ENHANCEMENT OF DISSOLUTION RATE AND SOLUBILITY OF LOSARTAN POTASSIUM BY USING SOLID DISPERSION METHOD β-CYCLODEXTRIN AS CARRIER
Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy*, CH.Soujanya, MD. Fazal ul Haq
Dr. M. Sunitha Reddy*, CH.Soujanya, MD. Fazal ul Haq
Recent progress on fluorination in aqueous media
*Corresponding authors
Advances in aqueous fluorination during the last few decades are summarized in this review. Fluorinated compounds have dominated a large percentage of agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals and a mass of functional materials. The incorporation of fluorine atoms into organic molecules has become one of the mainstream technologies for their functional modification. Water is very environmentally friendly and has advantageous physicochemical properties. Fluorination reactions in aqueous media are highly sought-after, and have attracted great attention in research areas ranging from medicinal chemistry to materials science. In early times and for a long time, fluorination was thought to be diametrically opposed to water or moisture. However, recent examples have conflicted with this viewpoint. The successful merger of “untamed” fluorine and “mild” water in chemical reactions has set up a new prospect for green chemistry. A considerable amount of remarkable research works have been carried out using water as a (co)solvent and/or a reactant for transformations including electrophilic, radical, or nucleophilic fluorination. We hope that this review will serve as a guide to better understand and to further broaden the field of fluorine chemistry in aqueous conditions.
Conclusion
The installation of fluorine atoms into organic and organometallic frameworks can dramatically change their physical, chemical, and biological properties. Organofluorides have entered many fields of science and technology with a tremendous impact on these domains. The development of efficient, selective, and mild methods to build C-F bonds is of great importance, which is highly desirable to keep up with the rapidly growing demand of novel fluorine-containing scaffolds. In early times, most fluorination reactions required harsh conditions and moisture-sensitive, highly toxic, and explosive atomic fluorine transfer agents like fluorine gas, xenon difluoride, hypofluorite, antimonytrifluoride, and diethylaminosulfurtrifluoride. The discovery of stable electrophilic fluorination reagents such as Selectflour and NFSI has remarkably changed the dilemma, which realized a large number of safe, mild, and easily controllable electrophilic and radical fluorination reactions in aqueous media. Although the exact mechanisms are still unclear at present, it does never hamper the green fluorination method development with these reagents. A mass of successful examples have confirmed that the aqueous reaction medias have positive impacts on electrophilic and radical fluorination reactions with using the N-F reagents and in many cases water can also be a nucleophile for the entire conversions.
In addition, water was generally thought to be an unsuitable medium for nucleophilic fluorination because the fluoride ions can be “trapped” in aqueous medias by hydrogen bonding and become unreactive. Thus, their use in organic synthesis has been quite limited to polar aprotic solvents. Although the strong hydrogen bond formed between fluoride and water diminished the nucleophilicity of fluoride ions, the recent examples of nucleophilic fluorination in aqueous media have implied that this “negative” effect does not always harm the reaction. Besides, the radioisotope 18F has been considered to be a good choice for PET imaging owing to its desirable radiochemical properties. With a half-life of 110 minutes, the introduction of [ 18F]fluorine atoms into biomolecules has to be completed in a swift manner to minimize the loss of radioactivity. Nucleophilic incorporation of [18F]F‒ in aqueous conditions could rapidly produce [18F]fluorinesubstituted biomolecules, which avoided azeotropic drying process, shortened the production time, and minimized the loss of activity. We summarized the recent aqueous fluorination reactions in three sections according to their possible mechanisms. The successful amalgamation of “ill-tempered” fluorine and “benign” water has boded well for green fluorine chemistry. Water behaves as a cosolvent to dissolve fluorination reagents and/or as a reactant for bifunctionalization. Since the aspects of green chemistry has drawn much attention from the society, the pursuit of more efficient and milder reaction conditions for greener fluorination in aqueous medias will never end. Although a large number of research works have been published in this area, it’s only the tip of the iceberg with a wide scope for improvement. We hope that this review will serve as a guide to understand and to further broaden the field of aqueous fluorine chemistry. To meet the principle of green chemistry in modern synthesis, the development of new fluorination reagents as well as valid catalytic systems is crucial for mild and selective C-F bond formation. It’s undoubted that a growing number of green fluorination methodologies in aqueous media will be witnessed in the near future.
///////////
Advances in indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 medicinal chemistry
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) mediates multiple immunoregulatory processes including the induction of regulatory T cell differentiation and activation, suppression of T cell immune responses and inhibition of dendritic cell function, which impair immune recognition of cancer cells and promote tumor growth. On this basis, this enzyme is widely recognized as a valuable drug target for the development of immunotherapeutic small molecules in oncology. Although medicinal chemistry has made a substantial contribution to the discovery of numerous chemical classes of potent IDO1 inhibitors in the past 20 years, only very few compounds have progressed in clinical trials. In this review, we provide an overview of the current understanding of structure–function relationships of the enzyme, and discuss structure–activity relationships of selected classes of inhibitors that have shaped the hitherto few successes of IDO1 medicinal chemistry. An outlook opinion is also given on trends in the design of next generation inhibitors of the enzyme.
Introduction Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenases (IDOs) are heme-containing proteins that catalyze the oxidative cleavage of the indole ring of tryptophan (L-Trp, 1) to produce N-formyl kynurenine (2) in the first rate limiting step of the kynurenine pathway (Figure 1).1,2 The family includes two related enzymatic isoforms, namely IDO1 and IDO2, sharing ∼60% of sequence similarity and featuring distinct biochemical features.3,4 A third enzyme of the family is the tryptophan-2,3-dioxygenase (TDO2) which is structurally unrelated to IDO1 and IDO2 and is endowed with a more stringent substrate specificity for L-Trp.5 Although TDO2 is expressed almost exclusively in hepatocytes where it regulates L-Trp catabolism in response to the diet, IDO1 and IDO2 are widely expressed in macrophages and dendritic cells exerting immunoregulatory functions.6 These are accomplished through two major mechanisms including depletion of tryptophan and production of bioactive metabolites along the kynurenine pathway. Specifically, the first mechanism postulates that raising levels of Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) induce IDO1 expression in macrophages and dendritic cells during pathogen infection, leading to consumption of L-Trp and growth arrest of pathogens, whose diet is sensitive to this essential nutrient.7 The second mechanism grounds on production of kynurenine metabolites that bind to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), activating signaling pathways that enhance immune tolerance.8-10 Among the three proteins, IDO1 is the most characterized enzyme and in recent years a second signal-transducing function was revealed for this protein.11,12 In particular, this signalling function relies on the presence of two immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) in the non-catalytic domain of IDO1.13 The immunosuppressive cytokine transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) stimulates phosphorylation of ITIMs by Sarcoma-family (Src-family) kinases and consequent interaction of the phosphorylated enzyme with Src Homology 2 domain Phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) and Src Homology 2 domain Phosphatase-2 (SHP-2), eventually leading to long-term expression of IDO1 and immune tolerance. Conversely, in pro-inflammatory environmental conditions, increasing levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) trigger the interaction of
phosphorylated IDO1 with suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 (SOCS3) that tags the enzyme for proteasome degradation, shortening IDO1’s half-life and promoting inflammatory response.14 The breakthrough discovery that IDO1 plays a crucial role in the maintenance of maternal immune tolerance ushered in a great deal of interest on the enzyme, by then considered a master regulatory hub of immunosuppressive pathways in pregnancy, autoimmune diseases, chronic inflammation, and cancer.15 In this framework, elevated levels of IDO1 expression found in several tumour cells were associated to the participation of the enzyme in the tumor immuno-editing process which sets up immune tolerance to tumor antigens.16,17 On this basis, academic groups and pharmaceutical companies have been engaged in the development of IDO1 inhibitors.18 Although part of these efforts has proved successful, with a large array of potent and selective inhibitors being disclosed in literature and patent applications, only few compounds have hitherto entered clinical trials (3-7, Figure 1).2,19-22 At this regard, some studies have highlighted challenges in the development of enzyme inhibitors mostly due to redox properties of the enzyme that may account for unspecific mechanism of inhibition of many compounds discovered in preclinical studies.23,24 Starting with an overview on the architecture of IDO1 and its structure-function relationships, in this article we discuss selected classes of inhibitors that have shaped advances in the medicinal chemistry of IDO1, providing outlooks on future trends in the design of next generation compounds.
//////////
3b R = NITRO
![]() |
Dr. Helen P. KavithaProfessor and Head of the Department |
|||||||||
Education
|
||||||||||
Other Details:Course
Research Interests
Selected PublicationS
Working Papers
Academic Experiences
Other Professional Experiences
Achievement and Award
|
///////////////
Control of stereoselectivity of benzylic hydroxylation catalysed by wild-type cytochrome P450BM3 using decoy molecules
The hydroxylation of non-native substrates catalysed by wild-type P450BM3 is reported, wherein “decoy molecules”, i.e., native substrate mimics, controlled the stereoselectivity of hydroxylation reactions. We employed decoy molecules with diverse structures, resulting in either a significant improvement in enantioselectivity or clear inversion of stereoselectivity in the benzylic hydroxylation of alkylbenzenes and cycloalkylbenzenes. For example, supplementation of wild-type P450BM3 with 5-cyclohexylvaleric acid-L-phenylalanine (5CHVA-Phe) and Z-proline-L-phenylalanine yielded 53% (R) ee and 56% (S) ee for indane hydroxylation, respectively, although 16% (S) ee was still observed in the absence of any additives. Moreover, we performed a successful crystal structure analysis of 5CHVA-L-tryptophan-bound P450BM3 at 2.00 Å, which suggests that the changes in selectivity observed were caused by conformational changes in the enzyme induced by binding of the decoy molecules.
M2 | Kazuto Suzuki | \ | suzuki.kazuto*c.mbox.nagoya-u.ac.jp |
Yoshihito Watanabe | yoshi*nucc.cc.nagoya-u.ac.jp |
/////////////////
Department of Chemistry, University of Louisville
Pravin C. Patil and Frederick A. Luzzio*
Department of Chemistry, University of Louisville, 2320South Brook Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40292
Faluzz01@louisville.edu
*Corresponding Author: Email: faluzz01@louisville.edu
J Org. Chem., 2016, 81(21), pp 10521–10526.
Publication Date (Web): July 21, 2016 (Note)
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01280
Typical Procedure for Aluminum/HgCl2-Mediated Desulfonylation for Synthesis of 4 (Eq. 1) and 18 (Table 2). To a solution of the alkylated 2-(sulfonylethyl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 5 (0.12 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and crystals of mercuric chloride (0.034 mmol, 0.3 equiv), in methanol (15 mL), was added an excess of food-grade aluminum foil (2.32 mmol, 20 equiv) with vigorous stirring under a nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting heterogeneous mixture was heated at reflux until the metal disappeared. The reaction mixture was then allowed to cool to room temperature and filtered through a Celite bed followed by washing with methanol (2 x 15mL). The filtrate was concentrated to a crude residue which was submitted to gravity-column chromatography on silica gel to provide 2-methyl-4,5-diphenyloxazole 4 (96%) or 2-ethyl-4,5-diphenyloxazole 18 (97%).
General procedure for Magnesium/HgCl2-Mediated Desulfonylation of Alkylated Sulfones 5-17. To a stirred solution of an alkylated 2-(phenylsulfonyl)methyl-4,5-diphenyloxazole (0.12 mmol, 1.0 equiv. from Table 1) in methanol (5 mL) was added magnesium turnings (1.73 mmol, 15 equiv) and crystals of mercuric chloride (0.012 mmol, 0.1 equiv) at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature (2 h) while monitoring the reaction progress by TLC. After the reaction was complete, the reaction mixture was filtered through a Celite bed followed by washing with methanol (2 x 10 mL). The filtrate was concentrated and the resultant crude residue was submitted to gravity-column chromatography on silica gel (hexane/ethyl acetate) to afford the pure products 18–27 listed in Table 2.
Typical Procedure for Aluminum/HgCl2-Mediated Desulfonylation for Synthesis of 4 (Eq. 1) and 18 (Table 2). To a solution of the alkylated 2-(sulfonylethyl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 5 (0.12 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and crystals of mercuric chloride (0.034 mmol, 0.3 equiv), in methanol (15 mL), was added an excess of food-grade aluminum foil (2.32 mmol, 20 equiv) with vigorous stirring under a nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting heterogeneous mixture was heated at reflux until the metal disappeared. The reaction mixture was then allowed to cool to room temperature and filtered through a Celite bed followed by washing with methanol (2 x 15mL). The filtrate was concentrated to a crude residue which was submitted to gravity-column chromatography on silica gel to provide 2-methyl-4,5-diphenyloxazole 4 (96%) or 2-ethyl-4,5-diphenyloxazole 18 (97%).
General procedure for Magnesium/HgCl2-Mediated Desulfonylation of Alkylated Sulfones 5-17. To a stirred solution of an alkylated 2-(phenylsulfonyl)methyl-4,5-diphenyloxazole (0.12 mmol, 1.0 equiv. from Table 1) in methanol (5 mL) was added magnesium turnings (1.73 mmol, 15 equiv) and crystals of mercuric chloride (0.012 mmol, 0.1 equiv) at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature (2 h) while monitoring the reaction progress by TLC. After the reaction was complete, the reaction mixture was filtered through a Celite bed followed by washing with methanol (2 x 10 mL). The filtrate was concentrated and the resultant crude residue was submitted to gravity-column chromatography on silica gel (hexane/ethyl acetate) to afford the pure products 18–27 listed in Table 2.
Typical procedure: Synthesis of Oxaprozin
Ethyl 3-(4,5-diphenyloxazol-2-yl)-3-(phenylsulfonyl)propanoate (28). To a prechilled solution of 2-(phenylsulfonyl)methyl-4,5-diphenyloxazole 3 (100 mg, 0.27 mmol) in dry THF (15 mL) was added potassium tert-butoxide (33 mg, 0.29 mmol) under a nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting yellow solution was stirred (5°C) for 30 min. To the reaction mixture was slowly added ethyl bromoacetate (49 mg, 32.4 μL, 0.29 mmol) and stirring was continued (16 h) at room temperature. Upon completion of reaction as indicated by TLC, the reaction mixture was quenched with cold water (20 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (2 x 20 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated to obtain a crude oily residue. The residue was submitted to gravity-column chromatography on silica gel (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1) afford pure ethyl 3-(4,5-diphenyloxazol-2-yl)-3-(phenylsulfonyl)propanoate 28 as off-white solid ( 88 mg, 72%).
Ethyl 3-(4,5-diphenyloxazol-2-yl)acrylate (29). To a cooled (5°C) solution of sulfonyloxazole ester 28 (225 mg, 0.49 mmol) in dry THF was added potassium tert-butoxide (60.2 mg, 0.54 mmol) under nitrogen and the reaction mixture was then stirred at 5-10°C (2 h) while monitoring by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (2 x 25 mL) followed by washing the extracts with water and brine then drying over anhydrous Na2SO4. Removal of the drying agent and concentration of the filtrate gave a crude residue which was submitted to gravity-column chromatography (hexane/ethylacetate, 4:1) to provide unsaturated oxazole ester 29 as a colorless oil (100 mg, 65%).
Ethyl 3-(4,5-diphenyloxazol-2-yl)propanoate (30).17 The unsaturated oxazole ester 30 (160 mg, 0.50 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (25 mL) then 10% Pd/C (16 mg, 10% wt/wt) was added at room temperature. The reaction mixture was purged with nitrogen while stirring followed by the addition of hydrogen gas (balloon) and then stirring was continued (16 h) under an atmosphere of hydrogen. Upon completion of reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered through a bed of Celite while washing with methanol (2 x 30 mL). The combined filtrates were concentrated and the crude residue was submitted to gravity-column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1) to afford 30 as an off-white solid (129 mg, 80%).
Methyl 3-(4,5-diphenyloxazol-2-yl)propanoate (31).13 To a clear solution of sulfonyloxazole ester 28 (80 mg, 0.173 mmol) in methanol (10 mL) was added magnesium turnings (63 mg, 2.60 mmol) followed by solid mercuric chloride (4.7 mg, 0.017 mmol) at room temperature. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred (2 h) while monitoring the reaction progress by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the heterogeneous mixture was then filtered through a Celite bed followed by washing with methanol (2 x 15 mL). The methanolic filtrates were combined and concentrated to afford a crude residue. The residue was submitted to gravity-column chromatography (hexane/ethylacetate, 4:1) to provide ester 31 as an off-white solid (52 mg, 97%).
3-(4,5-Diphenyloxazol-2-yl)propanoic acid (Oxaprozin) (32).13 Ethyl ester 30 (128 mg, 0.39 mmol) or methyl ester 31 (65 mg, 0.21 mmol) and 20% aquous NaOH solution (3 mL) was stirred overnight at room temperature. Upon completion of reaction as indicated by TLC, the reaction mixture was slowly acidified to pH 3-4 using conc. HCl (3 mL) at room temperature and stirring was continued (3 h). After the neutralization was complete the reaction mixture was diluted with cold water (15 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (2 x 15 mL). The organic extracts were combined, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated to give a white solid residue. The residue was submitted to gravity-column chromatography (chloroform/methanol, 9:1) to afford pure Oxaprozin 32 as white solid (80 mg, 68%, from the ethyl ester 30) or (60 mg, 97%, from the methyl ester 31).
ABOUT GUEST BLOGGER
see…….http://oneorganichemistoneday.blogspot.in/2017/04/dr-pravin-patil.html
Dr. Pravin C Patil completed his B.Sc. (Chemistry) at ASC College Chopda (Jalgaon, Maharashtra, India) in 2001 and M.Sc. (Organic Chemistry) at SSVPS’S Science College Dhule in North Maharashtra University (Jalgaon, Maharashtra, India) in year 2003. After M.Sc. degree he was accepted for summer internship training program at Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC, Mumbai) in the laboratory of Prof. Subrata Chattopadhyay in Bio-organic Division. In 2003, Dr. Pravin joined to API Pharmaceutical bulk drug company, RPG Life Science (Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India) and worked there for two years. In 2005, he enrolled into Ph.D. (Chemistry) program at Institute of Chemical Technology (ICT), Matunga, Mumbai, aharashtra, under the supervision of Prof. K. G. Akamanchi in the department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology.
After finishing Ph.D. in 2010, he joined to Pune (Maharashtra, India) based pharmaceutical industry, Lupin Research Park (LRP) in the department of process development. After spending two years at Lupin as a Research Scientist, he got an opportunity in June 2012 to pursue Postdoctoral studies at Hope College, Holland, MI, USA under the supervision of Prof. Moses Lee. During year 2012-13 he worked on total synthesis of achiral anticancer molecules Duocarmycin and its analogs. In 2014, he joined to Prof. Frederick Luzzio at the Department for Chemistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA to pursue postdoctoral studies on NIH sponsored project “ Structure based design and synthesis of Peptidomimetics targeting P. gingivalis.
During his research experience, he has authored 23 international publications in peer reviewed journals and inventor for 4 patents.
Prof K. G. Akamanchi
SEE…………
The long term goals of our research are focused at the interface of chemistry and biology. We are interested in solving problems in biomedicine using the techniques and application of synthetic organic, medicinal and natural products chemistry. Toward our goals in biomedicine we concentrate our efforts in the following three areas of organic chemistry: (1) the development of new methods and strategy which are applicable to the synthesis of biologically active compounds; (2) the total synthesis of a wide range of complex molecules including natural products, pharmaceutical leads and their analogues; and (3) the isolation and discovery of biologically active compounds from natural sources. Within our objectives in item 1 (above), we have had a long-term collaboration with the Clinical Pharmacology Section of the National Cancer Institute in which we have synthesized metabolites and analogues of thalidomide, a small-molecule immunomodulator and angiogenesis inhibitor. The derivatives and analogues of thalidomide were stereospecifically synthesized in order to ascertain the mode of action and the molecular target of this small molecule. Ultimately, the synthetic studies are leading to analogues of thalidomide which are more potent, but which have less undesirable side effects than the parent compound. In the neurosciences area we have completed an enantioselective synthesis of both optical isomers of a key intermediate in preparing the histrionicotoxins, a group of compounds which are isolated for the neurotoxic Amazon “poison dart” frogs. One of our present natural products projects (under item 3,above) entails the isolation, neurotoxicity assays and synthesis of a series of naturally-occurring compounds called acetogenins from the North American paw paw tree Asimina triloba. The isolation, purification and structural confirmation of the natural products has been conducted in collaboration with the Neurosciences Department within the University of Louisville School of Medicine. In the area of anti-infectives (under 1), we are designing and synthesizing an array of nitrogen and nitrogen/oxygen heterocyclic scaffolds bearing acetylenic and azido groups for use in the so-called “click reaction.” The multiply-connected scaffolds have proven to be effective for inhibiting micro-organisms working in tandem to produce biofilms necessary for their establishment and survival.
1976 B.S. Vanderbilt University
1979 M.S. Tufts University
1982 Ph.D. Tufts University
1982-1985 Postdoctoral Fellow, Harvard University
Executive Committee/Treasurer, International Society of Heterocyclic Chemistry HETCHEM@louisville.edu
Gordon Research Conferences on Natural Products 2009
The Natural Products Gordon Conference. 1951-2011
///////
CAS 17902-23-7
172-173 °C |
Miyashita, Osamu; Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 1981, 29(11), PG 3181-90
Tegafur (INN, BAN, USAN) is a chemotherapeutic prodrug of 5-flourouracil (5-FU) used in the treatment of cancers. It is a component of the combination drug tegafur/uracil. When metabolised, it becomes 5-FU.[1]
As a prodrug to 5-FU it is used in the treatment of the following cancers:[2]
It is often given in combination with drugs that alter its bioavailability and toxicity such as gimeracil, oteracil or uracil.[2] These agents achieve this by inhibiting the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (uracil/gimeracil) or orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (oteracil).[2]
The major side effects of tegafur are similar to fluorouracil and include myelosuppression, central neurotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity (especially diarrhoea).[2] Gastrointestinal toxicity is the dose-limiting side effect of tegafur.[2] Central neurotoxicity is more common with tegafur than with fluorouracil.[2]
The dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme is responsible for the detoxifying metabolism of fluoropyrimidines, a class of drugs that includes 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, and tegafur.[4] Genetic variations within the DPD gene (DPYD) can lead to reduced or absent DPD activity, and individuals who are heterozygous or homozygous for these variations may have partial or complete DPD deficiency; an estimated 0.2% of individuals have complete DPD deficiency.[4][5] Those with partial or complete DPD deficiency have a significantly increased risk of severe or even fatal drug toxicities when treated with fluoropyrimidines; examples of toxicities include myelosuppression, neurotoxicity and hand-foot syndrome.[4][5]
It is a prodrug to 5-FU, which is a thymidylate synthase inhibitor.[2]
It is metabolised to 5-FU by CYP2A6.[6][7]
Click on genes, proteins and metabolites below to link to respective articles.[§ 1]
The interactive pathway map can be edited at WikiPathways: “FluoropyrimidineActivity_WP1601”.
MASS SPECTRUM
1H NMR
IR
13C NMR
RAMAN
Synthesis
CAS-RN | Formula | Chemical Name | CAS Index Name |
---|---|---|---|
58138-78-6 | C10H19FN2O2Si2 | 1,3-bis(trimethylsilyl)fluorouracil | 2,4(1H,3H)-Pyrimidinedione, 5-fluoro-1,3-bis(trimethylsilyl)- |
13369-70-5 | C4H7ClO | 2-chlorotetrahydrofuran | Furan, 2-chlorotetrahydro- |
1191-99-7 | C4H6O | 2,3-dihydrofuran | Furan, 2,3-dihydro- |
51-21-8 | C4H3FN2O2 | 5-fluorouracil | 2,4(1H,3H)-Pyrimidinedione, 5-fluoro- |
SYN1
CN 106397416
SYN 2
Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis, 356(16), 3325-3330; 2014
PATENTS
CN 106397416
CN 104513230
CN 103159746
PATENT
tegafur is a derivative of 5-fluorouracil, and in 1967, Hiller of the former Soviet Union synthesized tegafur (SA Hiller, RA Zhuk, M. Yu. Lidak, et al. Substituted Uracil [ P, British Patent, 1168391 (1969)). In 1974, it was listed in Japan. China was successfully developed by Shandong Jinan Pharmaceutical Factory in 1979. Its present origin is Shanghai and Shandong provinces and cities. The anti-cancer effect of tegafur is similar to that of 5-fluorouracil and is activated in vivo by 5-fluorouracil through liver activation. Unlike 5-fluorouracil, tegafur is fat-soluble, has good oral absorption, maintains high concentrations in the blood for a long time and easily passes through the blood-brain barrier. Clinical and animal experiments show that tegafur on gastrointestinal cancer, breast cancer is better, the role of rectal cancer than 5-fluorouracil good, less toxic than 5-fluorouracil. Teflon has a chemotherapy index of 2-fold for 5-fluorouracil and only 1 / 4-1 / 7 of toxicity. So the addition of fluoride is widely used in cancer patients with chemotherapy.
[0003] The first synthesis of tegafur is Hiller ([SA Hiller, RA Zhuk, Μ. Yu. Lidak, et al. Substituted Uracil [P], British Patent, 1168391 (1969)]. 5-fluorouracil or 2,4-bis (trimethylsilyl) -5-fluorouracil (Me3Si-Fu, 1) and 2-chlorotetrahydrofuran (Thf-Cl), and it is reported that this synthesis must be carried out at low temperature (- 20 to -40 ° C), because Thf-Cl is unstable, and excess Thf-Cl results in a decomposition reaction, thereby reducing the yield of Thf-Fu.
[0004] Earl and Townsend also prepared 1_ (tetrahydro-2-furyl) uracil using Thf-Cl and 2,4-bis (trimethylsilyl) uracil, and then using trifluoromethyl fluorite to product Fluorination. Mitsugi Yasurnoto reacts with the Friedel-Crafts catalyst in the presence of 2,4-bis (trimethylsilyl) -5-fluorouracil (Me3Si-U, 1) 2-acetoxytetrahydrofuran (Thf-OAc, 2) (Kazu Kigasawa et al., 2-tert-Butoxy), & lt; RTI ID = 0.0 & gt;, & lt; / RTI & gt; (K. Kigasawa, M. Hiiragi, K. ffakisaka, et al. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1977, 14: 473-475) was reacted with 5-Fu at 155-160 ° C. Reported in the literature for the fluoride production route there are the following questions: 1, high energy consumption. In the traditional synthesis method, in order to obtain the product, the second step of the reaction needs to continue heating at 160 ° C for 5-6 hours, high energy consumption; 2, difficult to produce, low yield: 5-fluorouracil as a solid powder The reaction needs to be carried out at a high temperature (160 ° C), which requires the use of a high boiling solvent N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF). But it is difficult to completely remove the fluoride from the addition of fluoride, because DMF can form hydrogen bonds with the fluoride molecules, difficult to separate from each other; 3, in order to unreacted 5-fluorouracil and tegafur separation and recycling , The use of carcinogenic solvent chloroform as a extractant in the conventional method to separate 5-fluorouracil and tegafur. However, the main role of chloroform on the central nervous system, with anesthesia, the heart, liver, kidney damage; the environment is also harmful to the water can cause pollution. Therefore, the use of volatile solvent chloroform, even if the necessary measures to reduce its volatilization, will still cause harm to human health and the environment; 4, low yield. Since both NI and N-3 in the 5-fluorouracil molecule react with 2-tert-butoxytetrahydrofuran, the addition of tegafur is also the addition of 1,3-bis (tetrahydro-2-furyl) -5 – Fluorouracil. Therefore, the improvement of the traditional production process of tegafur is a significant and imminent task.
Example 1 (for example, the best reaction conditions):
Weigh 3.5 g (50 mmol) of 2,3-dihydrofuran, 1.9 g (50 mmol) of ethanol was added to a one-necked flask. To this was added 15 ml of tetrahydrofuran (THF). And then weighed 10. 0 mg CuCl2, microwave irradiation 250W at 25 ° C reaction 0. 6h. Cool to room temperature, add 1.95 g (15 mmol) of 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu), and microwave irradiation at 400 ° C for 100 ° C. After distilling off the low boiling solvent, the oil was obtained. Rinsed with ether to give a white solid which was recrystallized from anhydrous ethanol to give 1.34349 g of product. Melting point: 160-165 ° C. The yield was 75%.
[0011] Example 2
Weigh 3,5 g (50 mmol) of 2,3-dihydrofuran and 3.8 g (100 mmol) of ethanol were added to a single-necked flask. To this was added 15 ml of tetrahydrofuran (THF). And then weighed 5mg CuCl2, microwave irradiation 250W at 25 ° C for 0.6h. Cool to room temperature, add 1.95 g (15 mmol) of 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu), microwave irradiation 400W, reaction temperature 60 ° C under the reaction pool. The low boiling solvent was distilled off to give an oil. Rinsed with ether to give a white solid which was recrystallized from absolute ethanol to give the product 0. 46 g. Melting point: 160-165 ° C. The yield was 15%.
[0012] Example 3
Weigh 3.5 g (50 mmol) of 2,3-dihydrofuran, 1.9 g (50 mmol) of ethanol was added to a one-necked flask. To this was added 15 ml of tetrahydrofuran (THF). And then weighed 20mg CuCl2, microwave irradiation 250W at 25 ° C for 0.6h. Cooled to room temperature, add 1.95 g (15 to 01) 5-fluorouracil (5 call 11), microwave irradiation 2001, reaction temperature 1301: reaction lh. The low boiling solvent was distilled off to give an oil. Rinsed with ether to give a white solid which was recrystallized from anhydrous ethanol to give the product 1.81 g. Melting point: 160-165 ° C. The yield was 61%.
[0013] Example 4
Weigh 3.5 g (50 mmol) of 2,3-dihydrofuran and 19 g (500 mmol) of ethanol were added to a single-necked flask. To this was added 20 ml of tetrahydrofuran (THF). And then weighed IOmg CuCl2, microwave irradiation 250W at 25 ° C for 0.6h. Cooled to room temperature, add 1.95 g (15 to 01) 5-fluorouracil (5 call 11), microwave irradiation 2001, reaction temperature 1101: reaction lh. The low boiling solvent was distilled off to give an oil. Rinsed with ether to give a white solid which was recrystallized from absolute ethanol to give product U6g. Melting point: 160-165 ° C. The yield was 43%.
[0014] Example 5
Weigh 3,5 g (50 mmol) of 2,3-dihydrofuran and 9.5 g (250 mmol) of ethanol were added to a single-necked flask. To this was added 30 ml of tetrahydrofuran (THF). And then weighed IOmg CuCl2, microwave irradiation 250W at 25 ° C for 0.6h. Cooled to room temperature, add 1.95 g (15 to 01) 5-fluorouracil (5 call 11), microwave irradiation 6001, reaction temperature 1001: reaction lh. The low boiling solvent was distilled off to give an oil. Rinsed with ether to give a white solid which was recrystallized from absolute ethanol to give 1.15 g of product. Melting point: 160-165 ° C. The yield was 38%.
[0015] Example 6
Weigh 3.5 g (50 mmol) of 2,3-dihydrofuran, 1.9 g (50 mmol) of ethanol was added to a one-necked flask. To this was added 25 ml of tetrahydrofuran (THF). And then weighed 15mg CuCl2, microwave irradiation 250W at 25 ° C for 0.6h. Cooled to room temperature, add 1.95 g (15 to 01) 5-fluorouracil (5 call 11), microwave irradiation 5001, reaction temperature 1101: reaction lh. The low boiling solvent was distilled off to give an oil. Rinsed with ether to give a white solid which was recrystallized from anhydrous ethanol to give product 2.10 g. Melting point: 160-165 ° C. The yield was 70%.
Paper
A novel protocol for preparation of tegafur (a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil) is reported. The process involves the 1,8-diazabicycloundec-7-ene-mediated alkylation of 5-fluorouracil with 2-acetoxytetrahydrofuran at 90 °C, followed by treatment of the prepurified mixture of the alkylation products with aqueous ethanol at 70 °C. The yield of the two-step process is 72%.
Aleksandra Zasada, Ewa Mironiuk-Puchalska, and Mariola Koszytkowska-Stawińska*
Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, ul. Noakowskiego 3, 00-664 Warszawa, Poland
Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.7b00103
*E-mail: mkoszyt@ch.pw.edu.pl.
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.oprd.7b00103
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.oprd.7b00103/suppl_file/op7b00103_si_001.pdf
Tegafur, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FUra), was discovered in 1967. The compound features high lipophilicity and water solubility compared to 5-FUra. Tegafur is used as a racemate since no significant difference in antitumor activity of enantiomers was observed.
The prodrug is gradually converted to 5-FUra by metabolism in the liver. Hence, a rapid breakdown of the released 5-FUra in the gastrointestinal tract is avoided.(6) In injectable form, tegafur provoked serious side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, or central nervous system disturbances.
The first generation of oral formulation of tegafur , UFT) is a combination of tegafur and uracil in a fixed molar ratio of 1:4, respectively. The uracil slows the metabolism of 5-FUra and reduces production of 2-fluoro-α-alanine as the toxic metabolite. UFT was approved in 50 countries worldwide excluding the USA.
S-1 is the next generation of oral formulation of tegafur.(7) It is a combination of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil in a fixed molar ratio of 1:0.4:1, respectively.
Gimeracil inhibits the enzyme responsible for the degradation of 5-FUra. Oteracil prevents the activation of 5-FUra in the gastrointestinal tract, thus minimizing the gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-FUra. S-1 is well-tolerated, but its safety can be influenced by schedule and dose, similar to any other cytotoxic agent. Since common side effects of S-1 can be managed with antidiarrheal and antiemetic medications, the drug can be administered in outpatient settings. S-1 was approved in Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea, and Singapore for the treatment of patients with gastric cancer.
In 2010, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), a division of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), recommended the use of S-1 for the treatment of adults with advanced gastric cancer when given in a combination with cisplatin. Currently, S-1 has not been approved by the FDA in the United States.
There is a great interest in further examination of S-1 as an anticancer chemotherapeutic. Currently, 23 clinical trials with S-1 has been registered in National Institutes of Health (NIH). Combinations of S-1 and other anticancer agents have been employed in a majority of these trials.
5-Fluoro-1-(tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)pyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione (Tegafur)
δH 1.89–2.10 (m, 3H), 2.38–2.45 (m, 1H), 3.97–4.01 (q-like m, 1H), 4.20–4.24 (dq-like m), 5.97–5.98 (m, 1H), 7.41 (d, 3JHF 6.1), 9.21 (bs, 1H, NH).
δC 23.82, 32.90, 70.26, 87.58, 123.63 (d, 2JCF 33.89), 140.33 (d, 1JCF 237.20) 148.66, 156.9 (d, 2JCF 26.81).
HRMS m/z calcd for C8H10N2O3F [M – H]+ 201.0670, found 201.0669.
Elemental analysis. Found C%, 46.42; H%, 4.45; N%, 13.35. Calcd for 3(C8H9N2O3F)·H2O: C%, 46.61; H%, 4.73; N%, 13.59.
Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN85108855A * | Nov 6, 1985 | Sep 24, 1986 | Central Chemical Research Institute | Preparation of 1- (2-tetrahydrofuryl) -5-fluorouracil |
GB1168391A * | Title not available | |||
JPS5452085A * | Title not available | |||
JPS5455581A * | Title not available | |||
JPS5459288A * | Title not available | |||
JPS52118479A * | Title not available | |||
JPS54103880A * | Title not available | |||
US4256885 * | Dec 10, 1976 | Mar 17, 1981 | Mitsui Toatsu Kagaku Kabushiki Kaisha | Process for the preparation of 1- (2-tetrahydrofuryl) -5-fluorouracil |
US5075446 * | Oct 12, 1990 | Dec 24, 1991 | Korea Advanced Institute Of Science & Technology | Synthesis of tetrahydro-2-furylated pyrimidine derivatives |
Reference | ||
---|---|---|
1 | * | KAZUO KIGASAWA, et al .: ” Studies on the Synthesis of Chemotherapeutics. Synthetic of 1- (2-Tetrahydrofuryl) -5-fluorouracil [Ftorafur] (Studies on the Syntheses of Heterocyclic Compound. Part 703) “, “J. HETEROCCLIC CHEM ., Vol. 14, 31 May 1977 (1977-05-31), pages 473 – 475 |
1
Matt P, van Zwieten-Boot B, Calvo Rojas G, Ter Hofstede H, Garcia-Carbonero R, Camarero J, Abadie E, Pignatti F (October 2011). “The European Medicines Agency review of Tegafur/Gimeracil/Oteracil (Teysuno™) for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer when given in combination with cisplatin: summary of the Scientific Assessment of the Committee for medicinal products for human use (CHMP).” (PDF). The Oncologist. 16 (10): 1451–1457. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0224. PMC 3228070 . PMID 21963999.
MORE
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Clinical data | |
---|---|
AHFS/Drugs.com | International Drug Names |
Pregnancy category |
|
Routes of administration |
Oral |
ATC code | |
Legal status | |
Legal status | |
Pharmacokinetic data | |
Biological half-life | 3.9-11 hours |
Identifiers | |
Synonyms | 5-fluoro-1-(oxolan-2-yl)pyrimidine-2,4-dione |
CAS Number | |
PubChem CID | |
ChemSpider | |
UNII | |
KEGG | |
ChEMBL | |
ECHA InfoCard | 100.038.027 |
Chemical and physical data | |
Formula | C8H9FN2O3 |
Molar mass | 200.16 g/mol |
3D model (Jmol) | |
///////////TEGAFUR
FC1=CN(C2CCCO2)C(=O)NC1=O
USA Viewership touched 3 lakhs on New Drug Approvals
Total 16.9 lakhs in 213 countries
The presentation will load below
KemInnTek Laboratories
Keminntek Laboratories is a Hyderabad (India) based Contract Research Organization in Pharmaceutical sector in specific Pharmaceutical Intermediates, Speciality Chemicals, Impurities and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. Promoters of Keminntek Laboratories are Young and Dynamic Technocrats and established with a vision to provide a best-in class pharmaceutical services. Keminntek Laboratories would be a value-added and innovative-in –approach business partner. It has a strong talent pool of qualified and experienced scientists drawn from the national and international institutes and industry. It has a capability to synthesize in mg to multi-kg scale.
Team
Promoters of this company are very well qualified and experienced personalities in Pharmaceutical sector
We have a team consisting
Ph.Ds from premier Indian Institutes and postdocs from abroad
M. Sc (Chemistry) with 2-12 years pharmaceutical industry experience
Our team expertise lies in process R&D of pharmaceutical intermediates, NCEs (Medicinal Chemistry) development, pharmaceutical impurities, and custom synthesis of specialty chemicals
keminnteklabs@gmail.com |
//////////////KemInnTek Laboratories, srinivas kolupula, hyderabad, blog, cro, custom, synthesis
Sameer Dhurua, Dilip Bhedia, Dnyaneshwar Gophanea, Kiran Hirbhagata, Vijaya Nadara, Dattatray Morea, Sapna Parikha, Roda Dalala, Lyle C. Fonsecaa, Firuza Kharasa, Prashant Y. Vadnala, Ram A. Vishwakarmaa, H. Sivaramakrishnana*
aDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Piramal Life Sciences Limited, 1 Nirlon Complex, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (E), Mumbai 400 063, India
bDepartment of Pharmacology, Piramal Life Sciences Limited, 1 Nirlon Complex, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (E), Mumbai 400 063, India
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 3784–3787
[Link: http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/cc/c2cc36389e#!divAbstract]
Graphical abstract
Synthesis and anti-inflammatory activity of novel diarylheptanoids [5-hydroxy-1-phenyl-7-(pyridin-3-yl)-heptan-3-ones and 1-phenyl-7-(pyridin-3-yl)hept-4-en-3-ones] as inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α production is described in the present article. The key reactions involve the formation of a β-hydroxyketone by the reaction of substituted 4-phenyl butan-2-ones with pyridine-3-carboxaldehyde in presence of LDA and the subsequent dehydration of the same to obtain the α,β-unsaturated ketones. Compounds 4i, 5b, 5d, and 5g significantly inhibit lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-α production from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in a dose-dependent manner. Of note, the in vitro TNF-α inhibition potential of 5b and 5d is comparable to that of curcumin (a naturally occurring diarylheptanoid). Most importantly, oral administration of 4i, 5b, 5d, and 5g (each at 100 mg/kg) but not curcumin (at 100 mg/kg) significantly inhibits LPS-induced TNF-α production in BALB/c mice. Collectively, our findings suggest that these compounds may have potential therapeutic implications for TNF-α-mediated auto-immune/inflammatory disorders.
Scheme 1. Synthetic scheme
Table 1.
Table 2.
Highlights
ABOUT GUEST BLOGGER
Dr. Dnyaneshwar B. Gophane, Ph. D.
Post doc fellow at Purdue university and university of Iceland
Email, gophane@gmail.com
Dr. Dnyaneshwar B. Gophane completed his B.Sc. (Chemistry) at Anand college of science, Pathardi (Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India) in 2000 and M.Sc. (Organic Chemistry) at Department of Chemistry, University of Pune (India) in 2003. From 2003 to 2008, he worked in research and development departments of pharmaceutical companies like Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories and Nicholas Piramal India Limited, where he involved in synthesizing novel organic compounds for in vitro and in vivo screening and optimizing process for drug molecule syntheses. In 2008, Dnyaneshwar joined Prof. Sigurdsson’s laboratory for his Ph.D. study at the University of Iceland. His Ph.D. thesis mainly describes syntheses of nitroxide spin-labeled and fluorescent nucleosides and their incorporation into DNA and RNA using phosphoramidite chemistry. These modified nucleosides are useful probes for studying the structure and dynamics of nucleic acids by EPR and fluorescence spectroscopies. In 2014, after finishing his Ph.D., he worked as post doc fellow in same laboratory and mainly worked on spin labelling of RNA. At the university of Purdue in his second post doc, he was totally dedicated to syntheses of small molecules for anti-cancer activity and modification of cyclic dinucleotides for antibacterial activity. During his research experience, he has authored 8 international publications in peer reviewed journals like Chemical Communications, Chemistry- A European Journal, Journal of organic chemistry and Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry.