AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, WORLDDRUGTRACKER

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, Worlddrugtracker, Born in Mumbai in 1964 and graduated from Mumbai University, Completed his PhD from ICT ,1991, Mumbai, India, in Organic chemistry, The thesis topic was Synthesis of Novel Pyrethroid Analogues, Currently he is working with AFRICURE PHARMA as ADVISOR earlier GLENMARK LS Research centre as consultant,Principal Scientist, Process Research (bulk actives) at Mahape, Navi Mumbai, India. Prior to joining Glenmark, he worked with major multinationals like Hoechst Marion Roussel, now sSanofi, Searle India ltd, now Rpg lifesciences, etc. he is now helping millions, has million hits on google on all organic chemistry websites. His New Drug Approvals, Green Chemistry International, Eurekamoments in organic chemistry are some most read blogs He has hands on experience in initiation and developing novel routes for drug molecules and implementation them on commercial scale over a 32 year tenure, good knowledge of IPM, GMP, Regulatory aspects, he has several international drug patents published worldwide . He gas good proficiency in Technology transfer, Spectroscopy, Stereochemistry, Synthesis, polymorphism etc He suffered a paralytic stroke in dec 2007 and is bound to a wheelchair, this seems to have injected feul in him to help chemists around the world, he is more active than before and is pushing boundaries, he has one lakh connections on all networking sites, He makes himself available to all, contact him on +91 9323115463, amcrasto@gmail.com

2-amino-4-bromo-5-fluorobenzoic acid

 spectroscopy  Comments Off on 2-amino-4-bromo-5-fluorobenzoic acid
Oct 092018
 

 

Image result for 2-amino-4-bromo-5-fluorobenzoic acid

 

STR1 STR2

2-amino-4-bromo-5-fluorobenzoic acid as a white to off-white crystalline solid

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.62 (d, J=9.6 Hz, 1H), 7.21-6.5 (m, 3H), 3.8- 3.3 (br s, 1H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.5, 149.6, 147.6, 147.3, 120.4, 118.1, 118.0, 109.2, 109.0, 99.5.

mp >250 °C. IR (neat) 3494, 3351, 3053, 3038, 1521, 774 cm-1;

HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C7H5BrFNO2 [M+H]+ 233.9560, found 233.9551.

Org. Lett.201820 (13), pp 3736–3740
DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01218
1H NMR AND 13C NMR PREDICT
STR1 STR2

////////////

Share

4-(2-fluoro-4-nitrophenyl)morpholine

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on 4-(2-fluoro-4-nitrophenyl)morpholine
Sep 202018
 

str3 str4

4-(2-fluoro-4-nitrophenyl)morpholine

1H NMR (400MHz, CDCl3)  8.03 (ddd J=1.0, 2.6 and 9.0Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.94 (dd J=2.6 and 13.1Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.94 (t J=8.7Hz, 1H, ArH), 3.90 (t J=4.7Hz, 4H, 2xCH2O), 3.31 (m, 4H, 2xCH2N).

13C NMR (100MHz, CDCl3)  153.3 (d J=249.5), 145.6 (d J=7.8Hz), 121.1 (d J=3.0Hz), 117.0 (d J=3.9Hz), 112.7 (d J=6.4Hz), 66.7, 50.0 (d J=4.9Hz).

HRMS [M] Calcd for C10H11FN2O3 226.0748, Found 226.0749.

 

Catalytic Static Mixers for the Continuous Flow Hydrogenation of a Key Intermediate of Linezolid (Zyvox)

James GardinerXuan NguyenCharlotte GenetMike D. HorneChristian H. Hornung, and John Tsanaktsidis

Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP

DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00153

////////////////////

Share

3-fluoro-4- morpholinoaniline

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on 3-fluoro-4- morpholinoaniline
Sep 202018
 

STR1 STR2

3-fluoro-4- morpholinoaniline
1H NMR (400MHz, CDCl3)  6.82 (m, 1H, ArH), 6.43 (m, 2H, 2xArH), 3.87 (m, 4H, 2xCH2O), 3.58 (brs, 2H, NH2), 2.99 (m, 4H, 2xCH2N). 13C NMR (100MHz, CDCl3)  156.9 (d J= 245.4Hz), 143.0 (d J=10.4Hz), 131.8 (d J=9.7Hz), 120.4 (d J=4.2Hz), 110.8 (d J=3.0Hz), 104.0 (d J=23.8Hz), 67.3, 51.9 (d J=2.1Hz). HRMS [M] Calcd for C10H13FN2O 196.1006, Found 196.1004.
Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00153

 

////////////////////

Share

A call to (green) arms: a rallying cry for green chemistry and engineering for CO2 capture, utilisation and storage

 green chemistry  Comments Off on A call to (green) arms: a rallying cry for green chemistry and engineering for CO2 capture, utilisation and storage
Sep 172018
 

Graphical abstract: A call to (green) arms: a rallying cry for green chemistry and engineering for CO2 capture, utilisation and storage

A call to (green) arms: a rallying cry for green chemistry and engineering for CO2 capture, utilisation and storage

 Author affiliations

Abstract

Chemists, engineers, scientists, lend us your ears… Carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) is among the largest challenges on the horizon and we need your help. In this perspective, we focus on identifying the critical research needs to make CCUS a reality, with an emphasis on how the principles of green chemistry (GC) and green engineering can be used to help address this challenge. We identify areas where GC principles can readily improve the energy or atom efficiency of processes or reduce the environmental impact. Conversely, we also identify dilemmas where the research needs may be at odds with GC principles, and present potential paths forward to minimise the environmental impacts of chemicals and processes needed for CCUS. We also walk a different path from conventional perspectives in that we postulate and introduce potential innovative research directions and concepts (some not yet experimentally validated) in order to foster innovation, or at least stoke conversation and question why certain approaches have not yet been attempted. With elements of historical context, technological innovation, critical thinking, and some humour, we issue a call to arms and hope you may join us in this fight.

http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2018/GC/C8GC01962B?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2FGC+%28RSC+-+Green+Chem.+latest+articles%29#!divAbstract

STR1

Julien Leclaire

David Heldebrant

David Heldebrant

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
PO Box 999
Richland, WA 99352

/////////

Share

Development of an SNAr Reaction: A Practical and Scalable Strategy To Sequester and Remove HF

 organic chemistry, SYNTHESIS  Comments Off on Development of an SNAr Reaction: A Practical and Scalable Strategy To Sequester and Remove HF
Sep 142018
 

Abstract Image

A simple and operationally practical method to sequester and remove fluoride generated through the SNAr reaction between amines and aryl fluorides is reported. Calcium propionate acts as an inexpensive and environmentally benign in situ scrubber of the hydrofluoric acid byproduct, which is simply precipitated and filtered from the reaction mixture during standard aqueous workup. The method has been tested from 10 to 100 g scale of operation, showing >99.5% decrease in fluoride content in each case. Full mass recovery of calcium fluoride is demonstrated at both scales, proving this to be a general, efficient, and robust method of fluoride abstraction to help prevent corrosion of glass-lined reactors.

Development of an SNAr Reaction: A Practical and Scalable Strategy To Sequester and Remove HF

 Institute of Process Research and Development, School of Chemistry and School of Chemical and Process EngineeringUniversity of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
 Chemical DevelopmentAstraZeneca, Macclesfield SK10 2NA, United Kingdom
Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00090

///////////////aryl amines, calcium fluoride, fluoride sequestration, scale-up, SNAr reaction,

“ALL FOR DRUGS” CATERS TO EDUCATION GLOBALLY, No commercial exploits are done or advertisements added by me. This is a compilation for educational purposes only. P.S. : The views expressed are my personal and in no-way suggest the views of the professional body or the company that I represent
Share

1-(4-Cyanophenyl)piperazine

 spectroscopy  Comments Off on 1-(4-Cyanophenyl)piperazine
Sep 142018
 

STR1

1-(4-Cyanophenyl)piperazine

1-(4-Cyanophenyl)piperazine (1a).1 Isolated as a mixture of mono (1a) and di (3) arylated products ~9:1. Conversion: quantitative. Peaks attributed to 1a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3Cl) δH 7.47 (m, 2H, arH), 6.83 (m, 2H, ar-H), 3.26 (m, 4H, pip-H), 2.99 (m, 4H, pip-H), 1.69 (br s, 1H, NH). Peaks attributed to 3: 7.52 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 4H, ar-H), 6.88 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 4H, ar-H), 3.29 (s, 8H, pip-H).

Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00090

//////////////

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00090/suppl_file/op8b00090_si_001.pdf

Share

Crystallization

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Crystallization
Sep 122018
 

Image result for Crystallization

Crystallization is the (natural or artificial) process by which a solid forms, where the atoms or molecules are highly organized into a structure known as a crystal. Some of the ways by which crystals form are precipitating from a solutionfreezing, or more rarely depositiondirectly from a gas. Attributes of the resulting crystal depend largely on factors such as temperature, air pressure, and in the case of liquid crystals, time of fluid evaporation.

Crystallization occurs in two major steps. The first is nucleation, the appearance of a crystalline phase from either a supercooled liquid or a supersaturated solvent. The second step is known as crystal growth, which is the increase in the size of particles and leads to a crystal state. An important feature of this step is that loose particles form layers at the crystal’s surface lodge themselves into open inconsistencies such as pores, cracks, etc.

The majority of minerals and organic molecules crystallize easily, and the resulting crystals are generally of good quality, i.e. without visible defects. However, larger biochemical particles, like proteins, are often difficult to crystallize. The ease with which molecules will crystallize strongly depends on the intensity of either atomic forces (in the case of mineral substances), intermolecular forces (organic and biochemical substances) or intramolecular forces (biochemical substances).

Crystallization is also a chemical solid–liquid separation technique, in which mass transfer of a solute from the liquid solution to a pure solid crystalline phase occurs. In chemical engineering, crystallization occurs in a crystallizer. Crystallization is therefore related to precipitation, although the result is not amorphous or disordered, but a crystal.

The design of a successful crystallization process depends on choosing process parameters that will produce crystals of the required purity and yield, that can be isolated, filtered, and dried easily. Process parameters such as cooling rate, solvent composition, and agitation rate directly impact crystallization behavior. Scientists are tasked with understanding how these parameters will influence the outcome of the crystallization process. Often, process parameters for crystallization are chosen based on previous experience, and the outcome is determined by careful analysis of offline analytical data, such as particle size analysis, XRPD, or microscopy. This approach is common, but neglects to consider that crystallization occurs through a sequence of interdependent mechanisms which all contribute to the final outcome, and are each uniquely influenced by the choice of process parameters.

Crystal nucleation and growth, phase separation, breakage, agglomeration, and polymorph transformations can occur separately, but also simultaneously, and are influenced by process parameters in unique ways. This convolution of mechanisms can mask the true role process parameters play in determining the outcome of a crystallization process, and make crystallization process design a particular challenge for scientists. In the absence of mechanistic understanding for crystallization processes, scientists must often rely on trial-and-error to adjust process parameters and optimize yield, purity, and particle size. This can be a time-consuming task and is one that rarely delivers crystals that can be isolated, filtered, and dried in a facile manner.

In this series of articles, the most common crystallization mechanisms are described alongside strategies to optimize them. The complete guide to crystallization mechanisms can be downloaded here.

What is Nucleation?

Nucleation occurs when solute molecules assemble in a supersaturated solution and reach a critical size. Primary nucleation occurs when nuclei appear from a solution directly and secondary nucleation occurs when nulcei appear in the presence of solids. Nucleation is important to understand because the number and size of nuclei formed can have a dominant influence on the final outcome of the crystallization process. High nucleation rates can lead to excessive fines and a bimodal crystal population which can make product isolation, filtration, and further processing difficult.

Considerations for Control

The nucleation rate is dependent on the molecule being crystallized but can be manipulated by considering the solvent type, controlling the supersaturation level, and evaluating the role of impurities and mixing during crystallization design. Seeding is a common strategy deployed to control primary nucleation. Effective seeding can initiate nucleation at a consistent point, and by choosing the seed size and seed loading the nucleation rate can be controlled.

Secondary nucleation often occurs during a crystallization process when supersaturation increases above a critical limit. This can occur when cooling is too fast or when anti-solvent is added quickly in an effort to increase yield. Secondary nucleation is particularly critical to understand and control because it can suddenly appear during scale-up when process parameters are controlled with less precision compared to the lab

Key Crystallization Definitions

Crystallization
Crystallization is a process whereby solid crystals are formed from another phase, typically a liquid solution or melt.

Crystal
Crystal is a solid particle in which the constituent molecules, atoms, or ions are arranged in some fixed and rigid, repeating three-dimensional pattern or lattice.

Precipitation
Precipitation is another word for crystallization but is most often used when crystallization occurs very quickly through a chemical reaction.

Solubility
Solubility is a measure of the amount of solute that can be dissolved in a given solvent at a given temperature

Saturated Solution
At a given temperature, there is a maximum amount of solute that can be dissolved in the solvent. At this point the solution is saturated. The quantity of solute dissolved at this point is the solubility.

Supersaturation
Supersaturation is the difference between the actual solute concentration and the equilibrium solute concentration at a given temperature.

Crystallization
Process-of-Crystallization-200px.png
Concepts
Crystallization · Crystal growth
Recrystallization · Seed crystal
Protocrystalline · Single crystal
Methods and technology
Boules
Bridgman–Stockbarger technique
Crystal bar process
Czochralski process
Epitaxy
Flux method
Fractional crystallization
Fractional freezing
Hydrothermal synthesis
Kyropoulos process
Laser-heated pedestal growth
Micro-pulling-down
Shaping processes in crystal growth
Skull crucible
Verneuil process
Zone melting
Fundamentals
Nucleation · Crystal
Crystal structure · Solid

Busting a myth about mechanochemical crystallization

Adding varying amounts of liquid yields multiple crystal forms
Chart and structures showing the different phases of caffeine and anthranilic acid cocrystals that are produced when different amounts of ethanol are added.
Credit: Cryst. Growth Des.

[+]Enlarge

Chart and structures showing the different phases of caffeine and anthranilic acid cocrystals that are produced when different amounts of ethanol are added.
Mechanochemical crystallization of caffeine and anthranilic acid yields polymorph I, polymorph II, or a mixture, depending on the amount of ethanol added.
Credit: Cryst. Growth Des.

Although it may seem counterintuitive to put a compound into a ball mill to turn it into a crystalline form, the approach nonetheless works—and adding varying amounts of liquid can determine the crystal form that results, reports a team led by Bill Jones of the University of Cambridge (Cryst. Growth Des.2016, DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00682).

Compounds of interest for materials and pharmaceuticals applications often crystallize into different forms, called polymorphs. Because polymorphs can have varying stability, solubility, and other properties, forming a specific polymorph can be critically important.

Chemists have long thought that using one particular liquid when crystallizing compounds via mechanochemical milling always yields one particular polymorph. Seeking to test that dogma, Jones and coworkers crystallized 200 mg of a 1:1 equimolar mixture of caffeine and anthranilic acid using a ball mill, adding from 10 to 100 μL of 15 different liquids.

Four liquids—acetonitrile, nitromethane, ethylene glycol, and 1,6-hexanediol—formed one polymorph each, regardless of the amount of liquid. The rest of the liquids yielded different polymorphs or mixtures, depending on liquid volume: 10 to 20 μL of ethanol formed polymorph II, for example, whereas 40 to 60 μL formed polymorph I. Additionally, 10 μL of 1-hexanol, 1-octanol, or 1-dodecanol formed polymorph III, a polymorph previously only prepared by desolvation.

Similar effects could occur for single-component crystals, the authors say. The mechanism behind the phenomenon remains to be determined; the authors suggest that it could be a result of thermodynamic stabilization of nanoparticles, different growth mechanisms of the polymorphs, or changes in the free-energy difference between polymorphs caused by milling conditions.

See also

References

  1. Jump up^ Lin, Yibin (2008). “An Extensive Study of Protein Phase Diagram Modification:Increasing Macromolecular Crystallizability by Temperature Screening”. Crystal Growth & Design8 (12): 4277. doi:10.1021/cg800698p.
  2. Jump up^ Chayen, Blow (1992). “Microbatch crystallization under oil — a new technique allowing many small-volume crystallization trials”. Journal of Crystal Growth122 (1-4): 176-180. Bibcode:1992JCrGr.122..176Cdoi:10.1016/0022-0248(92)90241-A.
  3. Jump up^ Benvenuti, Mangani (2007). “Crystallization of soluble proteins in vapor diffusion for x-ray crystallography”. Nature Protocols2: 1663. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.198.
  4. Jump up to:a b Tavare, N. S. (1995). Industrial Crystallization. Plenum Press, New York.
  5. Jump up to:a b McCabe & Smith (2000). Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  6. Jump up^ “Crystallization”www.reciprocalnet.orgArchived from the original on 2016-11-27. Retrieved 2017-01-03.
  7. Jump up^ “Submerge Circulating Crystallizers – Thermal Kinetics Engineering, PLLC”Thermal Kinetics Engineering, PLLC. Retrieved 2017-01-03.
  8. Jump up^ “Draft Tube Baffle (DTB) Crystallizer – Swenson Technology”Swenson TechnologyArchived from the original on 2016-09-25. Retrieved 2017-01-03.

Further reading

  • A. Mersmann, Crystallization Technology Handbook (2001) CRC; 2nd ed. ISBN0-8247-0528-9
  • Tine Arkenbout-de Vroome, Melt Crystallization Technology (1995) CRC ISBN1-56676-181-6
  • “Small Molecule Crystallization” (PDF) at Illinois Institute of Technology website
  • Glynn P.D. and Reardon E.J. (1990) “Solid-solution aqueous-solution equilibria: thermodynamic theory and representation”. Amer. J. Sci. 290, 164–201.
  • Geankoplis, C.J. (2003) “Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles”. 4th Ed. Prentice-Hall Inc.
  • S.J. Jancic, P.A.M. Grootscholten: “Industrial Crystallization”, Textbook, Delft University Press and Reidel Publishing Company, Delft, The Netherlands, 1984.

External links

Crystallization Publications

Discover a selection of crystallization publications below:

The seminal study on the nucleation of crystals from solution
Jaroslav Nývlt, Kinetics of nucleation in solutions, Journal of Crystal Growth, Volumes 3–4, 1968.

Excellent study on how crystals grow form solution
Crystal Growth Kinetics, Material Science and Engineering, Volume 65, Issue 1, July 1984.

An excellent description of the reasons solute-solvent systems exhibit oiling out instead of crystallization
Kiesow et al., Experimental investigation of oiling out during crystallization process, Journal of Crystal Growth, Volume 310, Issue 18, 2008.

Detailed examination of why agglomeration occurs during crystallization
Brunsteiner et al., Toward a Molecular Understanding of Crystal Agglomeration, Crystal Growth & Design, 2005, 5 (1), pp 3–16.

A study of breakage mechanisms during crystallization
Fasoli & Conti, Crystal breakage in a mixed suspension crystallizer, Volume 8, Issue8, 1973, Pages 931-946.

A great overview of how to design effective crystallization processes in the high value chemicals industry
Paul et al., Organic Crystallization Processes, Powder Technology, Volume 150, Issue 2, 2005.

Techniques to ensure the correct polymorph is crystallized every time
Kitamura, Strategies for Control of Crystallization of Polymorphs, CrystEngComm, 2009,11, 949-964.

////////////////

Share

Process Development of Febuxostat Using Palladium- and Copper-Catalyzed C–H Arylation

 MANUFACTURING, organic chemistry, spectroscopy, SYNTHESIS  Comments Off on Process Development of Febuxostat Using Palladium- and Copper-Catalyzed C–H Arylation
Sep 112018
 
Abstract Image

There is significant interest in the development of process routes for active pharmaceutical ingredients using C–H arylation methodology. An efficient and practical synthetic route for febuxostat (1), which is the first non-purine-type xanthine oxidase inhibitor, was established via palladium- and copper-catalyzed C–H arylation of thiazole with aryl bromide. The catalyst loading was reduced to 0.1 mol % for the intermolecular C–H arylation, and a three-step synthesis produced febuxostat in 89% overall yield with excellent selectivity

Process Development of Febuxostat Using Palladium- and Copper-Catalyzed C–H Arylation

Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Technology Section, Pharmaceutical Preparation DepartmentTeijin Pharma Limited2-1 Hinode-cho, Iwakuni-shi, Yamaguchi 740-8511, Japan
Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00164

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00164

1 (22.5 g, 98%) as a whitish solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.20 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (dd, J = 9.0 Hz, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.80 (s, 3H), 2.23–2.20 (m, 1H), 1.20 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H).

 

//////FEBUXOSTAT

“ALL FOR DRUGS” CATERS TO EDUCATION GLOBALLY, No commercial exploits are done or advertisements added by me. This is a compilation for educational purposes only. P.S. : The views expressed are my personal and in no-way suggest the views of the professional body or the company that I represent

Share

Ethyl 4, 6-dichloro-1H-indole-2-carboxylate

 organic chemistry, spectroscopy, SYNTHESIS  Comments Off on Ethyl 4, 6-dichloro-1H-indole-2-carboxylate
Aug 282018
 

Ethyl 4, 6-dichloro-1H-indole-2-carboxylate

STR1 STR2

ethyl 4,6-dichloro-1H-indole-2-carboxylate (1a) (2.70 kg, 99.5%).

Mp 187–188 °C; HRMS (ESI) m/z [M – H] calcd for C11H8NO2Cl2 255.9927, found 255.9930;

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.41 (s, 1H), 7.44 (s, 1H), 7.27 (s, 1H), 7.10 (s, 1H), 4.43–4.30 (q, 2H), 1.34 (d, 3H);

13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.69, 137.08, 131.00, 128.45, 128.37, 125.31, 121.26, 110.52, 107.07, 61.56, 14.32;

IR (cm–1) 3314.3, 2987.6, 1700.2, 1615.8, 1566.2, 1523.7, 1487.2, 1323.3, 1247.2, 1072.4, 840.1, 770.2.

Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00144

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00144/suppl_file/op8b00144_si_001.pdf

///////////

Share

Development and Scale-Up of a Continuous Reaction for Production of an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Intermediate

 FLOW CHEMISTRY, flow synthesis  Comments Off on Development and Scale-Up of a Continuous Reaction for Production of an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Intermediate
Aug 242018
 

 

STR1

Flow reactor equipment that was used in the piloting of the aldol flow chemistry. (a) The tube-in-shell heat exchangers were used to control stream temperature upstream and downstream of the (b) Y-mixer. Valves and ports on Y-mixer enabled flushing of lines and incorporation of inline thermocouples.

Abstract Image

Examples of continuous flow reactions in the laboratory setting are becoming commonplace in pharmaceutical drug substance research. Developing these processes for robust commercialization and identifying the scale-up parameters remains a challenge. An aldol reaction in the formation of an active pharmaceutical ingredient intermediate was developed in flow at the milliliter scale. Research focused on identifying conditions that led to robust and stable operating conditions. Desired reaction performance was achieved in various mixers across reactor scales by identifying conditions that led to similar flow regimes. Conditions from the lab were transferred to the pilot plant to successfully process ∼200 kg of the starting material.

Development and Scale-Up of a Continuous Reaction for Production of an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Intermediate

Process Research and DevelopmentMerck & Co., Inc., P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, New Jersey 07065, United States
Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00192

Conclusions


A flow chemistry process for sustainable operations was developed by utilizing THF as a cosolvent to improve the solubility of the reagent degradants. Process robustness was further established by understanding the impact of mixing, residence time, and solvent composition on reaction performance. Identifying a suitable flow regime via the Reynolds number was identified as the scaling parameter for this flow reaction and used to scale the flow reaction from 20 mL/min in the lab to 1.6 L/min in the production environment. A modular flow reactor skid was fabricated for facile integration of flow chemistry components with existing batch equipment and was used to process 200 kg of starting material.

READ AT……….https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00192

///////////////Development, Scale-Up,  Continuous Reaction, Production, Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient, Intermediate, flow chemistry, mixing sensitive reaction, scale-up

Share
Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: