AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, WORLDDRUGTRACKER

Patient stem cells used to make ‘heart disease-on-a-chip’

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Patient stem cells used to make ‘heart disease-on-a-chip’
May 302014
 


Researchers use modified RNA transfection to correct genetic dysfunction in heart stem cells derived from Barth syndrome patients. The series of images show how inserting modified RNA into diseased cells causes the cells to produce functioning versions of the TAZ protein (first image: in green) that correctly localize in the mitochondria (second image: in red). When the images are merged to demonstrate this localization, green overlaps with red, giving the third image a yellow color. (Credit: Gang Wang and William Pu/Boston Children’s Hospital)

 

Harvard scientists have merged stem cell and ‘organ-on-a-chip’ technologies to grow, for the first time, functioning human heart tissue carrying an inherited cardiovascular disease. The research appears to be a big step forward for personalized medicine, as it is working proof that a chunk of tissue containing a patient’s specific genetic disorder can be replicated in the laboratory.

The work, published in Nature Medicine, is the result of a collaborative effort bringing together scientists from the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired EngineeringBoston Children’s Hospital, the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, and Harvard Medical School. It combines the ‘organs-on-chips’ expertise of Kevin Kit Parker, PhD, and stem cell and clinical insights by William Pu, MD.

read at

http://hsci.harvard.edu/news/patient-stem-cells-used-make-%E2%80%98heart-disease-chip%E2%80%99#.U4eNnBFG6qk.facebook

 

Share

1-((3-methoxyphenyl)sulfonyl)piperidine …learn spectroscopy

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on 1-((3-methoxyphenyl)sulfonyl)piperidine …learn spectroscopy
May 152014
 

1-((3-methoxyphenyl)sulfonyl)piperidine (2) is a crystalline white solid

1-((3-Methoxyphenyl)sulfonyl)piperidine: Piperidine,

1-[(3-methoxyphenyl)sulfonyl]-; (2) cas no (173681-65-7)

mp 115-116 °C;

1H NMR pdf

(400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 2.50 ppm)

δ: 1.30-1.35 (m, 2 H, N(CH2CH2)2CH2),

1.47-1.52 (m, 4 H, N(CH2CH2)2CH2),

2.85 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 4 H, N(CH2CH2)2CH2),

3.83 (s, 3 H, OMe),

7.16 (t, J = 2.1 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H),

7.25-7.30 (m, 2 H, Ar-H),

7.55 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H);

 

13C NMR pdf

(100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 39.5 ppm)

δ: 22.8, 24.7, 46.6, 55.6, 112.3, 118.7, 119.5, 130.5, 136.7, 159.5;

 

IR nmax (film)/cm-1 2940, 2851, 1597, 1478, 1359, 1340, 1318, 1287, 1241, 1167, 1098, 1040, 931, 856, 724, 688; (principal peaks);

HRMS (FTMS+p-NSF) found m/z 256.1002 [M+H]+, C12H18 NO3S requires m/z 256.1002.

 

Reverse phase HPLC analysis reveals purity >99% (run on an Agilent Zorbax SB-C18, 5 µm, 4.6 x 150 mm column (23 °C) at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min of 75:25 MeCN:H2O observed at 210 nm giving a retention time of 1.95 min, 1.0 mg/mL in MeCN).

Share

NMR EXAMPLE

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on NMR EXAMPLE
May 152014
 

<br /><br />
			Reaction Scheme: <IMG src="/images/empty.gif">Deprotection of a tert-butyldimethylsilyl ether<IMG src="/images/empty.gif">

 

1H NMR (300 MHz; (CD3)2CO)
11.76 (1 H, s, OH (naph.) [exch]),
8.74 (1 H, dd, J 8.5 and 1.0, naph.),
8.10 (1 H, d, J 9.0, naph.),
7.89 (1 H, dd, J 8.5 and 1.5, naph.),
7.86 (1 H, dd, J 6.5 and 2.0, cyclop.),
7.59 (1 H, ddd, J 8.5, 7.0 and 1.5, naph.),
7.41 (1 H, ddd, J 8.5, 7.0 and 1.0, naph.),
7.22 (1 H, d, J 9.0, naph.),
6.50 (1 H, dd, J 6.5 and 2.0, cyclop.),
6.18 (1 H, q, J 2.0, cyclop.),
5.26 (1 H, d, J 5.5, OH (cyclop.) [exch]),
4.69 (1 H, dd, J 5.5 and 2.0, cyclop.)

 


Reference s

J. H. Clark, Chem. Rev., 1980, 80, 429 doi:10.1021/cr60327a004
E. J. Corey, A. Venkateswarlu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972, 94, 6190 doi:10.1021/ja00772a043
A. B. Smith, III, G. R. Ott, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 3095 (TBAF/AcOH)
K. C. Nicolaou, S. E. Webber, Synthesis, 1986, 453 (HF.py) doi:10.1055/s-1986-31673
Share

Biological Drug Works Against MERS Virus in Lab

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Biological Drug Works Against MERS Virus in Lab
May 062014
 

 

This file photo provided by the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases shows a colorized transmission of the MERS coronavirus that emerged in 2012. Health officials on Friday, May 2, 2014 said the deadly virus from the Middle East has turned up for the first time in the U.S. (AP Photo/National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases via The Canadian Press, File)

This file photo provided by the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases shows a colorized transmission of the MERS coronavirus that emerged in 2012. Health officials on Friday, May 2, 2014 said the deadly virus from the Middle East has turned up for the first time in the U.S. (AP Photo/National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases via The Canadian Press, File)

read at

http://www.dddmag.com/news/2014/05/biological-drug-works-against-mers-virus-lab?et_cid=3921847&et_rid=523035093&type=cta

Share
May 052014
 

Semagacestat structure.svg

(2S)-2-hydroxy-3-methyl-N-((1S)-1-methyl-2-{[(1S)-3-methyl-2-oxo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepin-1-yl]amino}-2-oxoethyl)butanamide

425386-60-3

425386-60-3, LY450139, LY-450139, LY 450139
Molecular Formula: C19H27N3O4
Molecular Weight: 361.43538

Semagacestat (LY450139) was a candidate drug for a causal therapy against Alzheimer’s disease. It was originally developed by Eli Lilly and Élan, and clinical trials were conducted by Eli Lilly. Phase III trials included over 3000 patients,[2][3] but in August 2010, a disappointing interim analysis, in which semagacestat performed worse than the placebo, led to the trials being stopped.

 

Mechanism of action

β-Amyloid is a peptide of 39 to 43 amino acids. The isoforms with 40 and 42 amino acids (Aβ40/42) are the main constituents ofamyloid plaques in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease patients. β-Amyloid is formed by proteolysis of amyloid precursor protein (APP). Research on laboratory rats suggest that the soluble form of this peptide is a causative agent in the development of Alzheimer’s.

Semagacestat blocks the enzyme γ-secretase, which (along with β-secretase) is responsible for APP proteolysis.[3]

 

Clinical trials

Phase III double-blind clinical trials started in March 2008 with the IDENTITY study (Interrupting Alzheimer’s dementia by evaluatingtreatment of amyloid pathology), including 1500 patients from 22 countries. This study was intended to run until May 2011.[4] The successor trial with further 1500 patients, IDENTITY-2, started in September 2008.[5] The open-label trial IDENTITY-XT, which included patients who have completed one of the two studies, started in December 2009.[6] On 17 August 2010, it was announced that the phase III trials failed. Preliminary findings show that not only did semagacestat fail to slow disease progression, but that it was actually associated with “worsening of clinical measures of cognition and the ability to perform activities of daily living”. Furthermore, the incidence of skin cancer was significantly higher in the treatment group than the placebo group.[7]

Issues

A number of issues have already been raised during clinical trials:

  • Phase I and II studies showed a decrease of Aβ40/42 concentration in the blood plasma about three hours after application of semagacestat, but an increase of 300% 15 hours after application. No reduction was shown in the cerebrospinal fluid. As a consequence, the phase III studies worked with much higher doses.[8]
  • γ-Secretase has other targets, for example the notch receptor. It is not known whether this could cause long-term side effects.[8]
  • In a 2008, histological analysis of post-mortem brains from deceased subjects who had previously been enrolled in a phase 1 study of an experimental vaccine (Elan AN1792) demonstrated that the drug appeared to have cleared patients of amyloid plaques but did not have any significant effect on their dementia, which in some people’s mind, cast doubt on the utility of approaches lowering β-amyloid levels.[9]
  • A notable feature of the results of the semagacestat phase III interim analysis is that subjects on treatment did significantly worse in cognitive assessment and activities of daily living than did subjects in the placebo group. This contrasts with the results from the phase III trial of Myriad’s γ-secretase modulator tarenflurbil, which found that the subjects in the treatment group tracked the placebo control group very closely. The implications of this finding on other companies undertaking development of molecules targeting γ-secretase is not yet clear.

References

  1.  Yi, P; Hadden, C; Kulanthaivel, P; Calvert, N; Annes, W; Brown, T; Barbuch, RJ; Chaudhary, A et al. (2010). “Disposition and metabolism of semagacestat, a {gamma}-secretase inhibitor, in humans”. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals 38 (4): 554–65. doi:10.1124/dmd.109.030841PMID 20075192.
  2.  H. Spreitzer (July 21, 2008). “Neue Wirkstoffe – Semagacestat”. Österreichische Apothekerzeitung (in German) (15/2008): 780.
  3.  Prous Science: Molecule of the Month July 2008
  4.  ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00594568 Effect of LY450139 on the Long Term Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease
  5.  ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00762411 Effects of LY450139, on the Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease as Compared With Placebo (IDENTITY-2)

 

 

12-24-2008
Lactam compound
11-25-2005
Lactam Compound
12-10-2004
Lactam compound
4-23-2004
Lactam compound

 

 

 

Semagacestat
Figure US20130225594A1-20130829-C00130
Share
May 052014
 
Rifamycin SV (yellow structure) and GE23077 (blue structure) bind to adjacent sites on RNA polymerase (red and yellow), and a combination of the two is a bacterial resistance-resistant drug lead.

SIDE BY SIDE
Rifamycin SV (yellow stick structure) and GE23077 (blue stick structure) bind to adjacent sites on RNA polymerase (red and green). Mesh indicates electron density; purple ball is active site’s magnesium ion.

Antibiotic May Sidestep Resistance

Drug Discovery: Bacteria may find agent’s mechanism hard to circumvent.

Researchers finally know exactly how the promising antibiotic GE23077 (GE) inhibits an essential bacterial enzyme. They predict that GE’s ability to hit this enzyme in its active site could make it difficult for bacteria to develop resistance to the agent. The study also shows how GE might be conjugated with another antibiotic to make a combination drug the scientists believe might be unusually resistance-proof.

http://cen.acs.org/articles/92/i18/Antibiotic-Sidestep-Resistance.html

Share
Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: