifloxacin free base thus collected was dried in a vacuum oven at room temperature. 4.35 g of besifloxacin free base was recovered.

FIG. 1 shows a UV absorption spectrum of besifloxacin free base starting material of Example 1.

FIG. 3 shows an IR spectrum of free base starting material of Example 1.

PATENT

https://www.google.com/patents/CN103044397A?cl=en

Figure CN103044397AD00041

Example 6 (R) -7_ (3- amino-hexahydro–1H- diazepan-1-yl) -8_ chloro-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4- Hydrogen oxo – quinoline-3-carboxylic acid (Besifloxacin). [0021] The reaction vessel was added chloroform (50ml) as a reaction solvent, in the case of a solid material was added with stirring (III) (3. 59g, O. Olmol), until the intermediate (III) is completely dissolved, was added dropwise under ice- chlorosulfonic acid, stirred for I hour under ice-cooling, gradually warmed to room temperature, stirred for 6 hours, and then reacted at reflux temperature for 6 hours. After completion of the reaction by TLC, the reaction solution was cooled to 0 ° C, white solid was precipitated, filtered, washed with a small amount of dichloromethane to give a crude product besifloxacin (3. 65g, 93. 01%). [0022] Example 7 (R) -7_ (3- amino-hexahydro–1H- diazepan-1-yl) -8_ chloro-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4- Hydrogen oxo – quinoline-3-carboxylic acid (Besifloxacin). [0023] The reaction vessel was added chloroform (50ml) as a reaction solvent, in the case of a solid material was added with stirring (III) (3. 59g, 0. Olmol), until the intermediate (III) is completely dissolved, was added dropwise under ice- chlorosulfonic acid was stirred for I hour under ice-cooling, gradually warmed to room temperature, stirred for 6 hours, and then reacted at reflux temperature for 12 hours. After completion of the reaction by TLC, the reaction solution was cooled to 0 ° C, the precipitated white solid was filtered , washed with a little dichloromethane to give Besifloxacin crude (3. 05g, 77. 22%).

PAPER

Molbank 2013, 2013(2), M801; doi:10.3390/M801
Short Note
(R)-7-(Azepan-3-ylamino)-8-chloro-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic Acid Hydrochloride
Supplementary File 3:Support Information (PDF, 340 KB)
Download PDF [188 KB, 27 May 2013; original version 22 May 2013]
R&D Center, Jiangsu Yabang Pharmaceutical Group, Changzhou 213200, China
In this paper (R)-7-(azepan-3-ylamino)-8-chloro-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid hydrochloride 1was isolated and identified as the N-substituted regioisomer of besifloxacin, which has been synthesized from the reaction of 8-chloro-1-cyclopropyl-6,7-difluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid 3 with (R)-tert-butyl 3-aminoazepane-1-carboxylate 2in acetonitrile as solvent in 37% yield. The chemical structure of compound 1 was established on the basis of 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, mass spectrometry data and elemental analysis

REGIOMER OF BESIFLOXACIN

 

Besifloxacin.pngBESIFLOXACIN

 

STR1

STR1

References

  1.  “InSite Vision Reaches Agreement to Sell ISV-403 to Bausch & Lomb” (Press release). InSite Vision. 2003-12-19. Retrieved 2009-08-15.
  2.  “Bausch & Lomb Receives FDA Approval of Besivance, New Topical Ophthalmic Antibacterial for the Treatment of Bacterial Conjunctivitis (“Pink Eye”)” (Press release). Bausch & Lomb. 2009-05-29. Retrieved 2009-05-29.
  3.  Zhang JZ, Ward KW (January 2008). “Besifloxacin, a novel fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent, exhibits potent inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines in human THP-1 monocytes”. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61 (1): 111–6. doi:10.1093/jac/dkm398. PMID 17965029.
  4.  Malhotra R, Ackerman S, Gearinger LS, Morris TW, Allaire C (December 2013). “The safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6 % used three times daily for 7 days in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis”. Drugs in R&D 13 (4): 243–52. doi:10.1007/s40268-013-0029-1. PMC 3851703. PMID 24142473. Retrieved 2015-01-06.
  5.  Majmudar PA, Clinch TE (May 2014). “Safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in cataract and LASIK surgery patients”. Cornea33 (5): 457–62. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000098. PMC 4195578. PMID 24637269. Retrieved 2015-01-06.
  6.  Nielsen SA, McDonald MB, Majmudar PA (2013). “Safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in refractive surgery: a retrospective chart review of post-LASIK patients”. Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) 7: 149–56. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S38279. PMC 3552478. PMID 23355771. Retrieved 2015-01-06.

 

CLIPS

Besifloxacin hydrochloride (Besivance) Besifloxacin is a fourth-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic which is marketed as besifloxacin hydrochloride. It was originally developed by the Japanese firm SSP Co. Ltd and designated SS734. SSP then licensed U.S. and European rights of SS734 for ophthalmic use to InSite Vision, Inc., in 2000, who then developed an eye drop formulation (ISV-403) and conducted preliminary clinical trials before selling the product and all rights to Bausch & Lomb in 2003.

The eye drop was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on May 29, 2009 and marketed under the trade name Besivance.24a

Besifloxacin has been found to inhibit production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro. The synthesis of besifloxacin commences with commercially available ethyl 3-(3-chloro-2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)-3-oxopropanoate (13, Scheme3).24b

Condensation of this ketoester with triethyl orthoformate resulted in a mixture of vinylogous esters 14. Substitution with cyclopropanamine converts 14 to the vinylogous amide 15 as an unreported distribution of cis- and trans-isomers. This mixture was treated with base at elevated temperature to give 16.

Presumably, the trans-isomer isomerizes to the cis-isomer, which subsequently undergoes an intramolecular nucleophilic aromatic substitution with concomitant saponification to construct quinolone acid 16.

Quinolone 16 is then subjected to another nucleophilic substitution involving readily available iminoazepine 17 and the displacement reaction proceeds regioselectively to furnish the atomic framework of besifloxacin (18).

Acidic methanolysis of 18 at elevated temperature gave besiflozacin (III).

str1

24. (a) Bertino, J. S.; Zhang, J.-Z. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2009, 10, 2545; (b) Harms, A. E.; Arul, R.; Soni, A. K. U.S. 2009561283 A1, 2009.

US5447926 * Sep 16, 1994 Sep 5, 1995 Ss Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Quinolone carboxylic acid derivatives
Citing Patent Filing date Publication date Applicant Title
CN104458945A * Nov 27, 2014 Mar 25, 2015 广东东阳光药业有限公司 Separation and measurement method of besifloxacin hydrochloride and isomer of besifloxacin hydrochloride
CN102659761A * Apr 27, 2012 Sep 12, 2012 常州亚邦制药有限公司 Method for preparing besifloxacin hydrochloride
US5385900 * Nov 8, 1993 Jan 31, 1995 Ss Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Quinoline carboxylic acid derivatives
Reference
1 * 黄山等: “克林沙星的 2, 4, 5-三氟苯甲酸路线合成“, 《中国医药工业杂志》, vol. 31, no. 8, 31 December 2000 (2000-12-31)
Citing Patent Filing date Publication date Applicant Title
CN103709100A * Dec 31, 2013 Apr 9, 2014 南京工业大学 Preparation method of 8-chloroquinolone derivatives
Besifloxacin
Besifloxacin.png
Besifloxacin-3D-balls.png
Systematic (IUPAC) name
7-[(3R)-3-Aminoazepam-1-yl]-8-chloro-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid
Clinical data
Trade names Besivance
AHFS/Drugs.com Monograph
MedlinePlus a610011
License data
Routes of
administration
Ophthalmic
Legal status
Legal status
Identifiers
CAS Number 141388-76-3
ATC code S01AE08 (WHO)
PubChem CID 10178705
ChemSpider 8354210
UNII BFE2NBZ7NX Yes
ChEMBL CHEMBL1201760
Chemical data
Formula C19H21ClFN3O3
Molar mass 393.84 g·mol−1
Patent Number Pediatric Extension Approved Expires (estimated)
US5,447,926 No 1995-09-05 2012-09-05 Us
US5447926 No 1996-04-13 2016-04-13 Us
US6,685,958 No 2004-02-03 2021-06-20 Us
US6,699,492 No 2004-03-02 2019-03-31 Us
US6685958 No 2001-06-29 2021-06-29 Us
US6699492 No 1999-03-31 2019-03-31 Us
US8415342 No 2010-11-07 2030-11-07 Us
US8481526 No 2011-01-09 2031-01-09 Us
US8604020 No 2010-03-12 2030-03-12 Us
US8937062 No 2009-11-13 2029-11-13 Us

 

  1. O’Brien TP: Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension, 0.6%: a novel topical fluoroquinolone for bacterial conjunctivitis. Adv Ther. 2012 Jun;29(6):473-90. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0027-7. Epub 2012 Jun 20. [PubMed:22729919 ]
  2. Proksch JW, Granvil CP, Siou-Mermet R, Comstock TL, Paterno MR, Ward KW: Ocular pharmacokinetics of besifloxacin following topical administration to rabbits, monkeys, and humans. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Aug;25(4):335-44. doi: 10.1089/jop.2008.0116. [PubMed:19492955 ]
  3. Besifloxacin Hydrochloride

    [1]. Wang Z, Wang S, Zhu F, Chen Z, Yu L, Zeng S. Determination of enantiomeric impurity in besifloxacin hydrochloride by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography with precolumn derivatization. Chirality. 2012 Jul;24(7):526-31. doi: 10.1002/chir.22042.
    Abstract
    Besifloxacin hydrochloride is a novel chiral broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone developed for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. R-besifloxacin hydrochloride is used in clinics as a consequence of its higher antibacterial activity. To establish an enantiomeric impurity determination method, some chiral stationary phases (CSPs) were screened. Besifloxacin enantiomers can be separated to a certain extent on Chiral CD-Ph (Shiseido Co., Ltd., Japan), Chiral AGP, and Crownpak CR (+) (Daicel Chemical IND., Ltd., Japan). However, the selectivity and sensitivity were both unsatisfactory on these three CSPs. Therefore, Chiral AGP, Chiral CD-Ph, and Crownpak CR (+) were not used in the enantiomeric impurity determination of besifloxacin hydrochloride. The separation of enantiomers of besifloxacin was further performed using a precolumn derivatization chiral high-performance liquid chromatography method. 2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-acetyl-beta-D-glucopyranosyl isothiocyanate was used as the derivatization reagent. Besifloxacin enantiomer derivates were well separated on a C(18) column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) with a mobile phase that consisted of methanol-KH(2)PO(4) buffer solution (20 mM; pH 3.0) (50:50, v/v). Selectivity, sensitivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, stability, and robustness of this method were all satisfied with the method validation requirement. The method was suitable for the quality control of enantiomeric impurity in besifloxacin hydrochloride.

    [2]. Hussar DA. New drugs: golimumab, besifloxacin hydrochloride, and artemether/lumefantrine. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Jul-Aug;49(4):570-4.

    [3]. Nafziger AN, Bertino JS Jr. Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension for bacterial conjunctivitis. Drugs Today (Barc). 2009 Aug;45(8):577-88.
    Abstract
    Besifloxacin hydrochloride ophthalmic suspension 0.6% (Besivance) is a recently approved fluoroquinolone for the topical treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. The drug is rapidly bactericidal against common bacterial pathogens causing conjunctivitis, i.e., coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae as well as against other less common organisms. In addition to being a potent agent against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens including those resistant to other fluoroquinolones, besifloxacin has balanced DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV activity, which should slow the development of resistance. Topical administration achieves high sustained concentrations in human tears and good ocular tissue penetration in animals while demonstrating an excellent safety profile. Besifloxacin’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics meet the criteria for successful eradication of many Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria while demonstrating minimal systemic exposure. The biochemical properties, achievement of target pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic goals and the restriction of besifloxacin to topical ophthalmic use should result in slower development of bacterial resistance, making besifloxacin a new, appealing option for empiric therapy in acute bacterial conjunctivitis.

    [4]. Proksch JW, Ward KW. Ocular pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of besifloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin following topical administration to pigmented rabbits. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Oct;26(5):449-58.
    Abstract
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the ocular pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship for besifloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin using rabbit ocular PK data, along with in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) values against methicillin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-CR) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE-CR).METHODS: Rabbits received a topical instillation of Besivance? (besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension, 0.6%), Vigamox (moxifloxacin hydrochloride ophthalmic solution, 0.5% as base), or Zymar (gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution, 0.3%), and ocular tissues and plasma were collected from 4 animals/treatment/collection time at 8 predetermined time intervals during the 24h after dosing. Ocular levels of each agent were measured by LC/MS/MS, and PK parameters (Cmax, Tmax, and AUC????) were determined. AUC????/MIC?? ratios were calculated for tears, conjunctiva, cornea, and aqueous humor using previously reported MIC??values for MRSA-CR and MRSE-CR.RESULTS: All of the fluoroquinolones tested demonstrated rapid penetration into ocular tissues after a single instillation. Besifloxacin demonstrated the highest exposure in tear fluid, while exposure in conjunctiva was comparable for all 3 compounds. Peak concentrations of all fluoroquinolones in aqueous humor were at or below ~1g/mL. In comparison with their MIC??values against MRSE-CR and MRSA-CR, besifloxacin achieved an AUC????/MIC?? ratio of ~800 in tears, compared with values of ≤10 for moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin. In cornea, conjunctiva, and aqueous humor, the AUC????/MIC?? ratios were <10 for all compounds. However, in these tissues AUC????/MIC?? ratios for besifloxacin were 1.5- to 38-fold higher than moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin….

    [5]. Comstock TL, Paterno MR, Usner DW, Pichichero ME. Efficacy and safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in children and adolescents with bacterial conjunctivitis: a post hoc, subgroup analysis of three randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, multicenter clinical trials. Paediatr Drugs. 2010 Apr 1;12(2):105-12. doi: 10.2165/11534380-000000000-00000.
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: Acute conjunctivitis is the most frequent eye disorder seen by primary care physicians and one that often affects children. Besifloxacin is a new topical fluoroquinolone, the first chlorofluoroquinolone, for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in patients aged 1-17 years with bacterial conjunctivitis.METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a subgroup of pediatric patients aged 1-17 years who had participated in three previously reported, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, multicenter, clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of besifloxacin in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. The studies were conducted in a community setting (clinical centers). All three clinical trials included children (aged > or = 1 year) with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial conjunctivitis in at least one eye, based on the presence at baseline of grade 1 or greater purulent conjunctival discharge and conjunctival injection, and pin-hole visual acuity of at least 20/200 in both eyes for verbal patients. Two trials were vehicle controlled; the third trial was comparator controlled (moxifloxacin hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.5% as base). In all studies, besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% was administered as one drop in the affected eye(s) three times daily, at approximately 6-hourly intervals, for 5 days. The main outcome measures were clinical resolution and microbial eradication at visit 2 (day 4 +/- 1 in one study; day 5 +/- 1 in the other two studies) and visit 3 (day 8 or 9). Data from the two vehicle-controlled studies were combined for the assessments to provide greater statistical power.RESULTS: This analysis included 815 pediatric patients aged 1-17 years (447 with culture-confirmed bacterial conjunctivitis). Clinical resolution was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in the besifloxacin group than in the vehicle group at both visit 2 (53.7% vs 41.3%) and visit 3 (88.1% vs 73.0%). Similarly, microbial eradication was significantly higher with besifloxacin than with vehicle at visit 2 (85.8% vs 56.3%) and visit 3 (82.8% vs 68.3%). No significant differences in clinical resolution and microbial eradication were noted between besifloxacin and moxifloxacin. Besifloxacin was well tolerated, with similar incidences of adverse events in the besifloxacin, vehicle, and moxifloxacin groups.CONCLUSION: Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% was shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis in children and adolescents aged 1-17 years.

///////Besifloxacin hydrochloride, Besivance, Besifloxacin, SS734, 141388-76-3, 405165-61-9, BOL 303224A, ISV-403, Bausch & Lomb, treatment of non-viral bacterial conjunctivitis

Fc1c(c(Cl)c2c(c1)C(=O)C(\C(=O)O)=C/N2C3CC3)N4CCCC[C@@H](N)C4

Share

Virtue Insight invites you to the 9th Biosimilars Congregation 2016, 22nd Sept 2016, The Lalit Hotel, Mumbai, India

 CONFERENCE  Comments Off on Virtue Insight invites you to the 9th Biosimilars Congregation 2016, 22nd Sept 2016, The Lalit Hotel, Mumbai, India
Jul 132016
 

STR1

9th Biosimilars Congregation 2016 during 22nd September 2016 Mumbai,  INDIA

22nd September 2016, The Lalit Hotel, Mumbai, India

Link http://www.virtueinsight.com/pharma/9th-Biosimilars-Congregation-2016/

ANINDITA DAS

ANINDITA DAS

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories

MANISH VERMA

MANISH VERMA

Sanofi

DEBOLINA PARTAP

DEBOLINA PARTAP

Wockhardt

PARIKSHIT CHAUDHARI

PARIKSHIT CHAUDHARI

Nestle

HANMANT BARKATE

HANMANT BARKATE

Intas Pharmaceuticals

CONFERENCE INTRODUCTION:-

Virtue Insight invites you to the 9th Biosimilars Congregation 2016 during 22nd September 2016 Mumbai – India. This 9th Biosimilars Congregation 2016 brings together scientists, researchers and CROs from around the world. Biologics are a highly effective class of medicines that are based on naturally occurring proteins and produced using living cells. Current concepts of drugs and biologics, Unique considerations for biologics, Early clinical development essentials, Cancer therapeutics, Comparability for Biologics, Biosimilar approvals are the points of discussion in this session.

9th Biosimilars Congregation 2016 conference will bring together top pharmaceutical, biotechnology and regulatory representatives under one roof that will address the key issues of the industry. Hence, this global event will look at the multiple facets of biosimilars, ranging from the evolving regulatory landscapes, biosimilar guidelines to the legal and economic aspects and current challenges in biosimilar development. This biosimilar conference will focus on multiple aspects of biosimilar product development to successfully deliver safe, biosimilar products to the market place. By attending this biologics conference you will gain a comprehensive outlook on the key issues surrounding biosimilars. This event will provide an important platform for biosimilars stakeholders to discuss and share best practices in expediting development in Biosimilars 2016 and onwards.

 

KEY THEMES DISCUSSED IN THIS CONFERENCE:-

  • Global biopharma policy & market trends
  • The future of biosimilars in India
  • The evolving biosimilar sector: Trends and Implications
  • Complex biological models in biosimilar development
  • Viable extrapolation strategies for biosimilars with special emphasis on TNF antagonists
  • Effectively communicate the value of biosimilar products to raise confidence in the class
  • Improving characterization of biosimilars with technology
  • Create a robust patient services and reimbursement support program for biosimilar products
  • The future of the biosimilar industry – mapping the evolution and development of the biosimilar sector
  • Forecasting the financial growth of biosimilars in the global healthcare marketplace
  • Planning of a biosimilar development project – what to consider from the very beginning
  • Clinical development strategies for biosimilars
  • Gaining Better Market Access: Is Commercial CMO Acceptable for the Biosimilars Market?
  • Regulatory Updates and Development
  • Be part of a major networking opportunity

 

WHO WILL YOU MEET:-

CSOs, CMOs, Vice Presidents, Presidents, Heads, Directors, Team Leaders, and Senior Scientists from the following roles:

  • Biopharmaceuticals/ Biotherapeutics
  • Follow on Biologics/Follow on Proteins
  • Biologics/Biotechnology/ Biogenerics
  • Legal Affairs
  • Intellectual Property
  • Health Economics
  • Pricing and Reimbursement
  • Clinical Immunology
  • Principal Scientist
  • Chief Scientific Officer
  • Process Control and Analytical Technologies
  • Analytical Characterisation
  • Regulatory Compliance
  • Pharmacovigilance
  • Drug Safety & Risk Management
  • Quality Affairs/ Quality Control
  • New Product Development
  • Process Science
  • Portfolio Management
  • Research & Development
  • Business Development
  • Business Operations
  • Scientific Affairs
  • Commercial Affairs

 

WHY SHOULD YOU ATTEND?

Get more from the event, with a broader scope bringing the whole communications value chain together? Enjoy and make the best out of ourdedicated networking drinks time, meet the leading international vendors showcasing the products of tomorrow in the co-located exhibition.Expand your knowledge of the latest business models and strategies in the high-level conference. Whether you are on the branded or generic side, you cannot afford to miss this opportunity to benchmark your tactics and strategies against the industry leaders who will be the first to traverse the pathway. Devise an immediate action plan for your biosimilar prosecution and litigation strategies in light of the barriers to entry, research and development costs, and regulatory hurdles, which are balanced against an enormous potential for increased profit margin

Fen Castro

Fen Castro

Head – Productions

Virtue Insight

Tel (India) –       + 91 44 64614333

Mobile (India) –  + 91 9003 26 0693

Tel (UK) –          + 44 2036120886

Fen Castro fen@virtuefirms.com
Cc: Siddhaarth siddhaarth@virtueinsight.co.in

Link http://www.virtueinsight.com/pharma/9th-Biosimilars-Congregation-2016/

 

//////

Share

Stereoselective synthesis of tricyclic compounds by intramolecular palladium-catalyzed addition of aryl iodides to carbonyl groups

 SYNTHESIS  Comments Off on Stereoselective synthesis of tricyclic compounds by intramolecular palladium-catalyzed addition of aryl iodides to carbonyl groups
Jul 122016
 

1860-5397-12-118.

 

Stereoselective synthesis of tricyclic compounds by intramolecular palladium-catalyzed addition of aryl iodides to carbonyl groups

Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Chemie und Biochemie, Takustrasse 3, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
Email of corresponding author Corresponding author email     hreissig@chemie.fu-berlin.de
This article is part of the Thematic Series “Organometallic chemistry” and is dedicated to the memory of Professor Peter Hofmann.
Guest Editor: B. F. Straub
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 1236–1242.
doi:10.3762/bjoc.12.118

Jakub Saadi, Christoph Bentz, Kai Redies, Dieter Lentz, Reinhold Zimmer, Hans-Ulrich ReissigEmail of corresponding author

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 1236–1242. published 16 Jun 2016

Abstract

Starting from γ-ketoesters with an o-iodobenzyl group we studied a palladium-catalyzed cyclization process that stereoselectively led to bi- and tricyclic compounds in moderate to excellent yields. Four X-ray crystal structure analyses unequivocally defined the structure of crucial cyclization products. The relative configuration of the precursor compounds is essentially transferred to that of the products and the formed hydroxy group in the newly generated cyclohexane ring is consistently in trans-arrangement with respect to the methoxycarbonyl group. A transition-state model is proposed to explain the observed stereochemical outcome. This palladium-catalyzed Barbier-type reaction requires a reduction of palladium(II) back to palladium(0) which is apparently achieved by the present triethylamine.

For our systematic studies on samarium diiodide promoted cyclizations leading to benzannulated medium-sized rings [1-4] we required starting materials such as alkenyl-substituted compounds B (Scheme 1). Obvious precursors for B are aryl iodides A that smoothly undergo palladium-catalyzed coupling reactions to provide the desired products. However, in one case [A: R1–R2 = (CH2)4] typical Heck reaction conditions employing styrene as olefin component not only led to the desired styrene derivative B but mainly to the cyclized product C. If the reaction was performed without the olefin it provided only the tertiary alcohol C in reasonable yield [5]. Similar C–C bond forming reactions of aryl halides that involve an insertion of the intermediate aryl palladium species into a carbonyl group are relatively rare (see discussion below). Therefore this serendipitous discovery led us to investigate the reaction in more detail.

[1860-5397-12-118-i1]
Scheme 1: Planned Heck reaction of A to compound B and serendipitous discovery of the palladium-catalyzed cyclization to products C.

Conclusion

We have found new examples of intramolecular palladium-catalyzed nucleophilic additions of aryl iodides to alkyl ketones. These additions proceed in the presence of only 2–5 mol % Pd(PPh3)4 and afford bi- and tricyclic compounds with excellent stereoselectivity and in moderate to very good efficacy. The low mass balance observed in several cases may be due to subsequent reactions such as simple de-iodination of the precursor compounds or elimination of water in the products. However, in general none of these byproducts has been isolated. For compound 2 the bulky isopropyl group slows down the addition to the carbonyl group and an enolate arylation was observed instead as major reaction pathway. Although the scope of the discovered aryl iodide addition to carbonyl groups may be limited it is attractive since only low catalyst loadings are required and interesting products are formed with high stereoselectivity.

STR1

Methyl (2RS,4SR)-4-hydroxy-4-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-2-carboxylate

Methyl (2RS,4SR)-4-hydroxy-4-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-2-carboxylate (7): According to the GP1: compound 1 (108 mg, 0.31 mmol), Pd(PPh3)4 (7 mg, 6 µmol), NEt3 (102 mg, 1.01 mmol), DMF (1.5 mL), 110 °C, 3 d. Column chromatography (silica gel, hexanes/ethyl acetate 4:1 to 1:1) provided 24 mg (35%) of 7 as colorless oil.

1H NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz): δ = 1.66 (s, 3 H, Me), 1.83 (sbr, 1 H, OH), 1.92 (dd, J = 13.7, 12.7 Hz, 1 H, 3-H), 2.33 (ddd, J = 13.7, 2.8, 2.1 Hz, 1 H, 3-H), 2.93-2.96 (m, 1 H, 1-H), 3.04 (ddd, J = 12.7, 4.5, 2.8 Hz, 1 H, 2-H), 3.09 (dddd, J = 15.4, 4.5, 2.1, 0.5 Hz, 1 H, 1-H), 3.74 (s, 3 H, CO2Me), 7.14 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H, Ar), 7.22 (td, J = 7.4, 1.4 Hz, 1 H, Ar), 7.25 (t, J ≈ 7.4 Hz, 1 H, Ar), 7.55 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.4 Hz, 1 H, Ar) ppm.

13C NMR (CDCl3, 176 MHz): δ = 30.0 (q, Me), 32.7 (t, C-1), 36.3 (d, C-2), 41.6 (t, C-3), 69.7 (s, C-4), 126.0, 127.0, 127.8, 129.2, 134.6, 140.4 (4 d, 2 s, Ar), 51.8, 175.7 (q, s, CO2Me) ppm.

IR (neat): ν̃= 3470 (O-H), 3060, 3020 (=C-H), 2950, 2850 (C-H), 1730 (C=O) cm-1 .

HRMS (ESI-TOF): C13H16O3 Na+ calcd.: 243.0992; found: 243.0984. EA: C13H16O3 (220.3) calcd. (%): C 70.89, H 7.32; found (%): C 70.71, H 7.15.

 

 

/////////1,2-addition,  aryl iodides,  ketones,  nucleophilic addition,  palladium catalysis,

Share

Multicomponent reactions: A simple and efficient route to heterocyclic phosphonates

 SYNTHESIS  Comments Off on Multicomponent reactions: A simple and efficient route to heterocyclic phosphonates
Jul 122016
 

1860-5397-12-121.

Multicomponent reactions: A simple and efficient route to heterocyclic phosphonates

Mohammad Haji

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 1269–1301. published 21 Jun 2016

Chemistry Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Email of corresponding author Corresponding author email     mh_1395@yahoo.com
Associate Editor: T. J. J. Müller
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 1269–1301.

doi:10.3762/bjoc.12.121

Abstract

Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) are one of the most important processes for the preparation of highly functionalized organic compounds in modern synthetic chemistry. As shown in this review, they play an important role in organophosphorus chemistry where phosphorus reagents are used as substrates for the synthesis of a wide range of phosphorylated heterocycles. In this article, an overview about multicomponent reactions used for the synthesis of heterocyclic compounds bearing a phosphonate group on the ring is given.

http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/single/articleFullText.htm?publicId=1860-5397-12-121&vt=f&tpn=0&bpn=home

Conclusion

In this article the use of different multicomponent reactions (MCRs) for the synthesis of heterocyclic phosphonates has been reviewed. This review demonstrates the synthetic potential of multicomponent reactions for the construction of phosphono-substituted heterocyclic rings. The Kabachnik–Fields reaction can be considered the starting point of multicomponent synthesis of this class of compounds. However, the major advancements in this interesting field have been achieved in recent years. More than 75% of the cited literature in this review has been published within the last six years, of which more than three quarters dealt with the synthesis of new heterocyclic phosphonates from non-heterocyclic phosphorus reagents. The remaining works reported the phosphorylation of parent heterocyclic systems. It is worth mentioning, that most of the cited publications focused on the synthesis of five and six-membered rings and only four articles described the synthesis of three and seven-membered heterocycles. Additionally, the majority of the reported syntheses were devoted to the development of new methodologies including the use of advanced catalytic systems, alternative solvents and microwave irradiation. Thus, the development of novel MCR based on phosphorous reagents would allow the synthesis of macrocyclic and medium or large-sized heterocyclic systems, substances which are currently underrepresented in the literature. Further, the design of new biocompatible scaffolds such as β-lactams and peptidomimetics possessing phosphonate groups by MCR-based strategies would significantly extend the synthetic potential of MCRs towards heterocyclic phosphonates

//////////multicomponent reactions,  organophosphorus chemistry,  phosphorus reagents,  phosphorylated heterocycles

Share

OSILODROSTAT for Treatment of Cushing’s Syndrome

 Phase 3 drug  Comments Off on OSILODROSTAT for Treatment of Cushing’s Syndrome
Jul 122016
 

ChemSpider 2D Image | osilodrostat | C13H10FN3

OSILODROSTAT

LCI 699, LCI 699NX

Novartis Ag INNOVATOR

UNII-5YL4IQ1078, CAS 928134-65-0

Benzonitrile, 4-[(5R)-6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl]-3-fluoro-
4-[(5R)-6,7-Dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl]-3-fluorobenzonitrile
(R)-4-(6,7-Dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[l,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro- benzonitrile
  • Molecular FormulaC13H10FN3
  • Average mass227.237 Da
  • Originator Novartis
  • Class Antihypertensives; Fluorobenzenes; Imidazoles; Nitriles; Pyridines; Small molecules
  • Mechanism of Action Aldosterone synthase inhibitors
  • Phase III Cushing syndrome
  • Phase I Liver disorders
  • Discontinued Heart failure; Hypertension; Solid tumours

Most Recent Events

  • 27 Feb 2016 Novartis plans the phase III LINC-4 trial for Cushing’s syndrome in Greece, Thailand, Poland, Turkey, Russia, Brazil, Belgium, Spain, Denmark, Switzerland and USA (PO) (NCT02697734)
  • 12 Jun 2015 Novartis plans a phase II trial for Cushing syndrome in Japan (NCT02468193)
  • 01 Apr 2015 Phase-I clinical trials in Liver disorders in USA (PO)

 

Osilodrostat phosphate
CAS: 1315449-72-9

MF, C13-H10-F-N3.H3-O4-P

MW, 325.2347

  • LCI 699AZA

An orally active aldosterone-synthase inhibitor.

for Treatment of Cushing’s Syndrome

4-((5R)-6,7-Dihydro-5H-pyrrolo(1,2-c)imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluorobenzonitrile dihydrogen phosphate

Aromatase inhibitor; Cytochrome P450 11B1 inhibitor

MORE SYNTHESIS COMING, WATCH THIS SPACE…………………..

 

 

SYNTHESIS

STR1

ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 4(12), 1203-1207; 2013

REMIND ME,  amcrasto@gmail.com, +919323115463

Osilodrostat, as modulators of 11-β-hydroxylase, useful for treating a disorder ameliorated 11-β-hydroxylase inhibition eg Cushing’s disease, hypertension, congestive heart failure, metabolic syndrome, liver diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, migraine headaches, osteoporosis or prostate cancer.

Novartis is developing osilodrostat, an inhibitor of aldosterone synthase and aromatase, for treating Cushing’s disease. In July 2016, osilodrostat was reported to be in phase 3 clinical development.

The somatostatin analog pasireotide and the 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor osilodrostat (LCI699) reduce cortisol levels by distinct mechanisms of action. There exists a scientific rationale to investigate the clinical efficacy of these two agents in combination. This manuscript reports the results of a toxicology study in rats, evaluating different doses of osilodrostat and pasireotide alone and in combination. Sixty male and 60 female rats were randomized into single-sex groups to receive daily doses of pasireotide (0.3mg/kg/day, subcutaneously), osilodrostat (20mg/kg/day, orally), osilodrostat/pasireotide in combination (low dose, 1.5/0.03mg/kg/day; mid-dose, 5/0.1mg/kg/day; or high dose, 20/0.3mg/kg/day), or vehicle for 13weeks. Mean body-weight gains from baseline to Week 13 were significantly lower in the pasireotide-alone and combined-treatment groups compared to controls, and were significantly higher in female rats receiving osilodrostat monotherapy. Osilodrostat and pasireotide monotherapies were associated with significant changes in the histology and mean weights of the pituitary and adrenal glands, liver, and ovary/oviduct. Osilodrostat alone was associated with adrenocortical hypertrophy and hepatocellular hypertrophy. In combination, osilodrostat/pasireotide did not exacerbate any target organ changes and ameliorated the liver and adrenal gland changes observed with monotherapy. Cmax and AUC0-24h of osilodrostat and pasireotide increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner. In conclusion, the pasireotide and osilodrostat combination did not exacerbate changes in target organ weight or toxicity compared with either monotherapy, and had an acceptable safety profile; addition of pasireotide to the osilodrostat regimen may attenuate potential adrenal gland hyperactivation and hepatocellular hypertrophy, which are potential side effects of osilodrostat monotherapy.

The somatostatin analog pasireotide and the 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor osilodrostat (LCI699) reduce cortisol levels by distinct mechanisms of action. There exists a scientific rationale to investigate the clinical efficacy of these two agents in combination. This manuscript reports the results of a toxicology study in rats, evaluating different doses of osilodrostat and pasireotide alone and in combination. Sixty male and 60 female rats were randomized into single-sex groups to receive daily doses of pasireotide (0.3 mg/kg/day, subcutaneously), osilodrostat (20 mg/kg/day, orally), osilodrostat/pasireotide in combination (low dose, 1.5/0.03 mg/kg/day; mid-dose, 5/0.1 mg/kg/day; or high dose, 20/0.3 mg/kg/day), or vehicle for 13 weeks. Mean body-weight gains from baseline to Week 13 were significantly lower in the pasireotide-alone and combined-treatment groups compared to controls, and were significantly higher in female rats receiving osilodrostat monotherapy. Osilodrostat and pasireotide monotherapies were associated with significant changes in the histology and mean weights of the pituitary and adrenal glands, liver, and ovary/oviduct. Osilodrostat alone was associated with adrenocortical hypertrophy and hepatocellular hypertrophy. In combination, osilodrostat/pasireotide did not exacerbate any target organ changes and ameliorated the liver and adrenal gland changes observed with monotherapy. Cmax and AUC0–24h of osilodrostat and pasireotide increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner.

In conclusion, the pasireotide and osilodrostat combination did not exacerbate changes in target organ weight or toxicity compared with either monotherapy, and had an acceptable safety profile; addition of pasireotide to the osilodrostat regimen may attenuate potential adrenal gland hyperactivation and hepatocellular hypertrophy, which are potential side effects of osilodrostat monotherapy.

The somatostatin class is a known class of small peptides comprising the naturally occurring somatostatin- 14 and analogues having somatostatin related activity, e.g. as disclosed by A.S. Dutta in Small Peptides, Vol.19, Elsevier (1993). By “somatostatin analogue” as used herein is meant any straight-chain or cyclic polypeptide having a structure based on that of the naturally occurring somatostatin- 14 wherein one or more amino acid units have been omitted and/or replaced by one or more other amino radical(s) and/or wherein one or more functional groups have been replaced by one or more other functional groups and/or one or more groups have been replaced by one or several other isosteric groups. In general, the term covers all modified derivatives of the native somatostatin- 14 which exhibit a somatostatin related activity, e.g. they bind to at least one of the five somatostatin receptor (SSTR), preferably in the nMolar range. Commonly known somatostatin analogs are octreotide, vapreotide, lanreotide, pasireotide.

Pasireotide, having the chemical structure as follow:

Figure imgf000002_0001

Pasireotide is called cyclo[{4-(NH2-C2H4-NH-CO-0-)Pro}-Phg-DTrp-Lys-Tyr(4-Bzl)- Phe], wherein Phg means -HN-CH(C6H5)-CO- and Bzl means benzyl, in free form, in salt or complex form or in protected form.

Cushing’s syndrome is a hormone disorder caused by high levels of Cortisol in the blood. This can be caused by taking glucocorticoid drugs, or by tumors that produce Cortisol or adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) or CRH. Cushing’s disease refers to one specific cause of the syndrome: a tumor (adenoma) in the pituitary gland that produces large amounts of ACTH, which elevates Cortisol. It is the most common cause of Cushing’s syndrome, responsible for 70% of cases excluding glucocorticoid related cases. The significant decrease of Cortisol levels in Cushing’s disease patients on pasireotide support its potential use as a targeted treatment for Cushing’s disease (Colao et al. N Engl J Med 2012;366:32^12).

Compound A is potent inhibitor of the rate-limiting enzyme 1 1-beta-hydroxylase, the last step in the synthesis of Cortisol. WO 201 1/088188 suggests the potential use of compound A in treating a disease or disorder characterised by increased stress hormone levels and/or decreased androgen hormone levels, including the potential use of compound A in treating heart failure, cachexia, acute coronary syndrome, chronic stress syndrome, Cushing’s syndrome or metabolic syndrome.

Compound A, also called (R)-4-(6,7-Dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[l,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro- benzonitrile, has formula (II).

Figure imgf000003_0001

Compound A can be synthesized or produced and characterized by methods as described in WO2007/024945.

PRODUCT PATENT

WO2007024945, hold protection in the EU states until August 2026, and expire in the US in March 2029 with US154 extension

PAPER

ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2013), 4(12), 1203-1207.

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ml400324c?source=chemport&journalCode=amclct

Discovery and in Vivo Evaluation of Potent Dual CYP11B2 (Aldosterone Synthase) and CYP11B1 Inhibitors

Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, 100 Technology Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936, United States
ACS Med. Chem. Lett., 2013, 4 (12), pp 1203–1207
DOI: 10.1021/ml400324c
*(E.L.M.) Tel: 617-871-7586. Fax: 617-871-7045. E-mail: erik.meredith@novartis.com.
Abstract Image

Aldosterone is a key signaling component of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and as such has been shown to contribute to cardiovascular pathology such as hypertension and heart failure. Aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) is responsible for the final three steps of aldosterone synthesis and thus is a viable therapeutic target. A series of imidazole derived inhibitors, including clinical candidate 7n, have been identified through design and structure–activity relationship studies both in vitro and in vivo. Compound 7n was also found to be a potent inhibitor of 11β-hydroxylase (CYP11B1), which is responsible for cortisol production. Inhibition of CYP11B1 is being evaluated in the clinic for potential treatment of hypercortisol diseases such as Cushing’s syndrome.

PATENT

WO-2016109361

silodrostat (LCI699; 4-[(5R)-6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[l,2-c]imidazol-5-yl]-3-fluoro-benzonitrile; CAS# 928134-65-0). Osilodrostat is a Ι Ι-β-hydroxylase inhibitor.

Osilodrostat is currently under investigation for the treatment of Cushing’s disease, primary aldosteronism, and hypertension. Osilodrostat has also shown promise in treating drug-resistant hypertension, essential hypertension, hypokalemia, hypertension, congestive heart failure, acute heart failure, heart failure, cachexia, acute coronary syndrome, chronic stress syndrome, Cushing’s syndrome, metabolic syndrome, hypercortisolemia, atrial fibrillation, renal failure, chronic renal failure, restenosis, sleep apnea, atherosclerosis, syndrome X, obesity, nephropathy, post-myocardial infarction, coronary heary disease, increased formation of collagen, cardiac or myocardiac fibrosis and/or remodeling following hypertension and endothelial dysfunction, Conn’s disease, cardiovascular diseases, renal dysfunction, liver diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, vascular diseases, retinopathy, neuropathy, insulinopathy, edema, endothelial dysfunction, baroreceptor dysfunction, migraine headaches, arrythmia, diastolic dysfunction, diastolic heart failure, impaired diastolic filling, systolic dysfunction, ischemia, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, sudden cardia death, impaired arterial compliance, myocardial necrotic lesions, vascular damage, myocardial infarction, left ventricular hypertrophy, decreased ej ection fraction, cardiac lesions, vascular wall hypertrophy, endothelial thickening, fibrinoid, necrosis of coronary arteries, ectopic ACTH syndrome, change in adrenocortical mass, primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease (PPNAD), Carney complex (CNC), anorexia nervosa, chronic alcoholic poisoning, nicotine withdrawal syndrome, cocaine withdrawal syndrome, posttraumatic stress syndrome, cognitive impairment after a stroke or cortisol-induced mineral corticoid excess, ventricular arrythmia, estrogen-dependent disorders, gynecomastia, osteoporosis, prostate cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia, polycyctic ovarian disease, infertility, fibrocystic breast disease, breast cancer, and fibrocystic mastopathy. WO 2013109514; WO 2007024945; and WO 2011064376.

Osilodrostat

Osilodrostat is likely subject to extensive CYP45o-mediated oxidative metabolism. These, as well as other metabolic transformations, occur in part through polymorphically-expressed enzymes, exacerbating interpatient variability. Additionally, some metabolites of osilodrostat derivatives may have undesirable side effects. In order to overcome its short half-life, the drug likely must be taken several times per day, which increases the probability of patient incompliance and discontinuance. Adverse effects associated with osilodrostat include fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, headache, hypokalemia, muscle spasms, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, abdominal pain, arthralgia, arthropod bite, dizziness, increased lipase, and pruritis.

Scheme I

 

EXAMPLE 1

(R)-4-(6,7-dihvdro-5H-pyrrolo[l,2-elimidazol-5-yl)-3-fluorobenzonitrile

(osilodrostat)

[00144] 4-(bromomethyl)-3-fluorobenzonitrile: 3-Fluoro-4-methylbenzonitrile (40 g, 296 mmol), NBS (63.2 g, 356 mmol) and benzoyl peroxide (3.6 g, 14.8 mmol) were taken up in carbon tetrachloride (490 mL) and refiuxed for 16 h. The mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated and purified via flash column chromatography (0-5% EtOAc/hexanes) to give 4-(bromomethyl)-3-fluorobenzonitrile (35.4 g, 56%).

[00145] 2-(l-trityl-lH-imidazol-4-yl)acetic acid: Trityl chloride (40 g, 143.88 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was added to a suspension of (lH-imidazol-4-yl) acetic acid hydrochloride (20 g, 123.02 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in pyridine (200 mL). This was stirred at 50 °C for 16 h. Then the mixture was cooled and concentrated under vacuum and the crude product was purified by recrystallization from ethyl acetate (1000 ml) to afford 42 g (90%) of 2-[l-(triphenylmethyl)-lH-imidazol-4-yl] acetic acid as an off-white solid. LCMS (ESI): m/z = 369.2 [M+H]+

Step 2

2 step 2

2-( 1 -trityl- lH-imidazol-4-yl)ethanol : 2-(l-Trityl-lH-imidazol-4-yl) acetic acid (42 g, 114.00 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was suspended in THF (420 mL) and cooled to 0 °C. To this was added BH3 (1M in THF, 228.28 mL, 2.0 equiv). The clear solution obtained was stirred at 0 °C for 60 min, then warmed to room temperature until LCMS indicated completion of the reaction. The solution was cooled again to 0 °C and quenched carefully with water (300 mL). The resulting solution was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 x 100 mL) and the organic layers combined and dried over anhydrous Na2S04 and evaporated to give a sticky residue which was taken up in ethanolamine (800 mL) and heated to 90 °C for 2 h. The reaction was transferred to a separatory funnel, diluted with EtOAc (1 L) and washed with water (3 x 600 mL). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2S04 and evaporated afford 35 g (87%) of 2-[l-(triphenylmethyl)-lH-imidazol-4-yl]ethanol as a white solid, which was used in the next step without further purification. LCMS (ESI) : m/z = 355.1 [M+H]+.

Step 3

3 step 3 4

4-(2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)ethyl)-l-trityl-lH-imidazole: 2-(l-Trityl-lH-imidazol-4-yl) ethanol (35 g, 98.75 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was dissolved in DCM (210 mL). To this was added imidazole (19.95 g, 293.05 mmol, 3.00 equiv) and tert-butyldimethylsilylchloride (22.40 g, 149.27 mmol, 1.50 equiv). The mixture was stirred at room temperature until LCMS indicated completion of the reaction. Then the resulting solution was diluted with 500 mL of DCM. The resulting mixture was washed with water (3 x 300 mL). The residue was purified by a silica gel column, eluted with ethyl

acetate/petroleum ether (1 :4) to afford 40 g (77%) of 4-[2-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]ethyl]-l-(triphenylmethyl)-lH-imidazole as a white solid. LCMS (ESI) : m/z = 469.1 [M+H]+.

Step 4

4-((5-(2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy )ethylVlH-iniidazol-l -vnmethylV3-fluorobenzonitrile: 4-(2-((tert-Butyldimethylsilanyl)oxy)ethyl)-l rityl-lH-irnidazole (40 g, 85.34 mmol, 1.00 equiv) and 4-(Bromomethyl)-3-fluorobenzonitrile (27.38 g, 127.92 mmol, 1.50 equiv) obtained as a product of step 0, were dissolved in MeCN (480 mL) and DCM (80 mL), and stirred at room temperature for 48 h. Et2NH (80 mL) and MeOH (480 mL) were then added and the solution was warmed 80 °C for 3 h. The solution was evaporated to dryness and the residue was purified via flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexanes 1 :5 to EtOAc) to afford 4-((5-(2-((tert-Butyldimethylsilanyl)oxy)ethyl)-lH-imidazol-l -yl)methyl)-3-fluorobenzonitrile (15 g, 50%). ¾ NMR (400 MHz, CDCh) δ: 7.67 (s, 1H), 7.43 (m, 2H), 6.98 (s, 1H), 6.88-6.79 (m, 1H), 5.34 (s, 2H), 3.79 (t, J= 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.67 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 0.88 (s, 9H), 0.02 (s, 6H). LCMS (ESI) : m/z = 360.1 [M+H]+.

Step 5

5 6

Methyl 2-(5-(2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)ethyl)-lH-imidazol-l -yl)-2-(4-cvano-2-fluorophenvDacetate: 4-((5-(2-((tert-Butyldimethylsilanyl)oxy)ethyl)-lH-imidazol-l -yl)methyl)-3-fluorobenzonitrile (15 g, 41.72 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was dissolved in anhydrous THF (150 mL) and stirred at -78 °C, then a THF solution of LiHMDS (75 mL, 1.80 equiv, 1.0 M) was added dropwise over 15 min. After 30 min, methyl cyanoformate (4.3 g, 45.50 mmol, 1.10 equiv) was added dropwise over 10 min and the solution was stirred at -78 °C for 2 h. The excess LiHMDS was quenched with aqueous saturated NH4CI and the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature. The mixture was then diluted with EtOAc and washed

with aqueous saturated NH4CI (200 mL). The organic layers was dried over anhydrous Na2S04 and evaporated. The crude residue was purified via flash column chromatography (EtOAc/PE 3: 10 to EtOAc) to give methyl 2-(5-(2-((tert-butyldimethylsilanyl)oxy)ethyl)-lH-imidazol-l-yl)-2-(4-cyano-2-fluorophenyl) acetate (15 g, 86%) as a light yellow solid.

¾ NMR (400 MHz, CDCL3) δ: 7.66 (s, 1H), 7.54-7.43 (m, 2H), 7.15 (t, J= 8.0 Hz 1H), 6.93 (s, 1H), 6.47 (s, 1H), 3.88-3.74 (m, 5H), 2.81-2.62 (m, 2H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.05 (s, 6H) . LCMS (ESI) : m/z = 418.2 [M+H]+.

Step 6

Methyl 2-(4-cvano-2-fluorophenyl)-2-(5-(2-hvdroxyethyl)-lH-imidazol-l-yl) acetate: Methyl 2-(5-(2-((tert-butyldimethylsilanyl)oxy)ethyl)-lH-imidazol-l-yl)-2-(4-cyano-2-fiuorophenyl)acetate (15 g, 35.92 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was added to a solution of HCl in 1,4-dioxane (89 mL, 4.0 M, 359.2 mmol) at 0 °C and the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 2 h. The solution was concentrated to dryness to give the crude alcohol, methyl 2-(4-cyano-2-fluorophenyl )-2-(5-(2 -hydroxy ethyl)-lH-imidazol-l-yl)acetate (10 g, 92%), which was used without further purification. LCMS: m/z = 304.0 [M+H]+.

Step 7

7 8

Methyl 2-(4-cvano-2-fluorophenyl)-2-(5-(2-(methylsulfonyloxy)ethyl)-lH-imidazol-l-yl) acetate: The crude methyl 2-(4-cyano-2-fluorophenyl )-2-(5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-lH-imidazol-l-yl)acetate (10 g, 32.97 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was dissolved in DCM (200 mL) and stirred at 0 °C, then Et3N (20 g, 197.65 mmol, 6.00 equiv) and

methanesulfonyl chloride (4.52 g, 39.67 mmol, 1.20 equiv) were added. After completion of the reaction, the solution was diluted with DCM and washed with aqueous saturated

NaHCC . The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2S04, filtered and evaporated to give the crude methyl 2-(4-cyano-2-fluorophenyl)-2-(5-(2-((methylsulfonyl)oxy)ethyl)-lH-imidazol-l-yl)acetate (11.43 g, 91%), which was used in the next step without further purification. LCMS (ESI) : m/z = 382.0 [M+H]+.

Step 8

Methyl 5-(4-cvano-2-fluorophenyl)-6.7-dihvdro-5H-pyrrolo[1.2-elimidazole-5-carboxylate: The crude methyl 2-(4-cyano-2 -fluorophenyl )-2-(5-(2- ((methylsulfonyl)oxy)ethyl)-lH-imidazol-l-yl)acetate (11.43 g, 29.97 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was dissolved in MeCN (550 mL) and then K2CO3 (12.44 g, 90.01 mmol, 3.00 equiv), Nal (13.50 g, 90.00 mmol, 3.00 equiv) and Et3N (9.09 g, 89.83 mmol, 3.00 equiv) were added. The reaction was stirred at 80 °C for 42 h. The mixture was filtered. The solids were washed with DCM. The filtrate was concentrated and purified by flash column chromatography (EtOAc) to give methyl 5-(4-cyano-2-fluorophenyl)-6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[l,2-c]imidazole-5-carboxylate (4.2 g, 49% in 3 steps).

[00153] ¾ NMR (400 MHz, CDCb) δ: 7.61 (s, 1H), 7.47-7.47 (m, 2H), 6.88 (s, 1H), 6.79-6.75 (m, 1H), 4.17-4.12 (m, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.78-3.70 (m, 1H), 3.08-3.02 (m, 1H), 2.84-2.71 (m, 2H). LCMS (ESI) : m/z = 286.0 [M+H]+.

Step 9

10

4-(6.7-dihvdro-5H-pyrrolo[1.2-elimidazol-5-yl)-3-fluorobenzonitrile: To a 40-mL sealed tube, was placed methyl 5-(4-cyano-2-fluorophenyl)-5H,6H,7H-pyrrolo[l,2-c]imidazole-5-carboxylate (1 g, 3.51 mmol, 1.00 equiv), DMSO (10 mL), water (5 mL). The final reaction mixture was irradiated with microwave radiation for 40 min at 140 °C. The resulting solution was diluted with 100 mL of EtOAc. The resulting mixture was washed with (3 x 20 mL) brine, dried over anhydrous Na2S04, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by a silica gel column, eluted with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (4: 1) to afford 420 mg (44%) of 5-(4-cyano-2-fluorophenyl)-5H,6H,7H-pyrrolo[l,2-c]irnidazole-5-carboxylic acid as a light yellow solid.

¾ NMR (400 MHz, CDCL3) δ: 7.55-7.28 (m, 3H), 6.90-6.85 (m, 2H), 5.74-5.71 (m, 1H), 3.25-3.15 (m, 1H), 3.02-2.92 (m, 2H), 2.58-2.50 (m, 1H). LCMS (ESI) : m/z = 228.2 [M+H]+.

Step 10

10

(R)-4-(6 -dihvdro-5H-pyrrolo[1.2-elirnidazol-5-yl)-3-fluorobenzonitrile:

Resolution of the enantiomers of the title compound (300 mg) was performed by chiral HPLC: Column, Chiralpak IA2, 2*25cm, 20um; mobile phase, Phase A: Hex (50%, 0.1% DEA), Phase B: EtOH (50%) ; Detector, UV 254/220 nm to afford the (S)-enantiomer (RT = 17 min) and the (R)-enantiomer (97.6 mg, desired compound) (RT = 21 min).

 ¾ NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-<4) δ: 7.98-7.95 (m, 1H), 7.70-7.69 (m, 1H), 7.50 (s, 1H), 6.87 (t, J= 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 5.79-5.76 (m, 1H), 3.15-3.06 (m, 1H), 2.92-2.74 (m, 2H), 2.48-2.43 (m, 1H). LCMS (ESI) : m/z = 228.1 [M+H]+.

 

PATENT

WO2013/153129

https://www.google.com/patents/WO2013153129A1?cl=en

 

PATENT

WO2007/024945

http://www.google.co.in/patents/WO2007024945A1?cl=en

 

PATENT

 EP 2815749

Aspect (iii) of the present invention relates to phosphate salt or nitrate salt of 4-(R)-(6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro-benzonitrile according to Formula (III)

Figure imgb0004

abbreviated as ‘{drug3}’. In particular, the present invention relates to crystalline form of phosphate salt of 4-(R)-(6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro-benzonitrile, abbreviated as ‘{drug3a}’; to crystalline Form A of phosphate salt of 4-(R)-(6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro-benzonitrile, abbreviated as ‘{drug3b}’; to crystalline Form B of phosphate salt of 4-(R)-(6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro-benzonitrile, abbreviated as ‘{drug3c}’; to crystalline Form C of phosphate salt of 4-(R)-(6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro-benzonitrile, abbreviated as ‘{drug3d}’; to crystalline Form D of phosphate salt of 4-(R)-(6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro-benzonitrile, abbreviated as ‘{drug3e}’; to crystalline Form E of phosphate salt of 4-(R)-(6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro-benzonitrile, abbreviated as ‘{drug3f}’; to crystalline Form F of phosphate salt of 4-(R)-(6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro-benzonitrile, abbreviated as ‘{drug3g}’; to crystalline Form G of phosphate salt of 4-(R)-(6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro-benzonitrile, abbreviated as ‘{drug3h}’; to crystalline Form H of phosphate salt of 4-(R)-(6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro-benzonitrile, abbreviated as ‘{drug3i}’; and to crystalline form of nitrate salt of 4-(R)-(6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-5-yl)-3-fluoro-benzonitrile, abbreviated as ‘{drug3j}’. {drug3a}, {drug3b}, {drug3c}, {drug3d}, {drug3e}, {drug3f}, {drug3g}, {drug3h}, {drug3i}, and {drug3j} are specific forms falling within the definition of {drug3}. Aspect (iii) of the invention is separate from aspects (i), (ii), (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), and (viii) of the invention. Thus, all embodiments of {drug3a}, {drug3b}, {drug3c}, {drug3d}, {drug3e}, {drug3f}, {drug3g}, {drug3h}, {drug3i}, and {drug3j}, respectively, are only related to {drug3}, but neither to {drug1}, nor to {drug2}, nor to {drug4}, nor to {drug5}, nor to {drug6}, nor to {drug7}, nor to {drug8}.

 

PAPER

Osilodrostat (LCI699), a potent 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, administered in combination with the multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analog pasireotide: A 13-week study in rats

  • a Preclinical Safety, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, East Hanover, NJ, USA
  • b Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, East Hanover, NJ, USA
  • c Novartis Oncology Development, Basel, Switzerland

doi:10.1016/j.taap.2015.05.004http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041008X15001684

CLIPS

STR1

 

STR1

WO2011088188A1 * Jan 13, 2011 Jul 21, 2011 Novartis Ag Use of an adrenal hormone-modifying agent
Reference
1 * BOSCARO M ET AL: “Treatment of Pituitary-Dependent Cushing’s Disease with the Multireceptor Ligand Somatostatin Analog Pasireotide (SOM230): A Multicenter, Phase II Trial“, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, vol. 94, no. 1, January 2009 (2009-01), pages 115-122, XP002698507, ISSN: 0021-972X

 

REFERENCES

1: Guelho D, Grossman AB. Emerging drugs for Cushing’s disease. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2015 Sep;20(3):463-78. doi: 10.1517/14728214.2015.1047762. Epub 2015 Jun 2. PubMed PMID: 26021183.

2: Li L, Vashisht K, Boisclair J, Li W, Lin TH, Schmid HA, Kluwe W, Schoenfeld H, Hoffmann P. Osilodrostat (LCI699), a potent 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, administered in combination with the multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analog pasireotide: A 13-week study in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2015 Aug 1;286(3):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 14. PubMed PMID: 25981165.

3: Papillon JP, Adams CM, Hu QY, Lou C, Singh AK, Zhang C, Carvalho J, Rajan S, Amaral A, Beil ME, Fu F, Gangl E, Hu CW, Jeng AY, LaSala D, Liang G, Logman M, Maniara WM, Rigel DF, Smith SA, Ksander GM. Structure-Activity Relationships, Pharmacokinetics, and in Vivo Activity of CYP11B2 and CYP11B1 Inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2015 Jun 11;58(11):4749-70. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00407. Epub 2015 May 21. PubMed PMID: 25953419.

4: Fleseriu M. Medical treatment of Cushing disease: new targets, new hope. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2015 Mar;44(1):51-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Nov 4. Review. PubMed PMID: 25732642.

5: Wang HZ, Tian JB, Yang KH. Efficacy and safety of LCI699 for hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and systematic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(2):296-304. Review. PubMed PMID: 25683946.

6: Daniel E, Newell-Price JD. Therapy of endocrine disease: steroidogenesis enzyme inhibitors in Cushing’s syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015 Jun;172(6):R263-80. doi: 10.1530/EJE-14-1014. Epub 2015 Jan 30. Review. PubMed PMID: 25637072.

7: Fleseriu M, Petersenn S. Medical therapy for Cushing’s disease: adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors and glucocorticoid receptor blockers. Pituitary. 2015 Apr;18(2):245-52. doi: 10.1007/s11102-014-0627-0. PubMed PMID: 25560275.

8: Ménard J, Rigel DF, Watson C, Jeng AY, Fu F, Beil M, Liu J, Chen W, Hu CW, Leung-Chu J, LaSala D, Liang G, Rebello S, Zhang Y, Dole WP. Aldosterone synthase inhibition: cardiorenal protection in animal disease models and translation of hormonal effects to human subjects. J Transl Med. 2014 Dec 10;12:340. doi: 10.1186/s12967-014-0340-9. PubMed PMID: 25491597; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4301837.

9: Oki Y. Medical management of functioning pituitary adenoma: an update. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014;54(12):958-65. Epub 2014 Nov 29. PubMed PMID: 25446388.

10: Cai TQ, Stribling S, Tong X, Xu L, Wisniewski T, Fontenot JA, Struthers M, Akinsanya KO. Rhesus monkey model for concurrent analyses of in vivo selectivity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of aldosterone synthase inhibitors. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2015 Jan-Feb;71:137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 7. PubMed PMID: 25304940.

11: Lother A, Moser M, Bode C, Feldman RD, Hein L. Mineralocorticoids in the heart and vasculature: new insights for old hormones. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;55:289-312. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124302. Epub 2014 Sep 10. Review. PubMed PMID: 25251996.

12: Cuevas-Ramos D, Fleseriu M. Treatment of Cushing’s disease: a mechanistic update. J Endocrinol. 2014 Nov;223(2):R19-39. doi: 10.1530/JOE-14-0300. Epub 2014 Aug 18. Review. PubMed PMID: 25134660.

13: Yin L, Hu Q, Emmerich J, Lo MM, Metzger E, Ali A, Hartmann RW. Novel pyridyl- or isoquinolinyl-substituted indolines and indoles as potent and selective aldosterone synthase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2014 Jun 26;57(12):5179-89. doi: 10.1021/jm500140c. Epub 2014 Jun 5. PubMed PMID: 24899257.

14: Li W, Luo S, Rebello S, Flarakos J, Tse FL. A semi-automated LC-MS/MS method for the determination of LCI699, a steroid 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, in human plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014 Jun 1;960:182-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Apr 30. PubMed PMID: 24814004.

15: Trainer PJ. Next generation medical therapy for Cushing’s syndrome–can we measure a benefit? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Apr;99(4):1157-60. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1054. PubMed PMID: 24702012.

16: Bertagna X, Pivonello R, Fleseriu M, Zhang Y, Robinson P, Taylor A, Watson CE, Maldonado M, Hamrahian AH, Boscaro M, Biller BM. LCI699, a potent 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, normalizes urinary cortisol in patients with Cushing’s disease: results from a multicenter, proof-of-concept study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Apr;99(4):1375-83. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2117. Epub 2013 Dec 11. PubMed PMID: 24423285.

17: Oki Y. Medical management of functioning pituitary adenoma: an update. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014;54 Suppl 3:958-65. PubMed PMID: 26236804.

18: Schumacher CD, Steele RE, Brunner HR. Aldosterone synthase inhibition for the treatment of hypertension and the derived mechanistic requirements for a new therapeutic strategy. J Hypertens. 2013 Oct;31(10):2085-93. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328363570c. PubMed PMID: 24107737; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3771574.

19: Brown NJ. Contribution of aldosterone to cardiovascular and renal inflammation and fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013 Aug;9(8):459-69. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2013.110. Epub 2013 Jun 18. Review. PubMed PMID: 23774812; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3922409.

20: van der Pas R, de Herder WW, Hofland LJ, Feelders RA. Recent developments in drug therapy for Cushing’s disease. Drugs. 2013 Jun;73(9):907-18. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0067-6. Review. PubMed PMID: 23737437.

///////OSILODROSTAT, Novartis ,  osilodrostat, an inhibitor of aldosterone synthase and aromatase, treating Cushing’s disease,  July 2016, phase 3 clinical development, LCI 699, 928134-65-0, 1315449-72-9, PHASE 3, LCI 699NX, LCI 699AZA, CYP11B1 CYP11B2

c1cc(c(cc1C#N)F)[C@H]2CCc3n2cnc3.OP(=O)(O)O

N#CC1=CC=C([C@H]2CCC3=CN=CN32)C(F)=C1

Share

TEZACAFTOR, VX 661 for treatment of cystic fibrosis disease.

 Phase 3 drug  Comments Off on TEZACAFTOR, VX 661 for treatment of cystic fibrosis disease.
Jul 112016
 

VX-661.png

ChemSpider 2D Image | Tezacaftor | C26H27F3N2O6

img

2D chemical structure of 1152311-62-0

TEZACAFTOR, VX 661

CAS : 1152311-62-0;

  • Molecular FormulaC26H27F3N2O6
  • Average mass520.498 Da

l-(2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-N-[l-[(2R)-2,3-dihydroxypropyl]-6-fluoro-2-(2-hydroxy-l,l-dimethylethyl)-lH-indol-5-yl]-cyclopropanecarboxamide).

(R)-1-(2,2-difluorobenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-N-(1-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-6-fluoro-2-(1-hydroxy-2-methylpropan-2-yl)-1H-indol-5-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide

Cyclopropanecarboxamide, 1-(2,2-difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-N-[1-[(2R)-2,3-dihydroxypropyl]-6-fluoro-2-(2-hydroxy-1,1-dimethylethyl)-1H-indol-5-yl]-

1-(2,2-difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-N-[1-[(2R)-2,3-dihydroxypropyl]-6-fluoro-2-(1-hydroxy-2-methylpropan-2-yl)indol-5-yl]cyclopropane-1-carboxamide

Cyclopropanecarboxamide, 1-(2,2-difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-N-(1-((2R)-2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-6-fluoro-2-(2-hydroxy-1,1-dimethylethyl)-1H-indol-5-yl)-

1-(2,2-difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-N-(1-((2R)-2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-6-fluoro-2-(2-hydroxy-1,1-dimethylethyl)-1H-indol-5-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide

Vertex (INNOVATOR)

 

UNII: 8RW88Y506K

In July 2016, this combination was reported to be in phase 3 clinical development.

Tezacaftor, also known asVX-661, is CFTR modulator. VX-661 is potentially useful for treatment of cystic fibrosis disease. Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by defects in the CF transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene, which encodes an epithelial chloride channel. The most common mutation, Δ508CFTR, produces a protein that is misfolded and does not reach the cell membrane. VX-661 can correct trafficking of Δ508CFTR and partially restore chloride channel activity. VX-661 is currently under Phase III clinical trial.

VX-661 is an orally available deltaF508-CFTR corrector in phase III clinical trials at Vertex for the treatment of cystic fibrosis in patients homozygous to the F508del-CFTR mutation

Novel deuterated analogs of a cyclopropanecarboxamide ie tezacaftor (VX-661), as modulators of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) proteins, useful for treating a CFTR-mediated disorder eg cystic fibrosis.

VX-661 (CAS #: 1152311-62-0; l-(2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-N-[l-[(2R)-2,3-dihydroxypropyl]-6-fluoro-2-(2-hydroxy-l,l-dimethylethyl)-lH-indol-5-yl]-cyclopropanecarboxamide). VX-661 is a cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator. VX-661 is currently under investigation for the treatment of cystic fibrosis. VX-661 has also shown promise in treating sarcoglycanopathies, Brody’s disease, cathecolaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, limb girdle muscular dystrophy, asthma, smoke induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, chronic bronchitis, rhinosinusitis, constipation, pancreatitis, pancreatic insufficiency, male infertility caused by congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD), mild pulmonary disease, idiopathic pancreatitis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), liver disease, hereditary emphysema, hereditary hemochromatosis, coagulation-fibrinolysis deficiencies, such as protein C deficiency, type 1 hereditary angioedema, lipid processing deficiencies, such as familial hypercholesterolemia, type 1 chylomicronemia, abetalipoproteinemia, lysosomal storage diseases, such as I-cell disease/pseudo-Hurler, mucopolysaccharidoses, Sandhof/Tay-Sachs, Crigler-Najjar type II, polyendocrinopathy/hyperinsulinemia, diabetes mellitus, Laron dwarfism, myeloperoxidase deficiency, primary hypoparathyroidism, melanoma, glycanosis CDG type 1, congenital hyperthyroidism, osteogenesis imperfecta, hereditary hypofibrinogenemia, ACT deficiency, diabetes insipidus (DI), neurohypophyseal DI, nephrogenic DI, Charcot-Marie tooth syndrome, Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease, neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, progressive supranuclear palsy, Pick’s disease, polyglutamine neurological disorders such as Huntington’s, spinocerebellar ataxia type I, spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy, dentatombral pallidoluysian, and myotonic dystrophy, as well as spongifiorm encephalopathies, such as hereditary Creutzfeldt- Jakob disease (due to prion protein processing defect), Fabry disease, Gerstrnarm-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, dry-eye disease, or Sjogren’s disease, osteoporosis, osteopenia, bone healing and bone growth (including bone repair, bone regeneration, reducing bone resorption and increasing bone deposition), Gorham’s Syndrome, chloride channelopathies such as myotonia congenita (Thomson and Becker forms), Bartter’s

syndrome type III, Dent’s disease, hyperekplexia, epilepsy, lysosomal storage disease, Angelman syndrome, and primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), a term for inherited disorders of the structure and/or function of cilia, including PCD with situs inversus (also known as Kartagener syndrome), PCD without situs inversus, and ciliary aplasia. WO 2014086687; WO2013185112.

VX-661

VX-661 is likely subject to extensive CYP45o-mediated oxidative metabolism. These, as well as other metabolic transformations, occur in part through polymorphically-expressed enzymes, exacerbating interpatient variability. Additionally, some metabolites of VX-661 may have undesirable side effects. In order to overcome its short half-life, the drug likely must be taken several times per day, which increases the probability of patient incompliance and discontinuance.Deuterium Kinetic Isotope Effect

PATENT

WO 2016109362

 

Scheme I

EXAMPLE 1

(R)-l-(2,2-difluorobenzo[dl[l,31dioxol-5-vn-N-(l-q,3-dihvdroxypropyn-6-fluoro-2-(l- hvdroxy-2-methylpropan-2-yl)-lH-indol-5-yl)cvclopropanecarboxamide

(VX-661)

Methyl 2.2-difluorobenzo[dl [1.31dioxole-5-carboxylate: To a 200 mL pressure tank reactor (10 atm. in CO), was placed 5-bromo-2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxole (20.0 g, 84.4 mmol, 1.00 equiv), methanol (40 mL), triethylamine (42.6 g, 5.00 equiv.), Pd2(dba)3 (1.74 g, 1.69 mmol, 0.02 equiv), Pd(dppf)Cl2 (1.4 g, 1.69 mmol, 0.02 equiv.). The resulting solution was stirred at 85 °C under an atmosphere of CO overnight and the reaction progress was monitored by GCMS. The reaction mixture was cooled. The solids were filtered out. The organic phase was concentrated under vacuum to afford 17.5 g of methyl 2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxole-5-carboxylate as a crude solid, which was used directly in the next step. Step 2

2 step 2 3

(2.2-difluorobenzo[dl [ 1.31 dioxol-5 -vDmethanol : To a 500mL 3-necked round-bottom flask purged and maintained with an inert atmosphere of nitrogen were placed methyl 2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxole-5-carboxylate (17.5 g, 81.01 mmol, 1.00 equiv.), tetrahydrofuran (200 mL). This was followed by the addition of L1AIH4 (6.81 mg, 162.02 mmol, 2.00 equiv.) at 0 °C. The resulting solution was stirred for 1 h at 25 °C and monitored by GCMS. The reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C until GCMS indicated the completion of the reaction. The pH value of the solution was adjusted to 8 with sodium hydroxide (1 mol/L). The solids were filtered out. The organic layer combined and concentrated under vacuum to afford 13.25 g (87%) of (2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methanol as yellow oil.

Step 3

step 3

5-(chloromethyl)-2.2-difluorobenzo[diri.31dioxole: (2.2-difluoro-2H-1.3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methanol (13.25 g, 70.4 mmol, 1.00 equiv.) was dissolved in DCM (200 mL). Thionyl chloride (10.02 g, 1.20 equiv.) was added to this solution. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 hours and then concentrated under vacuum. The residue was then diluted with DCM (500 mL) and washed with 2 x 200 mL of sodium bicarbonate and 1 x 200 mL of brine. The mixture was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and evaporated to afford 12.36 g (85%) of 5-(chloromethyl)-2,2-difluoro-2H-l ,3-benzodioxole as yellow oil.

Step 4

step 4 5

[00160] 2-(2.2-difluorobenzordi ri .31dioxol-5-yl)acetonitrile: 5-(chloromethyl)-2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxole (12.36 g, 60 mmol, 1.00 equiv.) was dissolved in DMSO (120 mL). This was followed by the addition of NaCN (4.41 g, 1.50 equiv.) with the inert temperature below 40 °C. The resulting solution was stirred for 2 hours at room temperature. The reaction progress was monitored by GCMS. The reaction was then quenched by the addition of 300 mL of water/ice. The resulting solution was extracted with 3 x 100 mL of ethyl acetate. The organic layers combined and washed with 3 x 100 mL brine dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum to afford 10.84 g (92%) of 2-(2,2-difluoro-2H-l ,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)acetonitrile as brown oil.

Step 5

l -(2.2-difluoro-2H-1.3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cvclopropane-l -carbonitrile: To a 100 mL round-bottom flask purged and maintained with an inert atmosphere of nitrogen, were placed 2-(2,2-difluoro-2H-l ,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)acetonitrile (10.84 g, 55 mmol, 1.00 equiv.),

NaOH (50%) in water), 1 -bromo-2-chloroethane (11.92g, 82.5 mmol, 1.50 equiv.), BmNBr

(361 mg, 1.1 mmol, 0.02 equiv.). The resulting solution was stirred for 48 h at 70 °C. The reaction progress was monitored by GCMS. The reaction mixture was cooled. The resulting solution was extracted with 3 x 200 mL of ethyl acetate and the organic layers combined. The resulting mixture was washed with 1 x 200 mL of brine. The mixture was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum to afford 10.12g of 1 -(2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cyclopropane-l-carbonitrile as brown oil.

Step 6

[00162] l-(2.2-difluoro-2H-1.3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cvclopropane-l-carboxylic acid: To a 250-mL round-bottom flask purged and maintained with an inert atmosphere of nitrogen, was placed l-(2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cyclopropane-l-carbonitrile (10.12 g, 45.38 mmol, 1.00 equiv), 6 N NaOH (61 mL) and EtOH (60 mL). The resulting solution was stirred for 3 h at 100 °C. The reaction mixture was cooled and the pH value of the solution was adjusted to 2 with hydrogen chloride (1 mol/L) until LCMS indicated the completion of the reaction. The solids were collected by filtration to afford 9.68 g (88%) of l-(2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cyclopropane-l-carboxylic acid as a light yellow solid.

Step 7

[00163] l-(2.2-difluoro-2H-1.3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cvclopropane-l-carbonyl chloride; To a solution of l-(2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cyclopropane-l-carboxylic acid (687 mg, 2.84 mmol, 1.00 equiv.) in toluene (5 mL) was added thionyl chloride (1.67 g, 5.00 equiv.). The resulting solution was stirred for 3h at 65 °C. The reaction mixture was cooled and concentrated under vacuum to afford 738 mg (99%) of l-(2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cyclopropane-l-carbonyl chloride as a yellow solid.

Step 8

9 STEP 8 10

2-methyl-4-(trimethylsilyl)but-3-vn-2-ol: To a solution of ethynyltrimethylsilane (20 g, 203.63 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in THF (100 mL) was added n-BuLi (81 mL, 2.5M in THF)

dropwise with stirring at -78 °C. Then the resulting mixture was warmed to 0 °C for 1 h with stirring and then cooled to -78 °C. Propan-2-one (11.6 g, 199.73 mmol, 1.00 equiv.) was added dropwise with the inert temperature below -78 °C. The resulting solution was stirred at -78 °C for 3 h. The reaction was then quenched by the addition of 100 mL of water and extracted with 3 x 100 mL of MTBE. The combined organic layers was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum to afford 28 g (90%) of 2-methyl-4-(trimethylsilyl)but-3-yn-2-ol as an off-white solid. ¾ NMR (400 MHz, CDCh) δ: 1.50 (s, 6H), 1.16-1.14 (m, 9H).

Step 9

step 9

10

(3-chloro-3-methylbut-l-vnvntrimethylsilane: To a lOOmL round-bottom flask, was placed 2-methyl-4-(trimethylsilyl) but-3-yn-2-ol (14 g, 89.57 mmol, 1.00 equiv.), cone. HC1 (60 mL, 6.00 equiv.). The resulting solution was stirred for 16 h at 0 °C. The resulting solution was extracted with 3 x 100 mL of hexane. The combined organic layers was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum to afford 8 g (51%) of (3-chloro-3-methylbut-l-yn-l-yl)trimethylsilane as light yellow oil. ¾ NMR (400 MHz, CDCh) δ: 1.84 (s, 6H), 1.18-1.16 (m, 9H).

Step 10

step 10

11 12

(4-(benzyloxy)-3.3-dimethylbut-l-vnyl)trimethylsilane: Magnesium turnings (1.32 g, 1.20 equiv) were charged to a 250-mL 3-necked round-bottom flask and then suspended in THF (50 mL). The resulting mixture was cooled to 0 °C and maintained with an inert atmosphere of nitrogen. (3-chloro-3-methylbut-l-yn-l-yl)trimethylsilane (8 g, 45.78 mmol, 1.00 equiv.) was dissolved in THF (50 mL) and then added dropwise to this mixture with the inert temperature between 33-37 °C. The resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for an addition 1 h before BnOCH2Cl (6.45 g, 41.33 mmol, 0.90 equiv.) was added dropwise with the temperature below 10 °C. Then the resulting solution was stirred for 16 h at room temperature. The reaction was then quenched by the addition of 50 mL of water and extracted with 3 x 100 mL of hexane. The combined organic layers was dried over

anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum to afford 10 g (84%) of [4-(benzyloxy)-3,3-dimethylbut-l-yn-l-yl]trimethylsilane as light yellow oil. ¾ NMR (400 MHz, CDCh) δ: 7.37-7.35 (m, 5H), 4.62 (s, 2H), 3.34 (s, 2H), 1.24 (s, 6H), 0.17-0.14 (m, 9H).

Step 11

((2.2-dimethylbut-3-vnyloxy)methyl)benzene: To a solution of [4-(benzyloxy)-3,3-dimethylbut-l-yn-l-yl]trimethylsilane (10 g, 38.40 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in methanol (100 mL) was added potassium hydroxide (2.53 g, 38.33 mmol, 1.30 equiv). The resulting solution was stirred for 16 h at room temperature. The resulting solution was diluted with 200 mL of water and extracted with 3 x 100 mL of hexane. The organic layers combined and washed with 1 x 100 mL of water and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum to afford 5 g (69%) of [[(2,2-dimethylbut-3-yn-l-yl)oxy]methyl]benzene as light yellow oil. ¾ NMR (300 MHz, D20) δ: 7.41-7.28 (m, 5H) , 4.62 (s, 2H), 3.34 (s, 2H), 2.14 (s, 1H), 1.32-1.23 (m, 9H).

Step 12

14 15

methyl 2.2-difluorobenzo[d1[1.31dioxole-5-carboxylate: To a solution of 3-fluoro-4-nitroaniline (6.5 g, 41.64 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in chloroform (25 mL) and AcOH (80 mL) was added Bn (6.58 g, 41.17 mmol, 1.00 equiv.) dropwise with stirring at 0 °C in 20 min. The resulting solution was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. The reaction was then quenched by the addition of 150 mL of water/ice. The pH value of the solution was adjusted to 9 with sodium hydroxide (10 %). The resulting solution was extracted with 3 x 50 mL of ethyl acetate and the organic layers combined. The resulting mixture was washed with 1 x 50 mL of water and 2 x 50 mL of brine, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was re-crystallized from PE/EA (10: 1) to afford 6 g (61%) of 2-bromo-5-fluoro-4-nitroaniline as a yellow solid.

Step 13

(R)-l-(benzyloxy)-3-(2-bromo-5-fluoro-4-nitrophenylamino)propan-2-ol: 2-bromo-5-fluoro-4-nitroaniline (6.00 g, 25.56 mmol, 1.00 equiv.), Zn(C104)2 (1.90 g, 5.1 mmol, 0.20 equiv.), 4A Molecular Sieves (3 g), toluene (60 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 2 h and maintain with an inert atmosphere of N2 until (2R)-2-[(benzyloxy)methyl]oxirane (1.37 g, 8.34 mmol, 2.00 equiv.) was added. Then the resulting mixture was stirred for 15 h at 85 °C. The reaction progress was monitored by LCMS. The solids were filtered out and the resulting solution was diluted with 20 mL of ethyl acetate. The resulting mixture was washed with 2 x 20 mL of Sat. NH4CI and 1 x 20 mL of brine. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. The residue was purified by a silica gel column, eluted with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (1 :5) to afford 7.5 g (70%) of N-[(2R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2-hydroxypropyl]-2-bromo-5-fluoro-4-nitroaniline as a yellow solid.

Step 14

[00170] (R)-l-(4-amino-2-bromo-5-fluorophenylamino)-3-(benzyloxy)propan-2-ol: To a 250-mL round-bottom flask, was placed N-[(2R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2-hydroxypropyl]-2-bromo-5-fluoro-4-nitroaniline (7.5 g, 18.84 mmol, 1.00 equiv.), ethanol (80 mL), water (16 mL), NH4CI (10 g, 189 mmol, 10.00 equiv.), Zn (6.11 g, 18.84 mmol, 5.00 equiv.). The resulting solution was stirred for 4 h at 85 °C. The solids were filtered out and the resulting solution was concentrated under vacuum and diluted with 200 mL of ethyl acetate. The resulting mixture was washed with 1 x 50 mL of water and 2 x 50 mL of brine. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. The residue was purified by a silica gel column, eluted with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (1 :3) to afford 4.16 g (60%) of l-N-[(2R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2-hydroxypropyl]-2-bromo-5-fluorobenzene-l ,4-diamine as light yellow oil.

Step 15

TsO

(R)-4-(3-(benzyloxy)-2-hvdroxypropylamino)-5-bromo-2-fluorobenzenaminium 4-methylbenzenesulfonate: l-N-[(2R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2-hydroxypropyl]-2-bromo-5-fluorobenzene-l ,4-diamine (2 g, 5.42 mmol, 1.00 equiv.) was dissolved in dichloromethane (40 mL) followed by the addition of TsOH (1 g, 5.81 mmol, 1.10 equiv.). The resulting mixture was stirred for 16 h at room temperature and then concentrated under vacuum to afford 2.8 g (95%) of 4-[[(2R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2-hydroxypropyl]amino]-5-bromo-2-fluoroanilinium 4-methylbenzene-l -sulfonate as an off-white solid.

Step 16

(R)-l-(4-amino-2-(4-(benzyloxy)-3.3-dimethylbut-l-vnyl)-5-fluorophenylamino)-3-(benzyloxy)propan-2-ol: To a 100-mL round-bottom flask purged and maintained with an inert atmosphere of nitrogen, was placed 4-[[(2R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2-hydroxypropyl]amino]-5-bromo-2-fluoroanilinium 4-methylbenzene-l -sulfonate (2.9 g, 5.36 mmol, 1.00 equiv.), [[(2,2-dimethylbut-3-yn-l-yl)oxy]methyl]benzene (1.2 g, 6.37 mmol, 1.20 equiv.), Pd(OAc)2 (48 mg, 0.21 mmol, 0.04 equiv.), dppb (138 mg, 0.32 mmol, 0.06 equiv.), potassium carbonate (2.2 g, 15.92 mmol, 3.00 equiv.) and MeCN (50 mL). The resulting solution was stirred for 16 h at 80 °C. The solids were filtered out and the resulting mixture was concentrated under vacuum until LCMS indicated the completion of the reaction. The residue was purified by a silica gel column, eluted with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (1 :4) to afford 2.2 g (86%) of l-N-[(2R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2-hydroxypropyl]-2-[4-(benzyloxy)-3,3-dimethylbut-l-yn-l-yl]-5-fluorobenzene-l ,4-diamine as a light brown solid.

Step 17

l-(2.2-difluoro-2H-1.3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cvclopropane-l-carboxylic acid: To a 40-mL vial purged and maintained with an inert atmosphere of nitrogen, was placed 1-N-[(2R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2-hydroxypropyl]-2-[4-(benzyloxy)-3,3-dimethylbut-l-yn-l-yl]-5-fluorobenzene-l,4-diamine (1 g, 2.1 mmol, 1.00 equiv.), MeCN (10 mL), Pd(MeCN)2Cl2 (82 mg, 0.32 mmol, 0.15 equiv.). The resulting solution was stirred for 12 h at 85 °C. The reaction progress was monitored by LCMS. The resulting mixture was concentrated under vacuum to afford 900 mg (crude) of (2R)-l-[5-amino-2-[l-(benzyloxy)-2-methylpropan-2-yl]-6-fluoro-lH-indol-l-yl]-3-(benzyloxy)propan-2-ol as a brown solid, which was used for next step without further purification.

Step 18

(R)-N-(l-(3-(benzyloxy)-2-hvdroxypropyl)-2-(l-(benzyloxy)-2-methylpropan-2-yl)-6-fluoro- lH-indol-5-yl)- 1 -(2.2-difluorobenzo[dl [ 1.31 dioxol-5-vDcvclopropanecarboxamide: To a 40 mL vial purged and maintained with an inert atmosphere of nitrogen, was placed (2R)-l-[5-amino-2-[l-(benzyloxy)-2-methylpropan-2-yl]-6-fluoro-lH-indol-l-yl]-3-(benzyloxy)propan-2-ol (800 mg, 1.68 mmol, 1.00 equiv.), dichloromethane (20 mL), TEA (508 mg, 5.04 mmol, 3.00 equiv.). l-(2,2-difiuoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cyclopropane-l-carbonyl chloride (524 mg, 2 mmol, 1.20 equiv.) was added to this mixture at 0 °C. The resulting solution was stirred for 2 h at 25 °C. The reaction progress was monitored by LCMS. The resulting solution was diluted with 20 mL of DCM and washed with 3 xlO mL of brine. The combined organic layers was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. The residue was purified by a silica gel column, eluted with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (1:5) to afford 400 mg (30%) of N-[l-[(2R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2-hydroxypropyl]-2-[l-(benzyloxy)-2-methylpropan-2-yl]-6-fluoro-lH-indol-5-yl]-l-(2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cyclopropane-l-carboxamide as a light yellow solid.

Step 19

(R)-l-(2,2-difluorobenzo[d] [l,3]dioxol-5-yl)-N-(l-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-6-fluoro-2-(l-hydroxy-2-methylpropan-2-yl)-lH-indol-5-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide: To a 100-mL 3-necked round-bottom flask purged and maintained with an inert atmosphere of H2, were placed N-[l-[(2R)-3-(benzyloxy)-2-hydroxypropyl]-2-[l-(benzyloxy)-2-methylpropan-2-yl]-6-fluoro-lH-indol-5-yl]-l-(2,2-difluoro-2H-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)cyclopropane-l-carboxamide (400 mg, 0.77 mmol, 1.00 equiv.) dry Pd/C (300 mg) and MeOH (5 Ml, 6M HC1). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h until LCMS indicated the completion of the reaction. The solids were filtered out and the resulting mixture was concentrated under vacuum. The residue was purified by prep-HPLC with the following conditions: Column, XBridge Prep C18 OBD Column 19 x 150 mm, 5um; mobile phase and Gradient, Phase A: Waters (0.1%FA ), Phase B: ACN; Detector, UV 254 nm to afford 126.1 mg (42.4%) of (R)-l-(2,2-difluorobenzo[d] [l,3]dioxol-5-yl)-N-(l-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-6-fluoro-2-(l-hydroxy-2-methylpropan-2-yl)-lH-indol-5-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide as a light yellow solid.

¾ NMR (400 MHz, OMSO-de) δ: 8.32 (s, 1H), 7.54 (s, 1H), 7.41-7.38 (m, 2H), 7.34-7.31 (m, 2H), 6.22 (s, 1H), 5.03-5.02 (m, 1H), 4.93-4.90 (m, 1H), 4.77-4.75 (m, 1H), 4.42-4.39 (m, 1H), 4.14-4.08 (m, 1H), 3.91 (brs, 1H) , 3.64-3.57 (m, 2H), 3.47-3.40 (m, 2H), 1.48-1.46 (m, 2H), 1.36-1.32 (m, 6H), 1.14-1.12 (m, 2H).

LCMS: m/z = 521.2[M+H]+.

PATENT

WO 2015160787

https://www.google.com/patents/WO2015160787A1?cl=en

PATENT

WO 2014014841

https://www.google.com/patents/WO2014014841A1?cl=en

All tautomeric forms of the Compound 1 are included herein. For example, Compound 1 may exist as tautomers, both of which are included herein:

Figure imgf000026_0001

Methods of Preparing Compound 1 Amorphous Form and Compound 1 Form A

Compound 1 is the starting point and in one embodiment can be prepared by coupling an acid chloride moiety with an amine moiety according to Schemes 1-4.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of the acid chloride moiety.

Figure imgf000037_0001

Toluene, H20, 70 °C

Figure imgf000037_0002

Bu4NBr

1. NaOH

2. HC1

Figure imgf000037_0003

Scheme 2. Synthesis of acid chloride moiety – alternative synthesis.

Figure imgf000038_0001

1. NaCN

2. H20

Figure imgf000038_0002

SOC1,

Figure imgf000038_0003

Scheme 3. Synthesis of the amine moiety.

Figure imgf000039_0001
Figure imgf000039_0002
Figure imgf000039_0003

Scheme 4. Formation of Compound 1.

Figure imgf000040_0001

Compound 1

Methods of Preparing Compound 1 Amorphous Form

Starting from Compound 1 , or even a crystalline form of Compound 1 , Compound 1 Amorphous Form may be prepared by rotary evaporation or by spray dry methods.

Dissolving Compound 1 in an appropriate solvent like methanol and rotary evaporating the methanol to leave a foam produces Compound 1 Amorphous Form. In some embodiments, a warm water bath is used to expedite the evaporation.

Compound 1 Amorphous Form may also be prepared from Compound 1 using spray dry methods. Spray drying is a process that converts a liquid feed to a dried particulate form. Optionally, a secondary drying process such as fluidized bed drying or vacuum drying, may be used to reduce residual solvents to pharmaceutically acceptable levels. Typically, spray drying involves contacting a highly dispersed liquid suspension or solution, and a sufficient volume of hot air to produce evaporation and drying of the liquid droplets. The preparation to be spray dried can be any solution, coarse suspension, slurry, colloidal dispersion, or paste that may be atomized using the selected spray drying apparatus. In a standard procedure, the preparation is sprayed into a current of warm filtered air that evaporates the solvent and conveys the dried product to a collector (e.g. a cyclone). The spent air is then exhausted with the solvent, or alternatively the spent air is sent to a condenser to capture and potentially recycle the solvent. Commercially available types of apparatus may be used to conduct the spray drying. For example, commercial spray dryers are manufactured by Buchi Ltd. And Niro (e.g., the PSD line of spray driers manufactured by Niro) (see, US 2004/0105820; US 2003/0144257).

Spray drying typically employs solid loads of material from about 3% to about 30% by weight, (i.e., drug and excipients), for example about 4% to about 20% by weight, preferably at least about 10%. In general, the upper limit of solid loads is governed by the viscosity of (e.g., the ability to pump) the resulting solution and the solubility of the components in the solution. Generally, the viscosity of the solution can determine the size of the particle in the resulting powder product.

Techniques and methods for spray drying may be found in Perry’s Chemical

Engineering Handbook, 6th Ed., R. H. Perry, D. W. Green & J. O. Maloney, eds.), McGraw-Hill book co. (1984); and Marshall “Atomization and Spray-Drying” 50, Chem. Eng. Prog. Monogr. Series 2 (1954). In general, the spray drying is conducted with an inlet temperature of from about 60 °C to about 200 °C, for example, from about 95 °C to about 185 °C, from about 110 °C to about 182 °C, from about 96 °C to about 180 °C, e.g., about 145 °C. The spray drying is generally conducted with an outlet temperature of from about 30 °C to about 90 °C, for example from about 40 °C to about 80 °C, about 45 °C to about 80 °C e.g., about 75 °C. The atomization flow rate is generally from about 4 kg h to about 12 kg/h, for example, from about 4.3 kg/h to about 10.5 kg h, e.g., about 6 kg/h or about 10.5 kg/h. The feed flow rate is generally from about 3 kg/h to about 10 kg/h, for example, from about 3.5 kg/h to about 9.0 kg/h, e.g., about 8 kg/h or about 7.1 kg/h. The atomization ratio is generally from about 0.3 to 1.7, e.g., from about 0.5 to 1.5, e.g., about 0.8 or about 1.5.

Removal of the solvent may require a subsequent drying step, such as tray drying, fluid bed drying (e.g., from about room temperature to about 100 °C), vacuum drying, microwave drying, rotary drum drying or biconical vacuum drying (e.g., from about room temperature to about 200 °C).

Synthesis of Compound 1

Acid Chloride Moiety

Synthesis of (2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-l-ethylacetate-acetonitrile

Figure imgf000083_0001

ouene, 2 , CN

A reactor was purged with nitrogen and charged with 900 mL of toluene. The solvent was degassed via nitrogen sparge for no less than 16 h. To the reactor was then charged Na3P04 (155.7 g, 949.5 mmol), followed by bis(dibenzylideneacetone) palladium (0) (7.28 g, 12.66 mmol). A 10% w/w solution of tert-butylphosphine in hexanes (51.23 g, 25.32 mmol) was charged over 10 min at 23 °C from a nitrogen purged addition funnel. The mixture was allowed to stir for 50 min, at which time 5-bromo-2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxole (75 g, 316.5 mmol) was added over 1 min. After stirring for an additional 50 min, the mixture was charged with ethyl cyanoacetate (71.6 g, 633.0 mmol) over 5 min followed by water (4.5 mL) in one portion. The mixture was heated to 70 °C over 40 min and analyzed by HPLC every 1 – 2 h for the percent conversion of the reactant to the product. After complete conversion was observed (typically 100% conversion after 5 – 8 h), the mixture was cooled to 20 – 25 °C and filtered through a celite pad. The celite pad was rinsed with toluene (2 X 450 mL) and the combined organics were concentrated to 300 mL under vacuum at 60 – 65 °C. The concentrate was charged with 225mL DMSO and concentrated under vacuum at 70 – 80 °C until active distillation of the solvent ceased. The solution was cooled to 20 – 25 °C and diluted to 900 mL with DMSO in preparation for Step 2. Ή NMR (500 MHz, CDC13) δ 7.16 – 7.10 (m, 2H), 7.03 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 4.63 (s, 1H), 4.19 (m, 2H), 1.23 (t, J= 7.1 Hz, 3H).

Synthesis of (2,2-difluoro-l^-benzodioxol-5-yl)-acetonitrile.

Figure imgf000084_0001

[00311] The DMSO solution of (2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-l-ethylacetate-acetonitrile from above was charged with 3 N HCl (617.3 mL, 1.85 mol) over 20 min while maintaining an internal temperature < 40 °C. The mixture was then heated to 75°C over 1 h and analyzed by HPLC every 1 – 2 h for % conversion. When a conversion of > 99% was observed (typically after 5 – 6 h), the reaction was cooled to 20 – 25 °C and extracted with MTBE (2 X 525 mL), with sufficient time to allow for complete phase separation during the extractions. The combined organic extracts were washed with 5% NaCl (2 X 375 mL). The solution was then transferred to equipment appropriate for a 1.5 – 2.5 Torr vacuum distillation that was equipped with a cooled receiver flask. The solution was concentrated under vacuum at < 60°C to remove the solvents. (2,2-Difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-acetonitrile was then distilled from the resulting oil at 125 – 130 °C (oven temperature) and 1.5 – 2.0 Torr. (2,2-Difluoro-l,3- benzodioxol-5-yl)-acetonitrile was isolated as a clear oil in 66% yield from 5-bromo-2,2- difluoro-l,3-benzodioxole (2 steps) and with an HPLC purity of 91.5% AUC (corresponds to a w/w assay of 95%). Ή NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) 6 7.44 (br s, 1H), 7.43 (d, J= 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (dd, J= 8.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.07 (s, 2H).  Synthesis of (2,2-difluoro- l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-cycIopropanecarbonitrUe.

Figure imgf000085_0001

MTBE

A stock solution of 50% w/w NaOH was degassed via nitrogen sparge for no less than 16 h. An appropriate amount of MTBE was similarly degassed for several hours. To a reactor purged with nitrogen was charged degassed MTBE (143 mL) followed by (2,2-difluoro-l,3- benzodioxol-5-yl)-acetonitrile (40.95 g, 207.7 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium bromide (2.25 g, 10.38 mmol). The volume of the mixture was noted and the mixture was degassed via nitrogen sparge for 30 min. Enough degassed MTBE is charged to return the mixture to the original volume prior to degassing. To the stirring mixture at 23.0 °C was charged degassed 50% w/w NaOH (143 mL) over 10 min followed by l-bromo-2-chloroethane (44.7 g, 311.6 mmol) over 30 min. The reaction was analyzed by HPLC in 1 h intervals for % conversion. Before sampling, stirring was stopped and the phases allowed to separate. The top organic phase was sampled for analysis. When a % conversion > 99 % was observed (typically after 2.5 – 3 h), the reaction mixture was cooled to 10 °C and was charged with water (461 mL) at such a rate as to maintain a temperature < 25 °C. The temperature was adjusted to 20 – 25 °C and the phases separated. Note: sufficient time should be allowed for complete phase separation. The aqueous phase was extracted with MTBE (123 mL), and the combined organic phase was washed with 1 N HC1 (163mL) and 5% NaCl (163 mL). The solution of (2,2-difluoro- 1,3 -benzodioxol-5-yl)- cyclopropanecarbonitrile in MTBE was concentrated to 164 mL under vacuum at 40 – 50 °C. The solution was charged with ethanol (256 mL) and again concentrated to 164 mL under vacuum at 50 – 60 °C. Ethanol (256 mL) was charged and the mixture concentrated to 164 mL under vacuum at 50 – 60 °C. The resulting mixture was cooled to 20 – 25 °C and diluted with ethanol to 266 mL in preparation for the next step. lH NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) 6 7.43 (d, J= 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J= 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (dd, J= 8.4, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 1.75 (m, 2H), 1.53 (m, 2H). [00314] Synthesis of l-(2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-cyclopropanecarboxylic acid.

Figure imgf000086_0001

The solution of (2,2-difluoro-l ,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-cyclopropanecarbonitrile in ethanol from the previous step was charged with 6 N NaOH (277 mL) over 20 min and heated to an internal temperature of 77 – 78 °C over 45 min. The reaction progress was monitored by HPLC after 16 h. Note: the consumption of both (2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)- cyclopropanecarbonitrile and the primary amide resulting from partial hydrolysis of (2,2-difluoro- l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-cyclopropanecarbonitrile were monitored. When a % conversion > 99 % was observed (typically 100% conversion after 16 h), the reaction mixture was cooled to 25 °C and charged with ethanol (41 mL) and DCM (164 mL). The solution was cooled to 10 °C and charged with 6 N HC1 (290 mL) at such a rate as to maintain a temperature < 25 °C. After warming to 20 – 25 °C, the phases were allowed to separate. The bottom organic phase was collected and the top aqueous phase was back extracted with DCM (164 mL). Note: the aqueous phase was somewhat cloudy before and after the extraction due to a high concentration of inorganic salts. The organics were combined and concentrated under vacuum to 164 mL. Toluene (328 mL) was charged and the mixture condensed to 164 mL at 70 – 75 °C. The mixture was cooled to 45 °C, charged with MTBE (364 mL) and stirred at 60 °C for 20 min. The solution was cooled to 25 °C and polish filtered to remove residual inorganic salts. MTBE (123 mL) was used to rinse the reactor and the collected solids. The combined organics were transferred to a clean reactor in preparation for the next step.

Isolation of l-(2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-cyclopropanecar boxy lie acid.

Figure imgf000086_0002

The solution of l-(2,2-difluoro- 1 ,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-cyclopropanecarboxylic acid from the previous step is concentrated under vacuum to 164 mL, charged with toluene (328 mL) and concentrated to 164 mL at 70 – 75 °C. The mixture was then heated to 100 – 105 °C to give a homogeneous solution. After stirring at that temperature for 30 min, the solution was cooled to 5 °C over 2 hours and maintained at 5 °C for 3 hours. The mixture was then filtered and the reactor and collected solid washed with cold 1 :1 toluene/n-heptane (2 X 123 mL). The material was dried under vacuum at 55 °C for 17 hours to provide l-(2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)- cyclopropanecarboxylic acid as an off-white crystalline solid. l-(2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol- 5-yl)-cyclopropanecarboxylic acid was isolated in 79% yield from (2,2-difluoro-l,3- benzodioxol-5-yl)-acetonitrile (3 steps including isolation) and with an HPLC purity of 99.0% AUC. ESI-MS m/z calc. 242.04, found 241.58 (M+l)+; Ή NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 12.40 (s, 1H), 7.40 (d, J= 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J= 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (dd, J= 8.3, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 1.46 (m, 2H), 1.17 (m, 2H).

Alternative Synthesis of the Acid Chloride Moiety [00319] Synthesis of (2,2-ditluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-methanol.

1. Vitride (2 equiv)

PhCH3 (10 vol)

Figure imgf000087_0001

[00320] Commercially available 2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxole-5-carboxylic acid (1.0 eq) is slurried in toluene (10 vol). Vitride® (2 eq) is added via addition funnel at a rate to maintain the temperature at 15-25 °C. At the end of addition the temperature is increased to 40 °C for 2 h then 10% (w/w) aq. NaOH (4.0 eq) is carefully added via addition funnel maintaining the temperature at 40-50 °C. After stirring for an additional 30 minutes, the layers are allowed to separate at 40 °C. The organic phase is cooled to 20 °C then washed with water (2 x 1.5 vol), dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated to afford crude (2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-methanol that is used directly in the next step.

Synthesis of 5-chloromethyl-2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxole.

1. SOCl2 (1.5 equiv)

DMAP (0.01 equiv)

Figure imgf000087_0002

(2,2-difluoro- 1 ,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-methanol ( 1.0 eq) is dissolved in MTBE (5 vol). A catalytic amount of DMAP (1 mol %) is added and S0C12 (1.2 eq) is added via addition funnel. The S0C12 is added at a rate to maintain the temperature in the reactor at 15-25 °C. The temperature is increased to 30 °C for 1 hour then cooled to 20 °C then water (4 vol) is added via addition funnel maintaining the temperature at less than 30 °C. After stirring for an additional 30 minutes, the layers are allowed to separate. The organic layer is stirred and 10% (w/v) aq. NaOH (4.4 vol) is added. After stirring for 15 to 20 minutes, the layers are allowed to separate. The organic phase is then dried (Na2SO_ , filtered, and concentrated to afford crude 5-chloromethyl- 2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxole that is used directly in the next step.

Synthesis of (2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-acetonitrile.

Figure imgf000088_0001

A solution of 5-chloromethyl-2,2-difluoro- 1 ,3-benzodioxole ( 1 eq) in DMSO ( 1.25 vol) is added to a slurry of NaCN (1.4 eq) in DMSO (3 vol) maintaining the temperature between 30-40 °C. The mixture is stirred for 1 hour then water (6 vol) is added followed by MTBE (4 vol). After stirring for 30 min, the layers are separated. The aqueous layer is extracted with MTBE (1.8 vol). The combined organic layers are washed with water (1,8 vol), dried (Na2S04), filtered, and concentrated to afford crude (2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-acetonitrile (95%) that is used directly in the next step.

The remaining steps are the same as described above for the synthesis of the acid moiety.

Amine Moiety

Synthesis of 2-bromo-5-fluoro-4-ntroaniline.

Figure imgf000088_0002
A flask was charged with 3-fluoro-4-nitroaniline (1.0 equiv) followed by ethyl acetate (10 vol) and stirred to dissolve all solids. N-Bromosuccinimide (1.0 equiv) was added as a portion-wise as to maintain internal temperature of 22 °C. At the end of the reaction, the reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo on a rotavap. The residue was slurried in distilled water (5 vol) to dissolve and remove succinimide. (The succinimide can also be removed by water workup procedure.) The water was decanted and the solid was slurried in 2-propanol (5 vol) overnight. The resulting slurry was filtered and the wetcake was washed with 2-propanol, dried in vacuum oven at 50 °C overnight with N2 bleed until constant weight was achieved. A yellowish tan solid was isolated (50% yield, 97.5% AUC). Other impurities were a bromo-regioisomer (1.4% AUC) and a di- bromo adduct (1.1% AUC). Ή NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.19 (1 H, d, J= 8.1 Hz), 7.06 (br. s, 2 H), 6.64 (d, 1 H, J= 14.3 Hz).

Synthesis of benzyIglycoIated-4-ammonium-2-bromo-5-fluoroaniline tosylate salt.

1) l ^OBn

cat. Zn(C104)2-2H20 ®

Figure imgf000089_0001

DCM

A thoroughly dried flask under N2 was charged with the following: Activated powdered 4A molecular sieves (50 wt% based on 2-bromo-5-fluoro-4-nitroaniline), 2-Bromo-5- fluoro-4-nitroaniline (1.0 equiv), zinc perchlorate dihydrate (20 mol%), and toluene (8 vol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for NMT 30 min. Lastly, (R)-benzyl glycidyl ether (2.0 equiv) in toluene (2 vol) was added in a steady stream. The reaction was heated to 80 °C (internal temperature) and stirred for approximately 7 hours or until 2-Bromo-5-fluoro-4-nitroaniline was <5%AUC.

The reaction was cooled to room temperature and Celite (50 wt%) was added, followed by ethyl acetate (10 vol). The resulting mixture was filtered to remove Celite and sieves and washed with ethyl acetate (2 vol). The filtrate was washed with ammonium chloride solution (4 vol, 20% w/v). The organic layer was washed with sodium bicarbonate solution (4 vol x 2.5% w/v). The organic layer was concentrated in vacuo on a rotovap. The resulting slurry was dissolved in isopropyl acetate (10 vol) and this solution was transferred to a Buchi hydrogenator.

The hydrogenator was charged with 5wt% Pt(S)/C (1.5 mol%) and the mixture was stirred under N2 at 30 °C (internal temperature). The reaction was flushed with N2 followed by hydrogen. The hydrogenator pressure was adjusted to 1 Bar of hydrogen and the mixture was stirred rapidly (>1200 rpm). At the end of the reaction, the catalyst was filtered through a pad of Celite and washed with dichloromethane (10 vol). The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. Any remaining isopropyl acetate was chased with dichloromethane (2 vol) and concentrated on a rotavap to dryness.

The resulting residue was dissolved in dichloromethane (10 vol). jP-Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (1.2 equiv) was added and stirred overnight. The product was filtered and washed with dichloromethane (2 vol) and suction dried. The wetcake was transferred to drying trays and into a vacuum oven and dried at 45 °C with N2 bleed until constant weight was achieved. Benzylglycolated-4-ammonium-2-bromo-5-fluoroaniline tosylate salt was isolated as an off-white solid.

Chiral purity was determined to be >97%ee.

[00334] Synthesis of (3-Chloro-3-methylbut-l-ynyl)trimethylsilane.

Figure imgf000090_0001

[00335] Propargyl alcohol (1.0 equiv) was charged to a vessel. Aqueous hydrochloric acid (37%, 3.75 vol) was added and stirring begun. During dissolution of the solid alcohol, a modest endotherm (5-6 °C) is observed. The resulting mixture was stirred overnight (16 h), slowly becoming dark red. A 30 L jacketed vessel is charged with water (5 vol) which is then cooled to 10 °C. The reaction mixture is transferred slowly into the water by vacuum, maintaining the internal temperature of the mixture below 25 °C. Hexanes (3 vol) is added and the resulting mixture is stirred for 0.5 h. The phases were settled and the aqueous phase (pH < 1) was drained off and discarded. The organic phase was concentrated in vacuo using a rotary evaporator, furnishing the product as red oil. [00336] Synthesis of (4-(Benzyloxy)-3,3-dimethylbut-l-yttyl)trimethylsiIane.

Figure imgf000091_0001

[00337] Method A

[00338] All equivalent and volume descriptors in this part are based on a 250g reaction.

Magnesium turnings (69.5 g, 2.86 mol, 2.0 equiv) were charged to a 3 L 4-neck reactor and stirred with a magnetic stirrer under nitrogen for 0.5 h. The reactor was immersed in an ice- water bath. A solution of the propargyl chloride (250 g, 1.43 mol, 1.0 equiv) in THF (1.8 L, 7.2 vol) was added slowly to the reactor, with stirring, until an initial exotherm (-10 °C) was observed. The Grignard reagent formation was confirmed by IPC usingΉ-NMR spectroscopy. Once the exotherm subsided, the remainder of the solution was added slowly, maintaining the batch temperature <15 °C. The addition required ~3.5 h. The resulting dark green mixture was decanted into a 2 L capped bottle.

[00339] All equivalent and volume descriptors in this part are based on a 500g reaction. A 22 L reactor was charged with a solution of benzyl chloromethyl ether (95%, 375 g, 2.31 mol, 0.8 equiv) in THF (1.5 L, 3 vol). The reactor was cooled in an ice-water bath. Two Grignard reagent batches prepared as described above were combined and then added slowly to the benzyl chloromethyl ether solution via an addition funnel, maintaining the batch temperature below 25 °C. The addition required 1.5 h. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight (16 h).

[00340] All equivalent and volume descriptors in this part are based on a 1 kg reaction. A solution of 15%» ammonium chloride was prepared in a 30 L jacketed reactor (1.5 kg in 8.5 kg of water, 10 vol). The solution was cooled to 5 °C. Two Grignard reaction mixtures prepared as described above were combined and then transferred into the ammonium chloride solution via a header vessel. An exotherm was observed in this quench, which was carried out at a rate such as to keep the internal temperature below 25 °C. Once the transfer was complete, the vessel jacket temperature was set to 25 °C. Hexanes (8 L, 8 vol) was added and the mixture was stirred for 0.5 h. After settling the phases, the aqueous phase (pH 9) was drained off and discarded. The remaining organic phase was washed with water (2 L, 2 vol). The organic phase was concentrated in vacuo using a 22 L rotary evaporator, providing the crude product as an orange oil.

[00341] Method B

[00342] Magnesium turnings (106 g, 4.35 mol, 1.0 eq) were charged to a 22 L reactor and then suspended in THF (760 mL, 1 vol). The vessel was cooled in an ice-water bath such that the batch temperature reached 2 °C. A solution of the propargyl chloride (760 g, 4.35 mol, 1.0 equiv) in THF (4.5 L, 6 vol) was added slowly to the reactor. After 100 mL was added, the addition was stopped and the mixture stirred until a 13 °C exotherm was observed, indicating the Grignard reagent initiation. Once the exotherm subsided, another 500 mL of the propargyl chloride solution was added slowly, maintaining the batch temperature <20 °C. The Grignard reagent formation was confirmed by IPC using Ή-NMR spectroscopy. The remainder of the propargyl chloride solution was added slowly, maintaining the batch temperature <20 °C. The addition required -1.5 h. The resulting dark green solution was stirred for 0.5 h. The Grignard reagent formation was confirmed by IPC using Ή-NMR spectroscopy. Neat benzyl

chloromethyl ether was charged to the reactor addition funnel and then added dropwise into the reactor, maintaining the batch temperature below 25 °C. The addition required 1.0 h. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight. The aqueous work-up and concentration was carried out using the same procedure and relative amounts of materials as in Method A to give the product as an orange oil.

[00343] Syntheisis of 4-Benzyloxy-3,3-dimethylbut-l-yne.

Figure imgf000092_0001

2 steps

[00344] A 30 L jacketed reactor was charged with methanol (6 vol) which was then cooled to 5 °C. Potassium hydroxide (85%, 1.3 equiv) was added to the reactor. A 15-20 °C exotherm was observed as the potassium hydroxide dissolved. The jacket temperature was set to 25 °C. A solution of 4-benzyloxy-3,3-dimethyl-l-trimethylsilylbut-l-yne (1.0 equiv) in methanol (2 vol) was added and the resulting mixture was stirred until reaction completion, as monitored by HPLC. Typical reaction time at 25 °C is 3-4 h. The reaction mixture is diluted with water (8 vol) and then stirred for 0.5 h. Hexanes (6 vol) was added and the resulting mixture was stirred for 0.5 h. The phases were allowed to settle and then the aqueous phase (pH 10-11) was drained off and discarded. The organic phase was washed with a solution of KOH (85%, 0.4 equiv) in water (8 vol) followed by water (8 vol). The organic phase was then concentrated down using a rotary evaporator, yielding the title material as a yellow-orange oil. Typical purity of this material is in the 80% range with primarily a single impurity present. Ή NMR (400 MHz, C6D6) δ 7.28 (d, 2 H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.18 (t, 2 H, J= 7.2 Hz), 7.10 (d, 1H, J= 7.2 Hz), 4.35 (s, 2 H), 3.24 (s, 2 H), 1.91 (s, 1 H), 1.25 (s, 6 H).

[00345] Synthesis of N-benzylglycolated-5-amino-2-(2-benzyloxy-l,l-dimethylethyl)-6- fluoroindole.

[00346] Method A

[00347] Synthesis of Benzylglycolated 4-Amino-2-(4-benzyloxy-3,3-dimethyIbut- l-ynyl)-5- fluoroaniline.

Figure imgf000093_0001

[00348] Benzylglycolated 4-ammonium-2-bromo-5-flouroaniline tosylate salt was freebased by stirring the solid in EtOAc (5 vol) and saturated NaHCC>3 solution (5 vol) until clear organic layer was achieved. The resulting layers were separated and the organic layer was washed with saturated NaHC03 solution (5 vol) followed by brine and concentrated in vacuo to obtain benzylglocolated 4-ammonium-2-bromo-5-flouroaniline tosylate salt as an oil.

[00349] Then, a flask was charged with benzylglycolated 4-ammonium-2-bromo-5- flouroaniline tosylate salt (freebase, 1.0 equiv), Pd(OAc) (4.0 mol%), dppb (6.0 mol%) and powdered K2CO3 (3.0 equiv) and stirred with acetonitrile (6 vol) at room temperature. The resulting reaction mixture was degassed for approximately 30 min by bubbling in N2 with vent. Then 4-benzyloxy-3,3-dimethylbut-l-yne (1.1 equiv) dissolved in acetonitrile (2 vol) was added in a fast stream and heated to 80 °C and stirred until complete consumption of 4-ammonium-2- bromo-5-flouroaniline tosylate salt was achieved. The reaction slurry was cooled to room temperature and filtered through a pad of Celite and washed with acetonitrile (2 vol). Filtrate was concentrated in vacuo and the residue was redissolved in EtOAc (6 vol). The organic layer was washed twice with NH4CI solution (20% w/v, 4 vol) and brine (6 vol). The resulting organic layer was concentrated to yield brown oil and used as is in the next reaction.

[00350] Synthesis of N-benzylglycolated-5-amino-2-(2-benzyloxy-l,l-dimethylethyl)-6- fluoroindole.

Figure imgf000094_0001

[00351] Crude oil of benzylglycolated 4-amino-2-(4-benzyloxy-3,3-dimethylbut-l-ynyl)-5- fluoroaniline was dissolved in acetonitrile (6 vol) and added (MeCN)2PdCl2 (15 mol%) at room temperature. The resulting mixture was degassed using N2 with vent for approximately 30 min. Then the reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C under N2 blanket overnight. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered through a pad of Celite and washed the cake with acetonitrile (1 vol). The resulting filtrate was concentrated in vacuo and redissolved in EtOAc (5 vol). Deloxane-II THP (5 wt% based on the theoretical yield of N-benzylglycolated-5-amino-2- (2-benzyloxy-l,l-dimethylethyl)-6-fluoroindole) was added and stirred at room temperature overnight. The mixture was then filtered through a pad of silica (2.5 inch depth, 6 inch diameter filter) and washed with EtOAc (4 vol). The filtrate was concentrated down to a dark brown residue, and used as is in the next reaction.

[00352] Repurification of crude N-benzylglycolated-5-amino-2-(2-benzyloxy- 1,1- dimethylethyl)-6-fluoroindole:

[00353] The crude N-benzylglycolated-5-amino-2-(2-benzyloxy- 1 , l-dimethylethyl)-6- fluoroindole was dissolved in dichloromethane (~1.5 vol) and filtered through a pad of silica initially using 30% EtOAc/heptane where impurities were discarded. Then the silica pad was washed with 50% EtO Ac/heptane to isolate N-benzylglycolated-5-amino-2-(2-benzyloxy-l,l- dimethylethyl)-6-fluoroindole until faint color was observed in the filtrate. This filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to afford brown oil which crystallized on standing at room temperature. Ή NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) 6 7.38-7.34 (m, 4 H), 7.32-7.23 (m, 6 H), 7.21 (d, 1 H, J= 12.8 Hz), 6.77 (d, 1H, J= 9.0 Hz), 6.06 (s, 1 H), 5.13 (d, 1H, J = 4.9 Hz), 4.54 (s, 2 H), 4.46 (br. s, 2 H), 4.45 (s, 2 H), 4.33 (d, 1 H, J= 12.4 Hz), 4.09-4.04 (m, 2 H), 3.63 (d, 1H, J= 9.2 Hz), 3.56 (d, 1H, J= 9.2 Hz), 3.49 (dd, 1H, J= 9.8, 4.4 Hz), 3.43 (dd, 1H, J= 9.8, 5.7 Hz), 1.40 (s, 6 H).

[00354] Synthesis of N-benzyIglycolated-5-amino-2-(2-benzyIoxy-l,l-diniethylethyl)-6- fluoroindole.

[00355] Method B

Figure imgf000095_0001

2. (MeCN)2PdCl2

MeCN, 80 <€

3. Silica gel filtration

[00356] Palladium acetate (33 g, 0.04 eq), dppb (94 g, 0.06 eq), and potassium carbonate (1.5 kg, 3.0 eq) are charged to a reactor. The free based oil benzylglocolated 4-ammonium-2-bromo- 5-flouroaniline (1.5 kg, 1.0 eq) was dissolved in acetonitrile (8.2 L, 4.1 vol) and then added to the reactor. The mixture was sparged with nitrogen gas for NLT 1 h. A solution of 4-benzyloxy- 3,3-dimethylbut-l-yne (70%), 1.1 kg, 1.05 eq) in acetonitrile was added to the mixture which was then sparged with nitrogen gas for NLT 1 h. The mixture was heated to 80 °C and then stirred overnight. IPC by HPLC is carried out and the reaction is determined to be complete after 16 h. The mixture was cooled to ambient temperature and then filtered through a pad of Celite (228 g). The reactor and Celite pad were washed with acetonitrile (2 x 2 L, 2 vol). The combined phases are concentrated on a 22 L rotary evaporator until 8 L of solvent have been collected, leaving the crude product in 7 L (3.5 vol) of acetonitrile. [00357] 5 s-acetonitriledichloropalladium ( 144 g, 0.15 eq) was charged to the reactor. The crude solution was transferred back into the reactor and the roto-vap bulb was washed with acetonitrile (4 L, 2 vol). The combined solutions were sparged with nitrogen gas for NLT 1 h. The reaction mixture was heated to 80 °C for NLT 16 h. In process control by HPLC shows complete consumption of starting material. The reaction mixture was filtered through Celite (300 g). The reactor and filter cake were washed with acetonitrile (3 L, 1.5 vol). The combined filtrates were concentrated to an oil by rotary evaporation. The oil was dissolved in ethyl acetate (8.8 L, 4.4 vol). The solution was washed with 20% ammonium chloride (5 L, 2.5 vol) followed by 5% brine (5 L, 2.5 vol). Silica gel (3.5 kg, 1.8 wt. eq.) of silica gel was added to the organic phase, which was stirred overnight. Deloxan THP II metal scavenger (358 g) and heptane (17.6 L) were added and the resulting mixture was stirred for NLT 3 h. The mixture was filtered through a sintered glass funnel. The filter cake was washed with 30% ethyl acetate in heptane (25 L). The combined filtrates were concentrated under reduced pressure to give N- benzylglycolated-5-amino-2-(2-benzyloxy-l,l-dimethylethyl)-6-fluoroindole as a brown paste ( 1.4 kgl.Svnthesis of Compound 1

[00358] Synthesis of benzyl protected Compound 1.

Figure imgf000096_0001
Figure imgf000096_0002
Figure imgf000096_0003

[00359] 1 -(2,2-difluoro- 1 ,3 -benzodioxol-5-yl)-cyclopropanecarboxylic acid (1.3 equiv) was slurried in toluene (2.5 vol, based on l-(2,2-difluoro-l,3-benzodioxol-5-yi)- cyclopropanecarboxylic acid) and the mixture was heated to 60 °C. SOCl2 (1.7 equiv) was added via addition runnel. The resulting mixture was stirred for 2 hr. The toluene and the excess

SOCI2 were distilled off using rotavop. Additional toluene (2.5 vol, based on l-(2,2-difluoro- l,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-cyclopropanecarboxylic acid) was added and distilled again. The crude acid chloride was dissolved in dichloromethane (2 vol) and added via addition funnel to a mixture of N-benzylglycolated-5-amino-2-(2-benzyloxy-l,l-dimethylethyl)-6-fluoroindole (1.0 equiv), and triethylamine (2.0 equiv) in dichloromethane (7 vol) while maintaining 0-3 °C (internal temperature). The resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 4 hrs and then warmed to room temperature overnight. Distilled water (5 vol) was added to the reaction mixture and stirred for NLT 30 min and the layers were separated. The organic phase was washed with 20 wt% K2CO3 (4 vol x 2) followed by a brine wash (4 vol) and concentrated to afford crude benzyl protected Compound 1 as a thick brown oil, which was purified further using silica pad filtration.

[00360] Silica gel pad filtration: Crude benzyl protected Compound 1 was dissolved in ethyl acetate (3 vol) in the presence of activated carbon Darco-G (10wt%, based on theoretical yield of benzyl protected Compound 1) and stirred at room temperature overnight. To this mixture was added heptane (3 vol) and filtered through a pad of silica gel (2x weight of crude benzyl protected Compound 1). The silica pad was washed with ethyl acetate/heptane (1:1, 6 vol) or until little color was detected in the filtrate. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to afford benzyl protected Compound 1 as viscous reddish brown oil, and used directly in the next step.

[00361] Repurification: Benzyl protected Compound 1 was redissolved in dichloromethane (1 vol, based on theoretical yield of benzyl protected Compound 1) and loaded onto a silica gel pad (2x weight of crude benzyl protected Compound 1). The silica pad was washed with

dichloromethane (2 vol, based on theoretical yield of benzyl protected Compound 1) and the filtrate was discarded. The silica pad was washed with 30% ethyl acetate/heptane (5 vol) and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to afford benzyl protected Compound 1 as viscous reddish orange oil, and used directly in the next step. [00362] Synthesis of Compound 1.

Figure imgf000098_0001

OBn 4 steps

Figure imgf000098_0002

[00363] Method A

[00364] A 20 L autoclave was flushed three times with nitrogen gas and then charged with palladium on carbon (Evonik E 101 NN/W, 5% Pd, 60% wet, 200 g, 0.075 mol, 0.04 equiv). The autoclave was then flushed with nitrogen three times. A solution of crude benzyl protected Compound 1 (1.3 kg, ~ 1.9 mol) in THF (8 L, 6 vol) was added to the autoclave via suction. The vessel was capped and then flushed three times with nitrogen gas. With gentle stirring, the vessel was flushed three times with hydrogen gas, evacuating to atmosphere by diluting with nitrogen. The autoclave was pressurized to 3 Bar with hydrogen and the agitation rate was increased to 800 rpm. Rapid hydrogen uptake was observed (dissolution). Once uptake subsided, the vessel was heated to 50 °C.

[00365] For safety purposes, the thermostat was shut off at the end of every work-day. The vessel was pressurized to 4 Bar with hydrogen and then isolated from the hydrogen tank.

[00366] After 2 full days of reaction, more Pd / C (60 g, 0.023 mol, 0.01 equiv) was added to the mixture. This was done by flushing three times with nitrogen gas and then adding the catalyst through the solids addition port. Resuming the reaction was done as before. After 4 full days, the reaction was deemed complete by HPLC by the disappearance of not only the starting material but also of the peak corresponding to a mono-benzylated intermediate. [00367] The reaction mixture was filtered through a Celite pad. The vessel and filter cake were washed with THF (2 L, 1.5 vol). The Celite pad was then wetted with water and the cake discarded appropriately. The combined filtrate and THF wash were concentrated using a rotary evaporator yielding the crude product as a black oil, 1 kg.

[00368] The equivalents and volumes in the following purification are based on 1 kg of crude material. The crude black oil was dissolved in 1 :1 ethyl acetate-heptane. The mixture was charged to a pad of silica gel (1.5 kg, 1.5 wt. equiv) in a fritted funnel that had been saturated with 1 :1 ethyl acetate-heptane. The silica pad was flushed first with 1 :1 ethyl acetate-heptane (6 L, 6 vol) and then with pure ethyl acetate (14 L, 14 vol). The eluent was collected in 4 fractions which were analyzed by HPLC.

[00369] The equivalents and volumes in the following purification are based on 0.6 kg of crude material. Fraction 3 was concentrated by rotary evaporation to give a brown foam (600 g) and then redissolved in MTBE (1.8 L, 3 vol). The dark brown solution was stirred overnight at ambient temperature, during which time, crystallization occurred. Heptane (55 mL, 0.1 vol) was added and the mixture was stirred overnight. The mixture was filtered using a Buchner funnel and the filter cake was washed with 3:1 MTBE-heptane (900 mL, 1.5 vol). The filter cake was air-dried for 1 h and then vacuum dried at ambient temperature for 16 h, furnishing 253 g of Compound 1 as an off-white solid.

[00370] The equivalents and volumes for the following purification are based on 1.4 kg of crude material. Fractions 2 and 3 from the above silica gel filtration as well as material from a previous reaction were combined and concentrated to give 1.4 kg of a black oil. The mixture was resubmitted to the silica gel filtration (1.5 kg of silica gel, eluted with 3.5 L, 2.3 vol of 1 :1 ethyl acetate-heptane then 9 L, 6 vol of pure ethyl acetate) described above, which upon concentration gave a tan foamy solid (390 g).

[00371] The equivalents and volumes for the following purification are based on 390 g of crude material. The tan solid was insoluble in MTBE, so was dissolved in methanol (1.2 L, 3 vol). Using a 4 L Morton reactor equipped with a long-path distillation head, the mixture was distilled down to 2 vol. MTBE (1.2 L, 3 vol) was added and the mixture was distilled back down to 2 vol. A second portion of MTBE (1.6 L, 4 vol) was added and the mixture was distilled back down to 2 vol. A third portion of MTBE (1.2 L, 3 vol) was added and the mixture was distilled back down to 3 vol. Analysis of the distillate by GC revealed it to consist of -6% methanol. The thermostat was set to 48 °C (below the boiling temp of the MTBE-methanol azeotrope, which is 52 °C). The mixture was cooled to 20 °C over 2 h, during which time a relatively fast crystallization occurred. After stirring the mixture for 2 h, heptane (20 mL, 0.05 vol) was added and the mixture was stirred overnight (16 h). The mixture was filtered using a Buchner funnel and the filter cake was washed with 3:1 MTBE-heptane (800 mL, 2 vol). The filter cake was air- dried for 1 h and then vacuum dried at ambient temperature for 16 h, furnishing 130 g of Compound 1 as an off-white solid.

[00372] Method B

[00373] Benzyl protected Compound 1 was dissolved in THF (3 vol) and then stripped to dryness to remove any residual solvent. Benzyl protected Compound 1 was redissolved in THF (4 vol) and added to the hydrogenator containing 5 wt% Pd/C (2.5 mol%, 60% wet, Degussa E5 El 01 N /W). The internal temperature of the reaction was adjusted to 50 °C, and flushed with N2 (x5) followed by hydrogen (x3). The hydrogenator pressure was adjusted to 3 Bar of hydrogen and the mixture was stirred rapidly (>1100 rpm). At the end of the reaction, the catalyst was filtered through a pad of Celite and washed with THF (1 vol). The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to obtain a brown foamy residue. The resulting residue was dissolved in MTBE (5 vol) and 0.5N HC1 solution (2 vol) and distilled water (1 vol) were added. The mixture was stirred for NLT 30 min and the resulting layers were separated. The organic phase was washed with 10wt% K2CO3 solution (2 vol x2) followed by a brine wash. The organic layer was added to a flask containing silica gel (25 wt%), Deloxan-THP II (5wt%, 75% wet), and

Na2S04 and stirred overnight. The resulting mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite and washed with 10%THF/MTBE (3 vol). The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to afford crude Compound 1 as pale tan foam.

[00374] Compound 1 recovery from the mother liquor: Option A.

[00375] Silica gel pad filtration: The mother liquor was concentrated in vacuo to obtain a brown foam, dissolved in dichloromethane (2 vol), and filtered through a pad of silica (3x weight of the crude Compound 1). The silica pad was washed with ethyl acetate/heptane (1 :1, 13 vol) and the filtrate was discarded. The silica pad was washed with 10% THF/ethyl acetate (10 vol) and the filtrate was coiicentraied in vacuo to afford Compound 1 as pale tan foam. The above crystallization procedure was followed to isolate the remaining Compound 1.

{00376] Compound 1 recovery from the mother liquor: Option B,

[00377] Silica gel column chromatography: After chromatography on silica gel (50% ethyl acetate/hexaties to 100% ethyl acetate), the desired compound was isolated as pale tan foam. The above crystallization procedure was followed to isolate the remaining Compound 1.

{003781 Additional Recrystaliization of Compound 1

[ 0379j Solid Compound 1 (135 kg) was suspended in IPA (5.4 L, 4 vol) and then heated to 82 °C. Upon complete dissolution (visual), heptane (540 mL, 0.4 vol) was added slowly. The mixture was cooled to 58 °C The mixture was then cooled slowly to 51 °C, during which time crystallization occurs. The heat source was shut down and the recrystalfeation mixture was allowed to cool naturally overnight. The mixture was filtered using a benchtop Buclmer funnel and the filter cake was washed with IPA (2.7 L, 2 vol). The filler cake was dried in the tunnel under air flow for 8 h and then was oven-dried in vacuo at 45-50 °C overnight to give 1.02 kg of recrystallized Compound 1 ,

100380] Compound 1 may also be prepared by one of several synthetic routes disclosed in US published patent application U S20090131 92, incorporated herein by reference.

{003811 Table 6 below recites analytical data for Compound 1.

Table 6.

Figure imgf000101_0001

 Synthesis of Compound 1 Amorphous Form [00383] Spray-Dried Method

[00384] 9.95g of Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose acetate succinate HG grade (HPMCAS-HG) was weighed into a 500 ml beaker, along with 50 mg of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). MeOH (200 ml) was mixed with the solid. The material was allowed to stir for 4 h. To insure maximum dissolution, after 2 h of stirring the solution was sonicated for 5 mins, then allowed to continue stirring for the remaining 2 h. A very fin suspension of HPMCAS remained in solution. However, visual observation determined that no gummy portions remained on the walls of the vessel or stuck to the bottom after tilting the vessel.

[00385] Compound 1 (1 Og) was poured into the 500 ml beaker, and the system was allowed to continue stirring. The solution was spray dried using the following parameters:

Formulation Description: Compound 1 Form A/HPMCAS/SLS (50/49.5/0.5)

Buchi Mini Spray Dryer

T inlet (setpoint) 145 °C

T outlet (start) 75 °C

T outlet (end) 55 °C

Nitrogen Pressure 75 psi

Aspirator 100 %

Pump 35 %

Rotometer 40 mm

Filter Pressure 65 mbar

Condenser Temp -3 °C

Run Time l h

REFERENCES

1: Veit G, Avramescu RG, Perdomo D, Phuan PW, Bagdany M, Apaja PM, Borot F, Szollosi D, Wu YS, Finkbeiner WE, Hegedus T, Verkman AS, Lukacs GL. Some gating potentiators, including VX-770, diminish ΔF508-CFTR functional expression. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Jul 23;6(246):246ra97. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008889. PubMed PMID: 25101887.

2: Pettit RS, Fellner C. CFTR Modulators for the Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis. P T. 2014 Jul;39(7):500-11. PubMed PMID: 25083129; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4103577.

3: Norman P. Novel picolinamide-based cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator modulators: evaluation of WO2013038373, WO2013038376, WO2013038381, WO2013038386 and WO2013038390. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2014 Jul;24(7):829-37. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2014.876412. Epub 2014 Jan 7. PubMed PMID: 24392786.

//////TEZACAFTOR, VX 661, PHASE 3, 1152311-62-0, UNII: 8RW88Y506K,  deltaF508-CFTR corrector, Vertex,  treatment of cystic fibrosis in patients homozygous to the F508del-CFTR mutation

CC(C)(CO)C1=CC2=CC(=C(C=C2N1CC(CO)O)F)NC(=O)C3(CC3)C4=CC5=C(C=C4)OC(O5)(F)F

CC(C)(CO)c1cc2cc(c(cc2n1C[C@H](CO)O)F)NC(=O)C3(CC3)c4ccc5c(c4)OC(O5)(F)F

Share

Nickel-Catalyzed Decarbonylative Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling of Amides To Generate Biaryls

 PROCESS, spectroscopy, SYNTHESIS  Comments Off on Nickel-Catalyzed Decarbonylative Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling of Amides To Generate Biaryls
Jul 112016
 

Thumbnail image of graphical abstract

Shi et al. have reported a nickel-catalyzed decarbonylative Suzuki–Miyaura reaction which uses an N-aroylpiperidine-2,6-dione as the coupling partner for the boronic acid ( Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6959−6963).
The method is attractive from the point of view of the stability of N-aroylpyrrolidine-2,5-diones toward storage and manipulation and the flexibility they add to the chemist’s toolbox, given their preparation from a different group of precursors to aryl halides or triflates.
Notably, the reaction uses an air-stable and inexpensive nickel catalyst, and the reactions tolerate the presence of water. While a standard reaction temperature of 150 °C is quoted, the use of temperatures as low as 80 °C also seem to be possible. Coupling efficiency is reported to be adversely affected when the aromatic rings of both of the coupling partners bear electron-donating substituents.
Ortho substituents on the aromatic rings seem to be beneficial as they facilitate decarbonylation as part of the cross-coupling. Oxidative addition into the N–C(aroyl) bond of the amide is proposed as initiating the catalytic cycle and is possible on account of a reduction in the resonance stabilization of the N-aroyl functionality versus a conventional aromatic amide.

Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling

Synthesis of Biaryls through Nickel-Catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling of Amides by Carbon–Nitrogen Bond Cleavage (pages 6959–6963)Shicheng Shi, Guangrong Meng and Prof. Dr. Michal Szostak

Version of Record online: 21 APR 2016 | DOI: 10.1002/anie.201601914

Thumbnail image of graphical abstract

Breaking and making: The first nickel-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of amides for the synthesis of biaryl compounds through N−C amide bond cleavage is reported. The reaction tolerates a wide range of sensitive and electronically diverse substituents on both coupling partners.

STR1

STR1

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.70 (s, 4 H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H).

 

STR1

13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.87, 139.92, 129.48 (q, J F = 32.5 Hz), 129.13, 128.32, 127.56, 127.42, 125.83 (q, J F = 3.8 Hz), 124.46 (q, J F = 270.0 Hz).

 

STR1

19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3) δ -62.39.

//////Nickel-Catalyzed,  Decarbonylative Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling,  Amides, Biaryls

Share
Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: